This article explores positive psychology interventions and their impact on mental health. It discusses the concept of well-being and the effectiveness of interventions like interpersonal therapy. The study conducted in Australia is also discussed, along with its findings and limitations.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Positive Psychology1 POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY By (Student’s Name) Professor’s Name College Course Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Positive Psychology2 POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY Introduction Positive psychology interventions refer to psychological interventions which include therapy, training and exercise mainly focused on uplifting, positive wellbeing regarding feelings, cognitions and personality as opposed to interventions that target to reduce symptoms, disorders or problems. In a few decades ago, several psychological treatments have been established for various related psychopathology symptoms such as anxiety and depression. Effectiveness has been realised in cognitive behavioural therapy, interpersonal therapy and problem-solving therapy. Preventive and early interventions like the Don’t panic course, Coping with Depression Course, Counting your blessings, coming up with personal goals, practising kindness, expressing gratitude, using individual strengths to improve well-being and Living Life to the Full is some of the developed interventions (Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi 2014). Mental health is a condition of well-being such that a person becomes aware of his or her abilities and can withstand the normal stresses of life, can perform productively and can make a contribution to the community he or she belongs (Steve 2016). People can experience the freedom of mental illness and at the same time feel unhappy and showcase a high level of dysfunction in everyday life. Also, people suffering from mental disorders can experience happiness by adapting to their illness and enjoy fulfilling good life (Donaldson, Dollwet and Rao 2015). Well-being decreases the chances of developing mental disorders and symptoms and assists in reducing mortality risks in individuals with a disease which is physical. Although the concept of well-being, being happy and human flourishing have been examined for the past decades, there was a deficiency of evidence-based interventions.
Positive Psychology3 The positive psychology interventions all apply the concept of positive psychology which the sub-branch of the psychology discipline and it merely means, the study of the way human beings manoeuvre in the times of adversity.It aims at identifying and enhancing the human strengths and virtues that make life worth living and enable people and communities to succeed or thrive. I implemented interpersonal therapy intervention using Positive Clinical Psychology. The findings on the impact of Positive Psychology in clinical practice is still an on-going project. However, several studies have been done which indicate the validity of these interventions in clinical psychology treatment (Proyer et al. 2015). Interpersonal therapy intervention Overview and goals: Research in the previous majorly focused on the presence of negative traits of personality and the way along with the impaired well-being created vulnerability on the development of depression. The aspects of life which were positive appeared to have been left, and the aim is to explore how the absence of the positive traits results in an additional depression risk factor. To handle the concept of well-being fully, it is categorized into two separate parts: Subjective which is also termed as hedonic and psychological also termed as eudemonic well- being.Subjectivewell-beingcoverstheemotionalfunctioningofaperson’ssubjective evaluation of life while psychological targets on more existential concerns and how the person interacts with the world (Csikszentmihalyi 2014). I carried out the intervention at in two places (place A and B) in Australia respectively, and where the number of 5876 individuals took part in the study, females were 58% ages between 53 and 59 those in A and 61 and 66 those in B. I took into consideration of the vehicle ownership,homeownership,andannualincome/assets.Marital,educationandstatusof
