2 1. Motivations behind the formation of EU and how it has affected European geopolitics European Union trade block consists of countries. It was first formed in the year 1950, when the European trade ideologies was established consisting of about six countries idea of European. Purposely, EU was formed to tighten social, economic and political boundaries of the European countries after 2ndWorld War.(Baldwin, 2016). How the EU formation has affected European geopolitics Through the Establishment of policies that’s subjected to a mixed type of political thinking. EU’s geographical space has made it to export the norms and values which have been developed in the region to other regions as well as stabilize the regional and global environments. Function of the EU in ensuring accountability of the US’s geopolitical influence The EU plays an important function in maintaining the US’s shared freedom values, peace and prosperity across the region and even globally as well as protecting the interests of the region by ensuring that the EU and is members are in a strategic position with the US in a fiercer era of geopolitical competition(Heidbreder, 2012). Factors in place that keep the European Union accountable for the geopolitical influence i)Considering more integrations as the best Geopolitics In some situations, the best approach to be accountable for the geopolitical influence is to complete the long-standing integration projects(Ruijter, 2014). ii) Concentrating on Multilateralism
3 The European Union ought to know the prevailing risks of the geopolitical approach. A global view mainly focused on the disagreement between the power blocs generating a similar mindset to that of an arms race. The future of Arab League or the United Nations The four scenarios below show the possible futures of Arab League or the United Nations; Scenario 1: Firm state Government will in the coming years have the responsibility to control of their fate and as well will decline to work together as one state on common problems(Heidbreder, 2012). Scenario 2: State of the World This depicts that the government in the future will have an interest in wanting to govern the fate of countries through working together United Nations to combat all common challenges. Scenario 3: World Inc. The countries governments is depicted to be unable to control and govern the destiny of the country and this will lead to the filling of transnational corporations Scenario 4: Wild State This state depicts the governments of nations losing control and governance of their countries. 2.
4 Relationship between populism of figures and reconstructed leftism In right wing populism, the political philosophy chains both the populist themes and the right- wing politics. The populist theme entails sentiments of anti-elitist, this opposes and prevents the formation and dialogue with common people(Roth, 2015). InLeft-wing populism, the political beliefs and systems that initiates both the left-wing politics and rhetoric themes. This themes tends to oppose the process of establishing dialogue on behalf of the common people Similarities between populism and reconstructed leftism figures They are both rhetoric populist that have political ideologies and beliefs(Bernaciak, 2015). They both oppose the establishment and speak on behalf of the common people Both the populism and leftism are against openness and honesty in trading They are both driven by the protectionism of economic growth and development which is in regards to their processes of electorates of the constituencies. Both these parties are not truthful and claim to work for its people and want to cater for the needs of the common man and this opposes the establishing process of trade in the EU. Differences between populism and reconstructed leftism figures The differences between populism and leftism’s are majorly based on ideologies, beliefs and systems used in movement, governance or control of countries. These includes:
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
5 Whereas Left wing-populism wants to decrease the influence of the rich, right wing populism is really opposing this sort of development. Right-wing populism is strongly and purely against immigration and often hostile to minor immigrants in existence. Left-wing populism is not against immigrants. Whereas Left-wing populism is typically radical and fundamentally based its issues on sexual concerns, right-wing populism prefers to do reverse much that has been done on sexual issues. Right wing acknowledges and upholds racism and matters related to racism. However currently it is changing this as some view blacks can be found in their states. Unlike right-wing, left-wing populism is highly anti-racists. How “Left” in Latin America has shaped by its historical and current geopolitical relationship with the United States Because of the early 1980s democratization process, the creations and development electoral based competition brought up potential and possibilities of moving from left to the position of controlling the country. Most of the past and history of the area depicts how the opened up completion of electrical influenced leftism. Ways in which leftism initiated the movement was by enhancing the shortcomings in suffrage as well as involving and dominating the military in influencing the suppression process in the 20thcentury(Lasas, 2013).
6 References Baldwin, R. (2016).Expanding Membership of the European Union.Texas: Cambridge University Press. Bernaciak, M. (2015).Market Expansion and Social Dumping in Europe.Chicago: Routledge. Heidbreder, E. (2012).The Impact of Expansion on European Union Institutions.Sydney: Palgrave Macmillan US. Lasas, A. (2013).European Union and NATO Expansion.London: Palgrave Macmillan. Roth, S. (2015).Gender Politics in the Expanding European Union.London: Berghahn Books. Ruijter, A. d. (2014).EU Health Law & Policy.Chicago: OUP Oxford.