This document provides an overview of the principles of economics, including microeconomics and macroeconomics. It covers topics such as budget constraints, profit maximization under perfect competition, real exchange rates, and equilibrium vs disequilibrium unemployment.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Principles of Economics 1
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Contents Section A – Microeconomics...........................................................................................................3 A1. Budget constraint.............................................................................................................3 Section B – Microeconomics...........................................................................................................6 Question B1............................................................................................................................6 Section C – Macroeconomics........................................................................................................11 C1 Real Exchange Rate (RER).............................................................................................11 Section D – Macroeconomics........................................................................................................12 Question D3..........................................................................................................................12 References......................................................................................................................................16 2
Section A – Microeconomics A1. Budget constraint Budget constraint isterm used in economics to describe all ofdifferent combinations of products and services which a buyer may buy considering current costs and his/her income. To evaluate consumer preferences,consumer philosophy employs the principles ofbudget limit as well aspreference map. Intwo-good example, all definitions have a ready-to-use graphical representation (Ogunjuyigbe, Ayodele and Akinola, 2017). Customer is limited bybudget so they could only buy as much asincome allows. The equation of a budget constraint is P{x}x+P{y}y = m, where P_x is price of good X, as well as P_y is price of product Y, as well as m = income. In this regard following are certain key uses of budget constraints: Individual choice Consumer behavior is a matter of maximization. It entails maximizing our utility by making the best of our scarce resources. The only factor that restrictsconsumption isown budget, because customers are irresistible and utility functionality rise with quantities. In common, the budget collection (all package options on or underbudget line) reflects all potential packages of products that a person can afford based on their incomes and product costs. When acting 3
rationally, a buyer should opt to buy products at the level onpreference map wheremost preferred accessible indifference curve becomes tangent tobudget constraint. Tangent point(xy coordinate) reflects the number of products x as well as y that a buyer can buy to getmost out ofbudget. It's worth noting that the best consumption package isn't necessarily an interior option. When optimality condition's response corresponds to an unfeasible package, the consumer's best option would becorner solution, implying that the products or inputsperfect replacements. The expansion direction isline that connects all levels of tangency betweenindifference curve as well asbudget constraint. The formula is extended to includetwo-dimensional budget constraints: 4
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
To describe the form ofcurve ongraph, rearrangeequation as follows: International economics:Production-possibilityfrontier isconstraint that is similar tobudget constraint in that it shows limits on a nation's ability to produce various products due to a scarcity of available variables of productions.Autarky also imposes a cap on individual consumptionswithin the region. The gains of foreign exchange, on the other hand, are usually explainedby allowinga changein andtradepartner'sconsumptions-possibilityfrontiers, allowing access tomore attractive indifference slope (Wang, Shi, Wang and Wang, 2018).The budget limit ofeconomy (its CPF) is established byterms-of-trade (TOT) asdownward-sloped curvewithslopeequivalenttoeconomy'sTOTsin"toolbox"Hecksher-Ohlinaswellas Krugman frameworks of foreign trade. (TOTs are calculated usingprice ratio Px/Py, wherein x denotesexportable commodity while y denotesimportable commodity). 5
Borrowing and Lending: By investing and leasing, budget limits may be extended outwardsor contracted inward. A buyer may opt to forego spending in future times in exchange for additional consumption during the borrowing time through borrowing forperiod, normally atinterest rate r. Borrowing willincreasebudgetconstraintintimeframewhilereducingbudgetrestrictionsinfuture. Customers may also opt to lendmoney in the present time, normally atrate of l. Lending reduces the existing budget limit thus increasingbudget constraint inprospect. Section B – Microeconomics Question B1 (a). Calculation of profit maximising quantity and price under perfect competition: To find the maximum set market demand equal to market supply: 90 – 2Q Solving for Q, you get Q = 45. Plugging 45 back into either the market demand curve or the market supply curve to drive P = 0. 6
