Perspectives on Social Inequality

Running head: PERSPECTIVES ON SOCIAL INEQUALITY
PERSPECTIVES ON SOCIAL INEQUALITY
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author note:

PERSPECTIVES ON SOCIAL INEQUALITY1
Introduction
Children from low income families tend to at increased risk for various poor
consequences particularly deteriorated physical health and educational failure. Child poverty
typically is considered as detrimental for children’s development. Understanding by what
means children are affected by poverty and unequal distribution of wealth is vital for varied
reasons (Spencer, 2018). Firstly, cross-national assessments indicate to the fact that children
tend to encounter detrimental outcomes when they grow up in nations which have high versus
reduced levels of income inequality. The thesis statement of the essay is “Children’s
experience of poverty and income inequality is amplified in Canada, but the country is being
incompetent to protect children from its impact.”
Discussion
Federal evidences with major proportion of child and family poverty in Canada have
been significant with increasing proportions of Aboriginals, perceptible minority and single
parent families (Smeeding & Thévenot, 2016). As per reports, Canada is identified as one of
the few countries like France, Iceland and Sweden where unequal income distribution has
elevated significantly lately. Some of the gaps between children economic development have
broadened such as health symptoms and income disparity, whereas rest are stable in the
domain of physical health conditions and education inequality. Study conducted by
Suphanchaimat et al. (2015) has mentioned that uncertain decline in child poverty since 2008
recession has not altered the fact that increasing number of families have been facing
challenges in accomplishing essential needs. Meanwhile, Monsebraaten (2018) has
mentioned that reports based on current 2016 census and 2015 income tax information shed
light on the association with continual discrimination and systemic inequality instead of
providence or deteriorated individual preferences. Nations constituting increased complete
achievement as well as smaller gaps between children reflect that with adequate investment

PERSPECTIVES ON SOCIAL INEQUALITY2
in child development, both the aspects can be conceivable. According to Dabla-Norris et al.
(2015), broad gaps are insignificant and get instigated with range of undesirable impacts on
children. Life “at the bottom” does not necessarily imply of having less income but sheds
light on significant decline in education, showing reduced and poor health conditions with
more risk behaviours, problematic relations as well as lower life contentment (Welander,
Lyttkens & Nilsson, 2015). Fonseca, Marre and San Román (2015) have noted that children
tend to develop feeling of exclusion at an early age with inferior prospects and lower
aspirations and tend to remain debarred throughout their lives.
There is disseminated but vital report claiming that since last two decades child
poverty has augmented in outright number and in excess of overall poverty in a substantial
number of nations. In contrast to few nations like Canada, rate of child poverty in China has
declined abruptly (Kaneko et al., 2016). The effect of globalisation on child poverty is
perceptibly a complex factor. Although, many developments brought by globalisation are
desirable, it has been noted that globalisation if correctly directed and harnessed might allow
a rapid decrease in child poverty. According to Sharipov (2015), domestic weaknesses and
global asymmetries have instigated a divergence between the gainers and losers of
globalisation. Furthermore, the policy measures introduced in order to liberalize the national
economies have in various cases fuelled an increase within the nation and its inequality which
concurrently impacts the political support for globalisation. In the view of Agénor (2015), an
upsurge in inequality actually decreases the poverty mitigation resistance of development and
consequently shows significance. Thus, reduces the predictions for poverty decrease and
global assimilation. As a result, the linkage between child poverty and globalization has been
mediated by the effect of globalization on the pace and patterns of development. The initial
situations related to the distribution of possessions, human capital as well as opportunities
prior to globalisation tends to leverage the outcomes in relation to growth as well as child