This report discusses the concept of fair value accounting and its pros and cons. It also explores the three-tier process of fair value estimation and the qualitative characteristics of financial information. The report provides an in-depth analysis of the topic and offers relevant study material for further understanding.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: PRACTICE OF ACCOUNTING THEORY Practice of Accounting Theory Name of Student Name of University Author’s Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1Practice of Accounting Theory Introduction According to the accounting theory, theconcept of Fair Value Accountinghas been used for around two decades. Fair value concept includes measuring assets and liabilities at their existing value. The concept of fair value is different from the fact of books of account naturally accounting concept based on historical cost and not on the existing value. The fair value concept leads to debate because some of the important matters are needed for consideration investment choices and decisions regarding business by managers (Lin et al, 2017). The following report will aim to discuss the fact offair value accountingand also analyzing the academic article which is provided. 1. Fair ValueAccounting(FVA):Pros and Cons As said by Chircop and Novotny-Farkas (2016), FVA is an accounting process where the organization creates a benchmark and reports the assets and liabilities holding by them in that period in their fair value. The method has certain advantages, they are explained below: Minimized Net Profit There is a decrease in the net profit of the companywhen the asset value declines while using FVA. Evenwhen there is an increase in the value of the liabilities, the net profit value of the organization declines as well. Net profit of an organization states the amount on which tax is being incurred(Duska, Duska & Kury, 2018).This proves to be the advantage towards to the businessbecause of the fact thatless net profit lowers the tax payment and also the similar kind of advantage can be observed when the value of assets and liabilities falls in business equity (Marra, 2016). Due to the lower business equity the business has to decide a lower amount of
2Practice of Accounting Theory money for the business organization. Due to the above mentioned fact the bonuses for the employee are being declined and hence the more cash will be present in the pocket of organization. Realistic Financial Statement The companies who have adopted FVA concept for accounting can produce more accurate financial statement compare to those who do not use it. Due to the representing of actual value in case of assets and liabilities it states more accurate and realistic financial statement (Marra, 2016). The organizations who have adopted the FVA method have to disclose the information regarding the changes in financial statement in the form of financial note. This practice also helps to take more accurate and realistic decisions regarding the business operations in future(Badia et al., 2017). Investor Benefit The organizations who have adopted the FVA concept of accounting are able to show the real financial health of the organization (Marra, 2016). This helped the investors to take concrete decisionsregardingtheinvestmentintheorganization.Therequiredfootnotediscloses investigation of investors and impact of variations in statements. In spite of having some superficial advantage but it still persist some limitation regarding the using of FVA concept. They are explained below: Frequent Changes The market is volatile and the value of any item can change frequently. Due to this above mentioned problem the variations in value and earnings may take place frequently (Marra, 2016).
3Practice of Accounting Theory The write-off items of organizations may losses compared to the earnings associated with the organizations.Thelistedcompanieswillfaceconsiderableamountofproblemasthe organization may face some kind of difficulties in valuing the organizations due the variations. If any wrong valuation occurred then the issues started reading audit(Bens, Chang and Neamtiu, 2015). Lower Liability At the time of accounting the accountant tends to find theassets’ or investments’ new values. The item value may differ from one place to anotherand thus, it requires the accountants of the companies to do the valuation of book items through making judgment calls(Israeli, 2015). If an organizations started to valuing items with identical investments in assets will cause a problem for accountant. Minimized Book Value According to the historical value there might bealteration in the book value ofan organization when the assets are purchased or when old assets are sold. In accordance with FVA concept it tends to change theorganizational book valuefor issues regarding arbitrary. When the investment seesa decline in thevalue for short-term the organization required to modify the accounting method(Du, Li & Xu, 2014). When the value of an organization increases it did not conduct anythingandthe book value decline for a shorter time frame.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4Practice of Accounting Theory 2. The Three-tier Process As stated by the article of Marra (2016),it is required tofollows a three-tier processfor the estimation of fair value whichhave a perfect stagnant preference for market based measures. Thetier model is explained below: Level I Input The benchmark set for assets and liabilities these inputs are also unadjusted cited prices in the active market. At the time of benchmarking the fair value the organizations need not adjust the price since it is quoted in the active market.The market needs to be accessedat the date of measurementby the organizationsfor the above-mentioned reasons. The active market can be explained as a place where the transactions occurred in volume and the pricing information is frequently provided. It is necessary for another method which could be used and according to the standard it can be established. There might come the situation where thequoted pricein the market does not show the fair value at themeasurement date. During the time of business combination or the reorganization occurs after the market closure (Crain & Law, 2017). Level 2 Input Theseare theinputs which are expectation of the quoted price of Input I for the asset and liability. These are explained as quoted liabilities or assets for theundistinguishablesunstances in active market or support the market datasuch ascredit spreads, yield curves and rates of interests (Henry and Leone, 2015). It is required for the adjustments of these inputs and it is necessary to categories the fair value in accordance of fair value. Level 3 Input
5Practice of Accounting Theory The presence of these input are microscopic and hence it can be observed so the usage of these input should be minimized. At the timeto determinethe effective price of assets or liabilities the market member should be utilized by developing the assumptions (Muda et al., 2017). This occurs when the there are no possibility to observe the relevant input. The organization should increase the usage of the inputs which can be observed while should reduce the utilization of the inputs which are not being observed. For example, the cash flow can be used for the valuation of the organization which is unlisted.The basis of the measurement of the fair valueis the lowest level input which has more importance (Kim et al, 2016). 3. Qualitative Characteristics of Financial Information At the time of the use of fair value accounting by the companies, it is required to make the assessment ofthe qualitative characteristics of business organizations. The financial statement provided by the organization because of taking appropriate decisions.Onecharacteristic is materiality which makes the accountants and auditors totake into considerationthefinancial information which will help to increase theefficiency of thedecision making process of the organizations. Another characteristic is that the financial information should be presented without any alteration or any kind of malfunction should not happen. The fourth characteristics the comparisons needed between the financial information of the organizations and period. The fifth characteristics state the verifiability of the economic condition of the business operations of the organizations. The sixth characteristics require the disclosure of the financial statement of the organizations within the time period. The final characteristics requireto understand the financial information provided by the organizations by shedding some light economics and business operations.