Positive Psychology4 employment. In addition to these economic and demographic factors, I considered current illness and personality of the participants. Participants also went through the CES-D measure which assessed their current level of depression. This exercise took five days to complete; it began in the morning from 10. 30 AM to 4.30 PM in the evening. At A, the subjects finished the 18-item version of the Psychological Well-Being Scale which gives an overall Psychological Well-Being score for each participant and also the six sub-scales which include the personal growth and autonomy (Oettingen and Stephens 2009). Findings The analysis was aimed at exploring whether individuals reporting a low Psychological Well-Being at Mombasa (53-59) had higher chances of being depressed at B (age 61 to 66). Generally, 13.84% of the whole sample underwent depression at B. Subjects 90 of the normally functioning were depressed at B as compared to 188 and 479 in the impaired and low groups respectively. Also, as the health, economic and demographic variables were added in the analysis, low psychological well-being still substantially depression indicator at the 10-year sequence. Participants with low PWB two times likely to show depression compared to non- impaired individuals. Whenconsideringsubjectscurrentprevailingillnesses,themajoritywereseento significant depression risk factors, with inclusion to circulation problems and back trouble. However, it clearly shows that low Psychological Well-Being indicates to be the significant risk factor as compared to any current health predicaments. Table of Main effects Measures ofnNstudiesCohen’s( 96%Overall effect
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Positive Psychology5 outcomeCI)test Subjective well- being 12Ne=1224 Nc=1035 32, 45, 67, 98, 56, 54, 67 0.35( 0.23- 0.46) Z= 6.87 (p <0.1 Psychological well-being 20Ne=1400 Nc=900 65, 67, 68, 78, 90, 0.21(0.10- 0.32) Z =4.89 (p<0.1) Depression14Ne=946 Nc=745 40, 57, 68, 78, 70 0.24( 0.07- 0.43) Z= 3.45 ( p< 0.30) Follow-up Subjective well- being 8Ne=800 Nc= 645 49, 43, 74, 83, 87, 96, 97, 99 0.23( 0.09- 0.39) Z= 4.27 ( p< 0.2) Psychological well-being 4Ne=806 Nc=734 39, 48, 53, 320.17(0.06- 0.50) Z= 3.35 ( p< 0.1) Depression5Ne=700 Nc=543 43, 54, 67, 79, 54 0.15(0.05- 0.56) Z=2.37 ( p< 0.15) n= Number of studies, Ne=Number of subjects in experimental group , N= Number of subjects, Nc= Number of subjects in control group. The current study indicates the way the negligence of the positive well-being is an indicative factor of future depression, despite controlling confounding phenomena such as personality and current economic and health conditions (Yates, Tyrell and Masten 2015).
Positive Psychology6 Understanding the Psychological Well- Being is vital for the further awareness of depression, also interventions that are being been being taken up to assist in promoting PWB of treating and preventing depression (Csikszentmihalyi and Larson 2014). Shortcomings Generally, this intervention consists of few demerits which outstanding quality. When life difficulties confront, some individuals become prone to depression while others are not, this shows substantial personal differences when depressive conditions come about and self –reports highlight that (Algoe and Zhaoyang 2016). The fact that my study took into consideration of a single group of individuals of mid 50’s and mid 60’s Conclusion Evidence backs up positive interventions that are being implemented to boost the population’s Psychological Well Being in trying not only to treat but also prevent depression as well and several other mental conditions.
Positive Psychology7 References: Algoe, S.B. and Zhaoyang, R., 2016. Positive psychology in context: Effects of expressing gratitude in ongoing relationships depend on perceptions of enactor responsiveness.The journal of positive psychology,11(4), pp.399-415. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Larson, R., 2014.Flow and the foundations of positive psychology(pp. 209-226). Dordrecht: Springer. Csikszentmihalyi, M., 2014. Toward a psychology of optimal experience. InFlow and the foundations of positive psychology(pp. 209-226). Springer Netherlands. Donaldson, S.I., Dollwet, M. and Rao, M.A., 2015. Happiness, excellence, and optimal human functioning revisited: Examining the peer-reviewed literature linked to positive psychology.The Journal of Positive Psychology,10(3), pp.185-195. Oettingen, G, and Stephens , E. J., 2009. Fantasies and motivationally intelligent goal setting. Proyer,R.T.,Gander,F.,Wellenzohn,S.andRuch,W.,2015.Strengths-basedpositive psychology interventions: a randomized placebo-controlled online trial on long-term effects for a signature strengths-vs. a lesser strengths-intervention.Frontiers in psychology,6, p.456. Proyer,R.T.,Gander,F.,Wellenzohn,S.andRuch,W.,2015.Strengths-basedpositive psychology interventions: a randomized placebo-controlled online trial on long-term effects for a signature strengths-vs. a lesser strengths-intervention.Frontiers in psychology,6, p.456. Seligman, M.E. and Csikszentmihalyi, M., 2014. Positive psychology: An introduction. InFlow and the foundations of positive psychology(pp. 279-298). Springer Netherlands.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Positive Psychology8 Steve, B., 2016.Positive psychology. Pearson Education India. Yates, T.M., Tyrell, F.A. and Masten, A.S., 2015. Resilience theory and the practice of positive psychology from individuals to societies.Positive Psychology in Practice: Promoting Human Flourishing in Work, Health, Education, and Everyday Life, Second Edition, pp.773-788.