Changes in the Plastic Division - Leadership Styles and Impacts on Production Process
Verified
Added on  2023/06/15
|6
|1224
|400
AI Summary
This article discusses the three types of leadership styles in the given case study, their relation with the production process, and the impacts of autocratic leadership on the production process. It also suggests the importance of democratic leadership style for efficient production.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: CHANGES IN THE PLASTIC DIVISION Changes in the plastic division Name of the student Name of the university Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1CHANGES IN THE PLASTIC DIVISION Table of Contents Answer 1:...................................................................................................................................2 Answer 2:...................................................................................................................................3 Answer 3:...................................................................................................................................3 References:.................................................................................................................................5
2CHANGES IN THE PLASTIC DIVISION Answer 1: Three types of leadership style can be seen in the given case study,which are - autocratic style, laissez faire style and democratic style. Description of those leadership style and relation of those concepts with the given case study are shown below. Autocratic style:Rusty’s leadership procedure reflects the autocratic style of leadership. Underanautocraticleadershipstyle,theleaderalwaysremainsconcernedaboutthe leadership position and the entire decision making procedure remains under the control of an individual (Chee, Rasyid, Tengah & Low, 2017).In the given case study, Rusty follows very strict rules regarding the work culture of two factories. He takes all decision independent to run the production procedure. According to him, workers need to compromise with the work culture or they can leave the job. Hence, this kind of attitude clearly indicates an autocratic style. Laissez-Faire Style of Leadership:Ed Sullivan, general manager of the plastic factory, follows the laissez-faire style of leadership. Under this leadership style, the leader cannot take any decision regarding business and the person allows other group members to take this responsibility (Jiang & Jia 2018). Hence, group members feel free to take any decision and this further hampers the entire production process. In the given case study, Sullivan does not have any faith on him to take any decision. Hence, he hires Rusty and gives him complete freedom to take any decision regarding the production procedure. Moreover, Ed provides very little guidance to Rusty and allows him to work independently. Democratic Style of Leadership:Under the democratic leadership style, group members get more opportunity to participate in the process of decision-making and this management style furthermotivatesthemtoperformefficiently.Inthisleadershipstyle,leadergives
3CHANGES IN THE PLASTIC DIVISION opportunity to exchange decision-making ideas with workers (Mohiuddin, 2017).Hence, the chief characteristic of this leadership style is that a sole leader does not take any decision alone. Moreover,the leader also accepts criticism and praise from group members, related to a decision.Wallace follows this leadership style regarding the decision- making procedure. He contacts with key management people and shares his decision with them. Moreover, he starts a suggestion system so that group members can criticise or praise any decision and can reflect their own opinion. Answer 2: Wallace will use democratic style of leadership with Rusty and with other group members, regarding the decision making procedure. Hence, before taking any decision, Wallace will share his decision with all group members and will allow them to criticise or praise this decision according to their work experience (Sebastian, 2018). Thus, in the decision-makingprocedure,heincludesoperativeemployeesandcreatesaplanning committee that includes both management members and operative members. However, the ultimate power to take a decision completely depends upon the leader. Thus, Rusty will be unable to take any business decision independently. However, he can share his opinion with Wallace regarding any business decision and can provide suggestion to Wallace. In other words, Rusty’s decision-making power will be controlled by Wallace. Answer 3: In the given case study, Rusty is opposing the leadership style of Wallace as he wants to take decision freely. He strongly follows autocratic style of leadership and does not want to share his business decision with his group members. This style of leadership has both positive impacts and negative impacts on the production procedure. Excessive control of leader hampers the entire production system. Moreover, group members cannot share their decision
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4CHANGES IN THE PLASTIC DIVISION with leader. They only follow the command of leader during the production process. To take quick decision and control the overall production system strongly, this kind of leadership acts effectively (Nguyen, Winata & Chong 2017). However, most of the time, this leadership process leads other group members negatively as they do not want to work with their interest. Hence, in most of the situation, this leadership style acts negatively and the entire production process hampers adversely. Thus no one can agree with Rusty as this style o leadership has a negative impact on entire production system. To operate a production system appropriately and efficiently, a leader should follow democratic style of leadership. Under this leadership style, a leader allows his group members to share their opinion for a particular decision (Gandolfi & Stone, 2017). This further influences group members to work appropriately and efficiently. However, the ultimate power of adopting a decision finally depends completely on the leader. Hence, the leader enjoys the ultimate power to take any decision. Moreover, the productive capacity of entire group members increases positively which is desirable for any leader or for any business organisation. Hence, to increase productivity, a business organisation should follow democratic style of leadership.
5CHANGES IN THE PLASTIC DIVISION References: Chee, H. K., Rasyid, N. M., Tengah, R. Y., & Low, J. F. L. (2017). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEADERSHIP STYLE AND PERFORMANCE OF PERAK SUKMA ATHLETES AND COACHES.Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences,9(6S), 1323-1333. Gandolfi,F.,&Stone,S.(2017).TheEmergenceofLeadershipStyles:aclarified categorization.Revista de Management Comparat International,18(1), 18. Jiang, Z., & Jia, Z. R. (2018). Effects of Physical Education teachers’ leadership styles and classroom climate on learning motivation for basketball course.Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,14(4), 1351-1357. Mohiuddin,Z.A.(2017).InfluenceofLeadershipStyleonEmployeesperformance: Evidence from Literatures.Journal of Marketing and Management,8(1), 18. Nguyen, T. T., Mia, L., Winata, L., & Chong, V. K. (2017). Effect of transformational- leadership style and management control system on managerial performance.Journal of Business Research,70, 202-213. Sebastian, J. (2018). Gender differences in participatory leadership: An examination of principals’ time spent working with others.International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership,12(8).