Policy and Politics

This presentation discusses the packet lunch policy, its purpose, impact on people and service users, and the debate surrounding the policy and its ideology. It also provides pros and cons of the policy and includes relevant references.

POLICY AND POLITICS

TABLE OF CONTENT
Name of policy and issue date
What does policy say
Purpose of policy
Impact of policies on people and service users
Demonstrate that there is debate concerning policy and what type of ideology based on policy

NAME OF POLICY AND ISSUE DATE
• Packet lunch policy is based on the process where food must be packed in properly
because it can serve to children in schools and a trip where student eat as lunch. The policy
has developed by government and associated with the healthy food serving in school.
• The policy might be issued in 2015 that shows the risk of people due to unhealthy food
items. It also causes of chronic diseases that affects on human body. In this way, Packet
lunch policy create trust among parents where they always used packet policy to properly
use healthy food in schools.

WHAT DOES POLICY SAY
• In schools, it will work with pupils to give appropriate room arrangement where children
eat lunch.
• It also promotes within school to ensure that packet lunches abide by accurate standards
and norms.
• It makes a positive contribution to the health of children’s by encouraging of eating
healthy food.

PURPOSE OF POLICY
• The purpose of packet lunch policy is to ensure that all type of packet lunches brought
from home and consumed in school. It should provide the nutritious and healthy food
which contain similar quality of food served in the schools. It is required to meet the
specific standards.

IMPACT OF POLICIES ON PEOPLE AND SERVICE USERS
• The policy is intended to set up specific values and principles that provide better quality
of services within schools. Many people believed on the services where they are packed
the food item in properly and take care of children health. Packed lunch policy impact on
the people where they are adopting policy in daily life and provide lunch for children’s in
schools. They must be used proper warp lunch in packed.

DETERMINE THE OPINION ON POLICY
• Most of people agreed that school food services follow packed policy that should
maintain nutrition level. Families also supporting and encouraging to make changes
gradually. It always used packed lunch policy to provide better quality of services. It
keeps up-to-date process to make sure that decreases the rate of diseases. In this way,
Parents are having positive opinion about packed lunch policy and consider as most
suitable approach for protecting the health condition of children’s in schools.

DEMONSTRATE THAT THERE IS DEBATE CONCERNING
POLICY AND WHAT TYPE OF IDEOLOGY BASED ON POLICY
• Packed lunch policy provide the unique inclusion which mainly involves the proper diet
of nutrition in schools. It must require to follows the proper protocol which highly
appreciable as parent to aware about the problem and causes in global world.
• As per evidence that policy is not only targeted to the food insecurities but it chooses the
better packed food services and consider as a healthy diet. There are 3.7 Million children
not acquire proper diet so that it packed lunch policy suitable for providing better meal
facility with full of nutrition’s.

CONT.
Pros
• The packed lunch policy will help to maintain hygienic during transportation and
maintain storage various type of drinks as well as food items.
• It also useful for reduce the exposure of contaminants in air during handling.
• In society, many communities are chosen packed lunch policy to distributed goods and
services.

CONT.
Cons
• It is very convenient but some people not prefer the policy where they provide food on
poly bags which harmful for school children's For Example- in school canteens.
• It has increased the price and cost of food item so that smaller packing policy meet the
proper health standards of school children.

REFERENCES
• Zarnowiecki, D. and et.al., 2019. Comparison of school day eating behaviours of 8-11
year old children from Adelaide, South Australia, and London, England (vol 5, pg 394,
2018). AIMS public health. 5(4). pp.477-482.
• Yu, B., Lim, H. and Kelly, S., 2019. Does receiving a school free lunch lead to a stigma
effect? Evidence from a longitudinal analysis in South Korea. Social Psychology of
Education. 22(2). pp.291-319.

THANK YOU