HLTH101 Assessment 1 Evaluation of Information

HLTH101 Assessment 1 Evaluation of Information
Gallagher (2021) Mumper (accessed 27
January 2021)
Fox (2021) Krause et al (2020)
The
Publication:
Type?
Peer
reviewed?
Editorial
policy?
Audience?
Advertising?
The publication is Editorial
based.
The article is peer reviewed
and its editorial policy is based
on information related to
healthy and science
correspondent.
The publication is in form of
a article written by Dr Liz
Mumper who belongs to
Children's health defence
team.
The target audience is the
general society who have to
be provided information
about the detailed answers of
safety of COVID vaccine
(Scherer and et. Al 2018)).
The article is a academic
journal.
The audience is mainly
students who are studying in
University of western
Australia.
The article is written
by Phillip Katuse and
is published on the
Lancet. The article is
addressed to general
public as there can be
evaluation of the
present situation of
COVID 19 vaccine
trails.
The Content:
Tone?
Referenced?
Verifiable
information?
Paid?
Information is verifiable as it
is published on BBC website.
The source of information is
paid but is available for
general public.
The overall tone of the
article is clear and according
to the point of safety of
COVID vaccine.
The information is
completely verifiable
because Dr, Mumper is CEO
and president of RIMLAND
centre that has established
mentor clinicians interested
in children with neuro
development problems.
The tone of article is clear and
explanatory. There are key
justifications of the four
myths that is related with
whether the Pfizer vaccine is
approved in Australia.
The content is
referenced properly.
The information is
according to the logic
of dealing with issues
to define the success of
vaccine as per the
initials of trails
comparing COVID 19
vaccines.
The Author:
Qualifications
?
Affiliation?
Other
publications?
The writer is James Gallagehr
who is working in the health
and science correspondent
department of BBC.
The qualification of author is
that she is CEIO and
president of The RIMLAND
centre. She has attended
medical college of Virginia
and has been part of
residency training at
university of Virginia.
The author is Archa fox who
is associate professor and
ARC future fellow. The
qualification of archa Fox is
that she is chair of RNA
network of Australia and
director if international RNA
society.
Philip Krause is
working in centre of
Biologics Evaluation
and research in the US
food and drug
administration,
Washington, DC, USA.
Conclusion:
Reliability?
Validity?
The information part of this
source is completely reliable
and valid as it is providing the
required information related to
COVID vaccine update.
The information is reliable as
and valid as the whole article
is written by experienced
faculty who has served 16
years as clinical faculty.
The reliability and validity of
information is based on
technical information that is
assisting in the process of
understand whether the Pfizer
vaccine is approved and can
be used by general public in
Australia. The main idea is to
justify where the Pfizer
vaccine is approved and can
be used by general public.
The overall
information is valid
and reliable as it is
related with whether
the COVID 19 vaccine
trails are seeking
worthwhile efficacy as
per requirements of the
present changing
scenario.
Name: Student Number: