Race, Class, and Gender in Precolonial America to Mid 1700s
Verified
Added on 2023/04/08
|5
|974
|320
AI Summary
This essay discusses the race, class, and gender intersectionality in precolonial America to the mid 1700s, and the methods of resisting and overcoming oppression used by various groups.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: PRECOLONIAL AMERICA TO MID 1700S PRECOLONIAL AMERICA TO MID 1700S Name of the Student Name of the University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1PRECOLONIAL AMERICA TO MID 1700S The race, class and gender dimensions had undergone drastic changes ever since the arrival and colonization of the Europeans on the continent of North America. The natives had gradually started adopting the practices and ways of the Europeans as a result of colonial domination and the changes in the societal structure and the level of economic production brought about by it. Nascent signs of European colonization had began in the 15thcentury when Columbus had discovered North America (Sokolow, 2016). Ever since then gradually people from Europe started settling in America and the process of displacement and full-fledged colonization had been possible by mid 1600s in the 17thcentury (Sokolow, 2016). In this essay the focus of discussion shall be upon the race, class and gender intersectionality in pre colonial America to the mid 1700s, and the methods of resisting and overcoming the oppression used by the various groups. The system of race was something which was absent among the native Indians, however they were divided into small groups on the basis of tribes. The superordination and subordination on the basis of race had begun with the arrival of the Europeans. The civilizing mission conducted by the Europeans on the native people through Christianization and making them give up on their traditional practices to adopt the European lifestyle proves the fact that the Europeans asserted their superiority over the natives (Sokolow, 2016). The factor of racial superiority and inferiority is much more applicable in the relationship of the Europeans vis-à-vis the Natives, not within the community of the Native Americans as such. The Natives had their own system of hierarchy within their community and that was of slaves and the masters, however the slaves were neither meted out with ill treatment nor exploitation. The in-group and out-group division that existed was more applicable among the various tribes and the basis of claiming superiority was power and not race. The native had put up resistance against the colonizers from imposing
2PRECOLONIAL AMERICA TO MID 1700S European values and the vehement opposition to Christianization by brutalizing the Jesuit priests bear testimony to it (Lindo et al., 2016). However, with the introduction of the concept of private property and ownership the system of class became an integral part of the way of life of the native people. The class disparity between the Europeans and the Natives was on the basis of the intellectual and racial superiority of the former. The system of class domination had also percolated among the Natives, and that can proven from the slave trade boom that had occurred between 1670 to 1715 whereby native Americans had traded in slaves and war captives with the colonizers (Sokolow, 2016). Estimates show that the trade of native slaves had been more in number than the import of Negro slaves. The culture of slave keeping was also adopted by the natives from the Europeans and the slaves were supposed to manage the farms of the native lords. The class division was however naturalized and no resistance was put up against it. Rather, the natives had voluntarily engaged in offering of slaves or war captives to the Europeans to reach at an agreement with them (Easterly & Levine, 2016). By and large the natives were matrilineal and equality among the sexes prevailed, except in few tribes like the Omaha, Osage and Ponca which were patrilineal. The women played important role in the choosing of the tribe chieftain, in choosing of the bride, in matters of divorce and property. Gender variant persons, whom in modern parlance are referred to as transgenders were considered as people born with two spirits as they could perform the role of the opposite sex and were highly esteemed as God. Homosexuality was tolerated. However the women and the gender variant persons were rendered second class citizens by the European colonization. That no sexism prevailed in pre-colonial period would be an understatement as women did not go to war, they were in charge of domestic labour and agriculture was the only
3PRECOLONIAL AMERICA TO MID 1700S activity that they indulged in along with men outside the domain of household chores (Sokolow, 2016). However, gender equality prevailed by and large, and to be precisely correct the domination of the women in certain affairs like the moving of the groom to the bride’s house and the children taking the family name of their mothers were signs of the natives being matriarchal. Post colonization, the natives had adopted patriarchy, and that too with little or no resistance (Cameron, Kelton & Swedlund, 2015). The changes that were brought about in the societal structure of the native Americans were thus accepted without much resistance excepting the case when the colonizers tried to impose Christianity on them. The acquiescence of the natives was a result of the power dynamics which favoured the Europeans and they were rendered powerless. It is thus the materialization of the rule that ideology of the ruling class becomes the ideology of all the people.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4PRECOLONIAL AMERICA TO MID 1700S References Cameron, C. M., Kelton, P., & Swedlund, A. C. (Eds.). (2015).Beyond Germs: Native Depopulation in North America. University of Arizona Press. Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (2016). The European origins of economic development.Journal of Economic Growth,21(3), 225-257. Lindo, J., Huerta-Sánchez, E., Nakagome, S., Rasmussen, M., Petzelt, B., Mitchell, J., ... & Malhi, R. S. (2016). A time transect of exomes from a Native American population before and after European contact.Nature communications,7, 13175. Sokolow, J. A. (2016).The Great Encounter: Native Peoples and European Settlers in the Americas, 1492-1800: Native Peoples and European Settlers in the Americas, 1492- 1800. Routledge.