6Practice of Accounting Theory All the above mentioned characteristics have a relationship with the fair value of the accounting concept. According tothe method of fair value accounting,relevancy needs to be there in the information regarding fair value accounting. Such disclosure of the financial statement of the organizations needs to be done in timely manner for the users of the financial statement. In the perspective of the fair value of the accounting concept there are no materiality problem since the right information are being delivered.One crucial aspect that should be mentioned in here isthat the fair value accounting isdeveloped for the assets as well as liabilities which have the above-mentioned qualitative characteristics of financial information. In respect of transferring the assets and liabilities or selling of assets or liabilities the participant of the market follow the particular order which is as per the fair value of accounting method. The fair value of assets and liabilities are liable to transfer in the next accounting year (Christensen & Nikolaev, 2013). Conclusion It can be seen from the above discussionthat the fair value accounting has considerable amount of benefits for utilizing it. The main benefits of using fair value accounting includes investor benefit minimized net income and realistic assumption. At the same time it has some limitations. The limitations of fair value accounting include frequent modification, minimized the assets’ and liabilities’ book valueand lower reliability. From the above evaluation it can be seen thatmethod of fair value accountingfollows a three-tier processfor measuring themarket based information and measurement. In this report the information of three inputs are discussed including observable and unobservable inputs. At the end of this report it can be concluded that the fair value accounting methodadheres toall the qualitative characteristics of financial
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7Practice of Accounting Theory information so that it can deliver the accurate and timely information to the users of the financial statements of the organizations. .
8Practice of Accounting Theory References Badia, M., Duro, M., Penalva, F., & Ryan, S. (2017). Conditionally conservative fair value measurements.Journal of accounting and economics,63(1), 75-98. Bens, D. A., Cheng, M., &Neamtiu, M. (2015). The impact of SEC disclosure monitoring on the uncertainty of fair value estimates.The Accounting Review,91(2), 349-375. Christensen, H. B., & Nikolaev, V. V.(2013). Does fair value accounting for non-financial assets pass the market test?.Review of Accounting Studies,18(3), 734-775. Crain, N., & Law, K. (2017). The bright side of fair value accounting: Evidence from private company valuation.Available at SSRN 3040396. Du, H., Li, S. F., & Xu, R. Z. (2014). Adjustment of valuation inputs and its effect on value relevance of fair value measurement.Research in Accounting Regulation,26(1), 54-66. Duska, R. F., Duska, B. S., & Kury, K. W. (2018).Accounting ethics. Wiley-Blackwell. Henry, E., & Leone, A. J. (2015).Measuring qualitative information in capital markets research: Comparison of alternative methodologies to measure disclosure tone.The Accounting Review,91(1), 153-178. Israeli, D. (2015). Recognition versus disclosure: evidence from fair value of investment property.Review of Accounting Studies,20(4), 1457-1503. (Israeli, 2015) Kim, J. B., Li, L., Lu, L. Y., & Yu, Y. (2016).Financial statement comparability and expected crash risk.Journal of Accounting and Economics,61(2-3), 294-312.
9Practice of Accounting Theory Lin, Y. H., Lin, S., Fornaro, J. M., & Huang, H. W. S. (2017). Fair value measurement and accounting restatements.Advances in accounting,38, 30-45. Marra, A. (2016). The pros and cons of fair value accounting in a globalized economy: A never ending debate.Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance,31(4), 582-591. Muda, I., Dharsuky, A., Siregar, H. S., & Sadalia, I. (2017, March).Combined Loadings and Cross-Dimensional Loadings Timeliness of Presentation of Financial Statements of Local Government. InIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering(Vol. 180, No. 1, p. 012099). IOP Publishing.