Person-Centric Perspective In Work Psychology

1
Person-Centric Perspective In Work Psychology

2
Introduction
A person centric, commonly known as people centric in plural form, is discussed in the present
essay and how their work psychology is proceeded with. This refers to the personal importance
to increase work growth. Work can become highly interesting to the people because it revolves
the cycle of human life (Cloninger & Cloninger, 2011). While working, the people centric can
experience various emotions of joy, tension, anxiety, sadness, energetic, determined etc. Yet, the
dominating paradigm of the I-O psychology does not do right to all aspects of the people centric.
Under the work psychology paradigm initiated by H.M. Weiss and D. E. Rupp, there has been
three major ingredients which act as a challenge (Weiss & Rupp, 2011). It includes the
accumulation and the analysis of data and information, the definite quality of the sources of the
work and the utilization of personal introspection to construct a psychological science. There lies
the importance of a person centric work psychology. The arena under this sphere is huge. It lays
its focus beginning from the primitive times to the present era (Cooper, O’Hara, Schmid &
Bohart, 2013).
The person centric work psychology includes both the objective and subjective patterns. It
incorporates within itself the transient forms of emotions during work as well as the emotions
which can be extended over a lengthy period of time. The details of the I-O treats with regard to
the workers and the owners hold a key place under this essay. Along with that, the merits,
demerits and the implications of the person centric work psychology in the contemporary era.
Analysis
Advantages and Limitations
The advantages of a person centric work psychology implies that the recommending is a self
interaction between the client and the psychologist. It can be highly helpful for the client by
expanding his welfare and happiness. The person centric approach aids in the examination and
the investigation of the clients of themselves and it enhances the power to resolve their personal
challenges, disputes and issues. It helps in providing the client to show the path of truth,
happiness and success (Forest & Wood, 2012). They learn to possess belief, faith and control in
themselves.

3
From the perspective of the psychologist, they get the opportunity to show their true colors. They
extend their caring and helpful attitudes towards the clients. The clients can build up trust within
themselves and with the psychologist. The psychologists show an impartial, approving and
emphatic approach towards the clients. The clients become more confident and better in every
way. The weaknesses of the clients could be dissolved. The provision of self importance is laid
emphasis because it improves the morale of the clients (Yardley, Morrison, Bradbury & Muller,
2015).
The most effective merit of the work psychology is that the psychologists accept the clients in
their original forms. There is absence of hypocrisy and deception among both the parties. The
psychologists provide the clients with a stage for self exploration the development of self
confidence. The true temperament can be expressed and the weaknesses can be worked upon
efficiently. Thus, these were the key advantages of the person centric work psychology in the
modern day world (Funham, 2012).
Everything in the world possesses advantages as well as well limitations. The person centric
work psychology too contains certain limitations. Every human possess both negative and
positive sides. It is important that the negative sides are curbed easily. But this work psychology
does not create an opportunity for curbing the negative aspects from the people. The interaction
between the psychologist and the client often remains incomplete. Thus, the required
prescriptions and suggestions are often missed out. The work psychology is a failure in the
provision of the appropriate framework, even though the psychologists provide a subscription to
the ethics, ideologies of their jobs within the borders. Also there is absence of the efficient
techniques which promote the smooth functioning of the person centric work psychology (Linton
& Shaw, 2011).
The other limitations include that there is absence of interference of an authority which would
exercise continuous supervision upon the efficient working the work psychology. Sometimes, it
is seen that the psychologists do not possess the required qualifications to deal with the
complicated cases of the clients. They often lack the ability to provide necessary suggestions to
the client as per their needs. These demerits can have a great impact upon the behavioral patterns
of the clients. The above factors were the disadvantages or the limitations that crop in the person
centric work psychology process (Wong, 2011). These demerits needs to be checked so that the