Peer Review Feedback

Running head: Peer review feedback
ASSIGNMENT 6.2
PEER REVIEW FEEDBACK

1
Peer review feedback
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................2
Reflection on peer review................................................................................................................2
Reason for choosing the peer...........................................................................................................2
Self perspective on peer feedback...................................................................................................3
Discussion of positive aspects of teaching......................................................................................3
The reason behind success...........................................................................................................3
Capitalizing positive aspect.........................................................................................................4
Discussion of negative aspects of teaching.....................................................................................4
Reason behind failure...................................................................................................................4
Plans for improvement.................................................................................................................4
Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................4
Reference list...................................................................................................................................5
Appendix..........................................................................................................................................6

2
Peer review feedback
Introduction
This study revolves around reflection and critical analysis of such a peer review
performed by one of my colleagues of university. The formative peer review has been analyzed
on the basis of the given feedbacks on various aspects of teaching process. This has been done so
that I, as a teacher, can be benefitted from the given feedbacks and can make better teaching
plans in future for having a better teaching and learning experience.
Reflection on peer review
The peer review form has three sets of domain that over all deals with presentation of
teaching, assessment of teaching and review on classroom management. In addition, there is a
place for descriptive feedback from the part of the peer and for a self assessment review from the
part of myself (Fernandez & Yu, 2007). After observing the feedback, I can say that my
colleague has judged my teaching session by evaluating its worth as per the background
information about the teaching session that I discussed with him earlier
(communicationtheory.org, 2019). The total score of my performance has been based on a five
point scale where zero stands for never and four stands for always and so on. My overall score,
as per review of my colleague, is 42 out of 60. I have seen that most of my score for individual
items in each domain revolves around 3 that denotes usually. As per this observation, I can say
that my overall performance was good. [Refer to Appendix 1]
Reason for choosing the peer
I work in a university where I teach both graduate and post graduate students. The
colleague that I chose also works in my institution as a teacher. This particular colleague is not
my friend and he very recently joined my institution. This is one of the reasons for choosing him
as my reviewer. This is so because I think that an unfamiliar person can be more eligible to
perceive things from an unbiased outlook (Sullivan, Buckle, Nicky & Atkinson, 2012). On the
other hand, I have researched about this person before selecting him as my reviewer and I have
found that students enjoy his classes and they claim that he allows the notion of active learning