Behaviorist view of Gilbert Ryle | Philosophy Essay
Added on 2022-08-12
4 Pages823 Words39 Views
|
|
|
Running head: PHILOSOPHY
PHILOSOPHY
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author note:
PHILOSOPHY
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author note:
PHILOSOPHY
1
Philosophical behaviourism is understood as an unrespectable doctrine. Such an
understanding is not due to the fact that broadly behaviourist approach towards the
philosophy of mind tends to show unrespectable approach (O'Sullivan). The idea that mental
is holistic is based on the understanding that individuals cannot be in a position of ascribing
single aspect of the state of mind with another individual without being in similar position in
order to attribute an entire range of these features. The following essay aims to explore
problem with behaviourist view of Gilbert Ryle and its relation between mind and bod and
ways in which it interacts.
It is typically assumed that Ryle’s approach towards the philosophy of mind cannot
align with the understanding that mental is holistic. Ryle assumes that the view of dualist
view as illustrated in the Descartes’s ‘official doctrine’ is not the appropriate one. According
to Armstrong, with the problem of mental-physical causation Ryle further takes into
consideration another regular concern related to dualism which sheds light on the problem of
ways in which individuals will obtain understanding of their existence of other minds.
However, O'Sullivan has noted that there are several reasons to which it might show
inappropriateness in explaining Ryle’s position as behaviourist. The first reason can be
related to the avowed purpose of Ryle in the Concept of Mind which showed high meta-
philosophical understandings. Ryle made arguments on the in-depth outlines of ‘Cartesian’
which is the relationship between the mind and body and specifically in opposition to the
‘ghost in the machine’ that is the concept of the inner mental existence (Kotzee). According
to Navarro Reyes, his arguments have shed light on the typical paradigm of the Cartesian
tradition as well as phenomenology. Ryle’s behaviourist view has claimed that it is possible
to distribute the language of mental life as well as interpret the language on the thin (mind) in
relation to behavior.
1
Philosophical behaviourism is understood as an unrespectable doctrine. Such an
understanding is not due to the fact that broadly behaviourist approach towards the
philosophy of mind tends to show unrespectable approach (O'Sullivan). The idea that mental
is holistic is based on the understanding that individuals cannot be in a position of ascribing
single aspect of the state of mind with another individual without being in similar position in
order to attribute an entire range of these features. The following essay aims to explore
problem with behaviourist view of Gilbert Ryle and its relation between mind and bod and
ways in which it interacts.
It is typically assumed that Ryle’s approach towards the philosophy of mind cannot
align with the understanding that mental is holistic. Ryle assumes that the view of dualist
view as illustrated in the Descartes’s ‘official doctrine’ is not the appropriate one. According
to Armstrong, with the problem of mental-physical causation Ryle further takes into
consideration another regular concern related to dualism which sheds light on the problem of
ways in which individuals will obtain understanding of their existence of other minds.
However, O'Sullivan has noted that there are several reasons to which it might show
inappropriateness in explaining Ryle’s position as behaviourist. The first reason can be
related to the avowed purpose of Ryle in the Concept of Mind which showed high meta-
philosophical understandings. Ryle made arguments on the in-depth outlines of ‘Cartesian’
which is the relationship between the mind and body and specifically in opposition to the
‘ghost in the machine’ that is the concept of the inner mental existence (Kotzee). According
to Navarro Reyes, his arguments have shed light on the typical paradigm of the Cartesian
tradition as well as phenomenology. Ryle’s behaviourist view has claimed that it is possible
to distribute the language of mental life as well as interpret the language on the thin (mind) in
relation to behavior.
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Naturalism and Christianity: Understanding the Views on Mind, Body and Soullg...
|8
|1368
|143