Assignment On Plato’s Concept of Democracy

Surname 1
Plato’s Concept of Democracy
Name
Professor
Institution
Course
Date
Plato’s Concept of Democracy
Q5. What lessons can Plato's Republic teach us about our society today? Specifically, consider
Plato's critique of democracy in Book 8. Why does Plato think democracy is such a falling away
from the ideal society? How would you defend democracy against the charges Socrates levels
against it?
Introduction
In the Republic, Plato describes democracy as when the rich become incredibly rich and the poor
extremely poor. According to Socrates also, people who lack the basic knowledge occupy offices
and everyone is considered as an equal in capability. Plato says that philosopher-kings are the
only people who are eligible to govern the society and common people were seen as barbaric and
worthless of the ruling (Held). Plato’s opinion of democracy was formed by his aristocratic
experience. He perceived that only the influential had the right to govern the ordinary people
who seemed like they were ordained to be ruled. Plato describes the elite person as one who was
born with the ability to rule and does not want other people to occupy office and take power.

Surname 2
Plato does not want people to be in power because he thinks that it is right and freedom of
speech and everyone is free to do as one desires (Badiou). Therefore, people will misuse the
ultimate freedom and this will result in a state of instability and chaos. This essay pursues to
address the following; first, it describes the various lessons from the Republic of Plato. Then it
deliberates on the reasons for Plato's thought of a falling away democracy and finally illustrates
how democracy can be defended.
Discussion
Lessons from Plato’s Republic concerning our contemporary society
Plato’s concept of democracy is reasonably different from the modern understanding of
democracy. Plato describes democracy as an acceptable anarchic form of society with lots of
diversity, which regards every person as equal, irrespective of being equal or not. In a
revolutionary society, the basic rights of people are not protected and there is extreme chaos
since the person in power has his law and places it on people (Meagher and Feder). Therefore,
there will be rampant violence leading to tyranny and oppression in a society that lacks law and
order. To preclude society from anarchism, there should be regulation in the rule of law on that
democratic society, however, Plato explains it differently.
Plato was precise that the individual's interests eventually coincide with the interests of the
society, for a society is only as beneficial as the persons who contribute to it, and vice versa.
However, he went wrong in failing to appreciate the basics of the self-harmony that he justifiably
believed constituted communal and individual happiness – the fundamentals being freedom, and
the opinion that an individual's sense of self is understood by others (Thakkar). Contemporary
liberal ideas are over-compensate for this shortage in Plato. These ideologies have a penurious

Surname 3
view of what freedom means and why it is important, for they promote the idea of a secluded,
ahistorical person who requires only protection from other people instead of durable and genuine
bonds with them (McPherran).
Why does Plato think democracy is such a falling away from the ideal society?
In the Republic, Plato outlines exactly how he thinks regarding society and what is the real sense of
justice in that society. His ultimate society would be led in the way of an aristocracy whereby the
philosopher-kings use the custodians to eventually rule the ordinary craftspeople (Bolarfinwa).
He believes that democracy fits properly into aristocratic society. However, Plato does not consider
that a democratic community is advantageous. According to Plato, the regular person does not
have the expertise and mastery of sensations essential to make knowledgeable and rational rulings
concerning various government practices and laws (Tumolo). He deems that the common society
is pushed by its specific self-interest in the globe and consequently cannot perform in a politically
smart way.
Plato supposes that allowing these people, who are driven by feeling and ignorant to processes of
the government to run the State or justice, is completely a bad idea. He agrees that the philosopher-
kings, whose major goal is to assist maintain well for the whole society, should solely be permitted
to rule a government. Plato's concept of justice stated in the Republic appears to be perfect in
theory. If society could operate in this way usually, it would be a utopian society. The only setback
is that history has established that have societies functioned in this manner and these processes
have largely failed (Barker).
How would you defend democracy against the charges Socrates levels against it?