What is a Pre-Sentence Report

Verified

Added on  2022/08/17

|5
|1100
|11
AI Summary
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.
Document Page
Running head: PRE-SENTENCE REPORT 1
Pre-sentence Report
Student’s Name
Institution
Date
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
Running head: PRE-SENTENCE REPORT 2
Report Option #2: Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (Adult)
Court Name of Defendant:
Lindsey Nahol
Court: City/Town:
True Name of Defendant:
Lindsey Nahol
Sentencing Date: Docket No.(s):
Alias or Nickname:
N/A
State No.:
Offender
Description
Present Address: Telephone No.:
Name of Address of Closest Relative: Telephone No.
Age: Date of Birth: Place of Birth: Soc. Sec. No.:
Sex Height Weight Eyes Hair Complexion Build Race
Identifying Mark(s):
Present
Offense
Judge: Fairmont State’s Attorney: Defense Attorney:
Offense(s) as Charged: robbery
Offense(s) as Convicted:
Robbery and assault and
battery
Statute(s) & Penalty(ies)
Five (5) years in prison, followed by five (5) years
of probation
Arrest Date(s): Co-defendant(s):
Bond: Confined: Convicted By: Judge
Fairmount
Criminal Record:
No Yes Yes _
(see attached)
Disposition: She is convicted since she was found guilty of robbery and assault
and battery
Document Page
PRE-SENTENCE REPORT
Offender’s Version Ms. Nahol is guilty with frivolity. Frivolity can be a crime if the
perpetrator foresees the possibility of death, but without sufficient reason
for this, counts on its prevention. At the same time, the guilty person can
consciously count on his own strength, the actions of other persons, any
specific circumstances. He deliberately violates certain precautionary
rules. These may be actions contrary to the given science or professional
rules, prohibited by law, but not a crime, as well as in the case. Ms Nahol
is a person foresees the possibility of socially dangerous consequences of
his act, but arrogantly counts on their prevention. With carelessness, a
person does not foresee the possibility of socially dangerous
consequences of his act, although it should have been and could have
foreseen them. In most cases, Based on the rule of law, proof of guilt in
case of criminal arrogance should consist in establishing the obligation to
foresee the consequences (objective criterion) and the ability of a
particular person to such foresight (subjective criterion). According to
most scholars, an objective criterion is normative in nature, which implies
that any person who violates the precautionary rules existing in society
"must foresee the possible socially dangerous consequences of this
violation." It is easy to notice that there is a clash with another
presumption, very convenient for practice, but bearing the potential for
innocent responsibility. The person’s prediction of the possibility of
socially dangerous consequences of his act is the intellectual element of
criminal frivolity, and the arrogant calculation without sufficient reason to
prevent them is his volitional element (Lumencandela nd.).
Criminal Record Ms. Nahol has been involved in the criminal justice system since she was
14, when she was adjudicated for car theft, for which she was placed on
juvenile probation. However, she violated her probation, however, upon
reinstatement of the probation, she successfully completed a 36-month
probational term. As an adult, Ms. Nahol has been sentenced three
previous times, as an adult, for various crimes including shoplifting,
burglary and possession of a controlled substance. She successfully
completed her probation for these offenses one year ago. Ms. Nahol
states that she stole the car when she was 14 because she wanted her
friends to think that she was cool and not a nerd.
Date
Location
Disposition She is convicted since she was found guilty of robbery and assault and
battery
Document Page
Running head: PRE-SENTENCE REPORT 4
Current Personal
History
Ms. Nahol has her high school diploma; she has not spoken to any of her
family members in more than a year. But states that she is very close
friends who let her crash at their house anytime she wants. She spends
her time thinking about her future and is interested in earning her degree
in criminal justice from Strayer University and after obtaining her degree
she wants to be a juvenile probation officer.
Recommendation After completing five years in prison, Ms. Nahol should receive
appropriate rehabilitation services. Ms. Nahol, when rehabilitated
properly could become law abiding citizen. Her criminal acts are due to
her inability to control her aspirations and her impatience. If rehabilitated
through social training, she will be not only a law abiding citizen but also
a prospective juvenile probation officer
During probation, it is recommended that Ms. Nahol be trained on values
such as patience, humility and love. This is because her crime behavior is
attributable to pride. The volitional moment of criminal frivolity consists
in an unreasonable, without sufficient reason, arrogant (frivolous)
calculation of the prevention of socially dangerous consequences
(Atkinson, 2005). This feature of the volitional content of frivolity is due
to the viciousness of the person’s intellectual activity, an incorrect
assessment of her strength, factors and other circumstances, which, in her
opinion, should have prevented the onset of socially dangerous
consequences (Steube, 2016). By virtue of his misconception regarding
the true nature of factors and circumstances, a person chooses a socially
dangerous way of fulfilling his intentions, being confident that she will be
able to avoid the onset of criminal consequences.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
Running head: PRE-SENTENCE REPORT 5
References
Atkinson, R. D. (2005). Prison Labor Benefits Inmates and the Economy (Links to an external
site.). In K. Bailey (Ed.), At Issue. How Should Prisons Treat Inmates?. San Diego, CA:
Greenhaven Press. Retrieved from https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/EJ3010016217/GPS?
u=lirn50909&sid=GPS&xid=e6b8347e
Lumencandela (nd.). Section 2.5: Theories of Punishment. Retrieved from:
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-bmcc-criminaljustice/chapter/section-2-5-theories-
of-punishment/
Manatee County Sheriff (2016). Life. Retrieved from:
http://www.manateesheriff.com/Programs/LIFEProgram
Steube, B. (2016). Everyone benefits when inmates work in manatee county. American Jails, 30(5),
57-61.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 5
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]