(b) Sinceperfectly competitive firm functions asprice taker, the net income is calculated by multiplyingspecified selling price byquantity of output thatfirm selects. Demand curve as used byperfectly competitive business. P erfectly competitive businesscould sell eitherrelatively lowerquantity like Ql orrelatively higherquantity like Qh atmarket price P becauseperceived demand curve is flat. Perfect Competitor as well asMonopolist's Perceived Demand Curve.A perfectly competitive business considersdemand slope it is confronted with to be smooth. Because of the flat form, the company may sell either a small quantity (Ql) orlarge quantity (Qh) atsame price.Monopolist seesdemand curve as identical to the consumer demand graph that is downwards-sloping for most commodities. On a result, ifmonopolist prefers a large level of outputs(Qh), it could only chargelow price (Pl); onother hand, ifmonopolist chooses a lowerlevelofoutput,thiscanchargehigherprice.Monopolist'sroleistopickthebest combination (Browning and Zupan, 2020). (c) Totalincomeminustotalexpenseequalseconomicbenefit,wherebycostiscalculated ineconomic sense called opportunity cost. While total expense exceeds total income,economic loss (adverse economic profit) occurs. With our idea of economic gains, it's easy to see that, inlong term, they would still equal tozero in theperfect competition. Assume there are 2 sectors ineconomy, and companies in Sector A are profitable. By example, companies in Sector A receive a higher return than companies in Sector B. As a result, businesses in Sector B benefit less than those in Sector A. Economic declines are being experienced by businesses in Sector B. Given quick entering and exiting, several companies in Sector B would leave to pursue the 7
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
higher profits achievable in Sector A. Here,supply curve in Sector B would move toleft as a result, increasing costs and earnings. Supply curve in Sector A would turn toright as former Sector B companies join Sector A, lowering income in A. The trend of companies exiting Industry B or entering Sector A will proceed until all sectors are profitable at zero. That implies a significant long-run outcome: insystem with perfectly open economies, economic income would be reduced to null in all sectors in the longerrun (Mohammadi and Rezvani, 2017). Figure below"Eliminating Economic Profits inLong Run" depicts the mechanism by which admission would reduce economic profits inlong run, depending on the condition depicted in Figure ApplyingMarginal Decision Rule.Cost ofpound of radishes is currently$0.40. Mr. Gortari's estimated net cost eachpound is $0.26 eachpound, based on a monthly harvest of 6,700 poundsradishes. $0.14 ($0.40 $0.26) profit each unit Mr. Gortari therefore makes a monthly profit totalling $938 (=$0.14 6,700). Figure1Eliminating Economic Profits in the Long Run (d) Market model focused on the premise thatlarge number of businesses manufacture equal products purchased bylarge number of consumers is known as theperfect competition. Perfect competition framework also predicts that new businesses can easily entermarket and old firms 8
can easily exit. Finally, it is assumed that both buyers as well as sellers possess full knowledge of market trends (Yi-ran, 2018). In this regard following some key assumptions underlying perfectly competitive model hold in UK potatoes market, as follows: Identical Goods In suchperfectly competitivemarket for potatoes, one unit of potatoescannot be distinguished from the others on any grounds.In potatoes market, goods are identical and all sellers sell potatoes. A Large Number of Buyers and Sellers: Since there're so many purchasers and sellers no-one will have an impact on the stock price, irrespective as to how much they buyingor selling.Inperfectly competitive sector, a business can respond to price changes, but it could notinfluenceprices it spends for inputs or gets foroutput. Ease of Entry and Exit The belief that other companies will find it easier to reachperfectly competitive market means that there will be still more rivalry. Firms inmarket must contend with not onlyvast number of competitors, but alsoprospect of other competitors entering the market. We'll look at how convenience of entry relates to the long-term viability of economic income later. If entrance is simple, new businesses can be attracted easily by the prospect of highereconomic profits. This won't if getting in is tough. The ideal competition model expects that both entry and exit are easy. The presumption of a simple exit reinforces the assumption of a simple entrance. Assume a company is contemplating entering a certain industry. It can be simple to get in, however imagine how tough it is to get out. Providers of variables of output to industry companies, for instance, may be willing to accept new businesses as long as they sign longer-term contracts. Contracts like this could make exiting the market challenging and expensive. If this is the case, a company will be reluctant to enter the market infirst place. It is easier to enter if you have a simple escape (Mohammadi and Rezvani, 2019). Complete Information One expects that all vendors have full knowledge of markets, technologies, as well as all details related to market activity. There is no detail about manufacturing processes that a single seller requires that isn't accessible to any those sellers. When one seller has a competitive advantage over another, such as insider knowledge of a lower-cost processing process,seller could exercise 9
