Green Supply Chain Retention and Competitive Advantages

This report analyzes the relationship between green supply chain retention and competitive advantages in corporate governance. It explores the impact, similarities, and differences between the two concepts, highlighting their role in sustainable business growth and profitability. The report also discusses the importance of transparency in corporate governance and the avoidance of violations. The findings suggest that integrating green supply chain practices and leveraging competitive advantages can lead to higher business efficacy and strategic growth.

Preparation for dissertation

Table of Content
INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................3
Literature review .........................................................................................................................3
CONCLUSION ...............................................................................................................................6
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................6

INTRODUCTION
The literature review will be analysing various aspects of green supply chain retention,
analysis of differences and similarities, terms of various aspects within working avenues and
along with concept of competitive advantages and impact on functional scenarios. The report
will be further discussing relationship between these two.
Research topic: Violation of transparency in corporate governance
Literature review
Green supply retention/sustainability

As per the views of Ghadimi, Wang and Lim, (2019), green supply chain refers to idea
of developing sustainable growth business environment for keeping up growth efficacy
scenarios and also for generating new advanced work growth metrics to keep up targets attained.
Author expresses facts where the retention of supply chain development has correlation with
retaining synergy aspects to be largely active for bringing on keen growth domains. It
enhances dynamic adaptability in business targets for forming strength within targets ,
competitive goodwill and alignment between suppliers and consumers. As noted by Martins,
and Pato, (2019), similarities between both are based on fact that both enable transparency of
corporate violation to be framed on within longer run and strategically build promotional
scenarios widely. Differences between them are based on fact that green supply chain
productively brings strategic growth implementation actively, also to keep up efficacy goals
widely at frame (Zimo., Tyan. and Sroufe, 2019). Impact on green supply chain refers to the
aspects that it enables management aspects to be competent, functionally active for monitoring
work progression within new horizons and also to be developing smarter work growth goals
within future effective goals. As elucidated by Rebs, Brandenburg and Seuring, (2019), the
green supply chain retention can be understood to be widely analysed as one of the largely
competitive concept for keeping up success factors at monitored , business goals to be
strategically framed and also to productively enhance goodwill avenues. Sustainability factor is
widely build on within functional avenues to keep up higher informative domains active for
diversity within strategies and also for leveraging higher strategic potentialities (.Saeed,. and
Kersten, 2019).
Competitive advantages/awards
As per the views of Akter, amd et.al (2020), competitive advantages have strong role to
play for bringing on informative growth diversity among company business standards and
operational efficacy within longer time run for bringing on keen productive diversity. Author has
analysed in research papers about role of competitive advantages such as m price strategies ,
diversity within human resources and also business promotional strategies which play keen role
to enhance brand value on larger domains. Competitive awards on other hand are based on new
growth parameters having high focus to bring on keen new efficacy aspects, for higher business
targets and shareholders goodwill. As noted by Boiko, Kwilinski and Boiko, (2019), it can be
also analysed that there are factors of similarities where competitive advantages and awards

enhance brand value, higher strategic vision and productive business targets at play for keeping
up keen business efficacy at frame. Differences are based on fact that competitive advantages
enhance long term scale productivity for business avenues, whereas the competitive rewards on
other hand are gained after business is able to frame larger shareholder goodwill. As elucidated
by Gareche, Hosseini and Taheri, (2019), theses factors have also been keenly analysed to be
strongly developed as highly strong for technical innovation and keen efficacy within business
competitive targets Impact on corporate governance issue, avoidance of transparency can be
understood to be widely strong for keeping up informational growth diversity and also to
pertain high focus on bringing new domains structural profits in business scenarios. As per the
views of Do and Nguyen,(2020), both enable companies to keep growth parameters at frame for
larger scale functional strength, higher informative strength within industrial growth avenues
and also to upscale targets competitively. There are various metrics of corporate governance for
building new competitive growth goals, harness functional aspects within diverse range of
industries and also to form best strategical vision on longer frame (Blundo and et.al, 2019).
Relationship between the 2 concepts
As per the views of Abdullah, Darsono and Said, (2019) there is strong interrelationship
between two concepts where green supply chain retention and competitive advantages enable
business culture operational scenarios to be innovatively wide within industry avenues and also
to evolve on larger effective metrics. It can be also analysed that author has analysed in research
papers that there is high keen focus on diversity development and complexity enrichments for
gaining stronger working domains strengths. The literatures have in detail analysed varied
domains of competitive commercial excellence within working scenarios for higher business
targets and also to be active on corporate governance development. Similarities between both
concepts are based on aspect that both are enabling businesses to be sustainable and
competitively diverse for bringing on best results, higher profits and also recognised goodwill
among companies new efficacy horizons. As per the views of Shmygo. and Kasianok, (2020),
differences between two concepts are based on parameters where green supply chain is highly
new advanced and competitive scenarios for keeping up new profit within businesses and also to
be strategically active. There is wide informative growth worked on to evolve on keen efficacy
aspects , for higher domains and be sustainable within new targets and also be commercially

active for larger dynamic growth goals informatively. As opinionated by Zhang, Song and He.,
(2020) ,the green supply chain and sustainable business competitive efficacy enhance for
keeping up targets at frame , also to up scale goals informatively for generating larger
informative diversity on longer frame (Ukko, Nasiri. and Rantala, 2019).
CONCLUSION
The report has concluded varied aspects of similarities within concepts of green supply
chain factors and competitive factors for keeping up higher business goals informatively, also
the integrated varied growth domains have strong role to play larger technical innovation and
commercial growth. The report has also concluded strategic analysis of research papers where
best metrics of commercial growth innovation and also enhance business metrics, which yields
higher functional scope for targeting higher keen business domains (Danso and et.al 2019).
REFERENCES
Books and journals

Abdullah, N. H. N., Darsono, J. T and Said, J., 2019. Improving accountability and
sustainability through value creation and dynamic capabilities: an empirical study in
public interest companies. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19.
Akter, S., amd et.al 2020. Reshaping competitive advantages with analytics capabilities in
service systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 159, p.120180.
Blundo, D.S.,and et.al, 2019. Sustainability as source of competitive advantages in mature
sectors. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment.
Boiko, V., Kwilinski, A., Misiuk, M. and Boiko, L., 2019. Competitive advantages of wholesale
markets of agricultural products as a type of entrepreneurial activity: the experience
of Ukraine and Poland. Economic Annals-XXI, 175(1-2), pp.68-72.
Danso, A.,and et.al 2019. Stakeholder integration, environmental sustainability orientation and
financial performance. Journal of business research.
Do, B. and Nguyen, N., 2020. The Links between Proactive Environmental Strategy,
Competitive Advantages and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study in
Vietnam. Sustainability. 12(12), p.4962.
Gareche, M., Hosseini, S.M. and Taheri, M., 2019. A comprehensive literature review in
competitive advantages of businesses. International Journal of Advanced Studies in
Humanities and Social Science, 8(3, pp. 223-309.), pp.223-240.
Ghadimi, P., Wang, C. and Lim, M.K., 2019. Sustainable supply chain modeling and analysis:
Past debate, present problems and future challenges. Resources, Conservation and
Recycling, 140, pp.72-84.
Martins, C.L. and Pato, M.V., 2019. Supply chain sustainability: A tertiary literature
review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 225. pp.995-1016.
Rebs, T., Brandenburg, M. and Seuring, S., 2019. System dynamics modeling for sustainable
supply chain management: A literature review and systems thinking
approach. Journal of cleaner production, 208, pp.1265-1280.
Saeed, M.A. and Kersten, W., 2019. Drivers of sustainable supply chain management:
identification and classification. Sustainabilit . 11(4), p.1137.
Shmygol, N. and Kasianok, M., 2020. Analysis of financial and economic sustainability of
enterprises based on the use of accounting and analytical instruments. The Scientific
Journal of Cahul State University “Bogdan Petriceicu Hasdeu” Economic and
Engineering Studies, 7(1), pp.29-35.
Ukko, J., Nasiri, M., Saunila, M. and Rantala, T., 2019. Sustainability strategy as a moderator in
the relationship between digital business strategy and financial performance. Journal
of Cleaner Production, 236, p.117626.
Zhang, H., Song, M. and He, H., 2020. Achieving the success of sustainability development
projects through big data analytics and artificial intelligence
capability. Sustainability, 12(3), p.949.
Zimon, D., Tyan, J. and Sroufe, R., 2019. Implementing Sustainable Supply Chain Management:
Reactive, Cooperative, and Dynamic Models. Sustainability, 11(24), p.7227.