some leverage over market pricing—the seller will no longer beprice taker. The assumption of information supply in the ideal competition model means that information could be accessed atlowercost. Consumers and businesses are more likely to access information atreduced cost if it is available. Whatever the source,believe that it is inexpensive enough for customers and businesses to purchase and sell products and services at retail rates dictated byintersection of demandsand supply curves. 10
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Section C – Macroeconomics C1 Real Exchange Rate (RER) Realexchangeratemultipliedbypriceratiobetween2countries,P/P*,yieldsreal exchange rate (RER) amongtwo currencies. As a result,RER is eP*/P. Consider Germany's relationship withUnited States. A increase inRER may be used to indicate appreciation (asIMF can do) or decline (asIMF can do). It's all a matter of etiquette. Let's describeRER so that an increase signifies an increase in the actual exchange price of Germany. In suchexample, e isdollar-euro market price, P isaverage German value of products as well as P* isaverage US price of products. A single symbolic product, such asBig Mac,McDonald's burger served in several nations in almost equivalent varieties, can be used to calculate the realexchange ratesbetween 2 nations. Ifreal exchange rates for suchgood is 1,burger inUnited States will costsame as one in, perhaps, Germany when represented incommon currency. IfBig Mac charges $5.30 inUnited States then €4.50 in Germany, this will becase. The buying power parity ofdollar andeuro aresame in suchone-product environment (where values match exchanging rates as well asRER is 1. But let's say the burger costs €5.40 in theGermany. Which means this costs 20% more ineurozone than it does inUnited States, implying thateuro is 20percent overbought againstdollar. Sincesame good could be bought more cheaper in one nation than inother, there must be stress onnominal exchange rate levelto move if the actual exchange rate levelbecomes that overvalued. Even so, purchasing dollars, using them to purchase Big Macs inUnited States for around 1 euro, as well as then selling them in theGermany for 1.2 euros will make economic perception.Arbitrage is the practice of profiting from pricing differences. When arbitrageurs acquire dollars to acquire Big Macs to offer in theGermany, demand towards dollars increases, as doesnominal exchange rate, untilprice in both countries issame—the RER corresponds to 1 (Calderón and Kubota, 2018). Most costs, like logistics, trade restrictions and consumer tastes, obstruct a straightforward market analysis inreal world. The basic idea is that as RERs deviate, currencies are under pressure to adjust. Overvalued currencies are under stress to depreciate, while undervalued currencies are under stress to appreciation. It may get more difficult if considerations like government policy obstruct natural exchange price equilibration, whichis a common source of tradeconflicts. In the case ofBig Mac,average pricein theGermany (across all McDonald's restaurants) is around €4.50, whileaverage price inUnited 11
States is around $5.30. (as-of July 2017). Taking1.18-dollar exchange level forBig Mac in theGermany. The RER becomes 1.18 x 4.5/5.3, or 1.18. As a result, the euro does not appear to be underrated or overvalued in relation todollar atcurrent exchange rate (Guzman, Ocampo and Stiglitz, 2018). Section D – Macroeconomics Question D3 Distinction between equilibrium and disequilibrium unemployment: Thefundamentaldefinitionsoftheunemploymentareequilibriumversusdisequilibrium unemployment, which are applied to the entire labour force ofeconomy. The disparity between people who wish to takejob and people who are eager and ready to pursue employment is known as equilibrium unemployment. Wheneveraggregate demandsfor labor is lesserthanaggregate supply of labors, disequilibrium unemployment exists. Ifwage rate increases aboveequilibrium, certain people will lose their jobs. This is referred to as real wagesunemployment or traditional unemployment.ItisdepictedasthedisequilibriumunemploymentintheFigure1.D isequilibrium wage scale would not last longer if the labor market is open to revert to equilibrium. Wage prices would collapse as a result of the surplus labor supply. However, if incomes remain stagnant (downwards), this will not be likely. And at maximum employment any unemployment can occur because economies are constantly changing (Hagemann, 2020). 12
However, there's a chance that there will be unemployment atequilibrium wage. And if the market for labor is in balance withsupply of labor, there will also be unemployed citizens. This may be that they are trapped inunemployment pit, earning greater on insurance than they can ever in jobs, or since the market in which they worked has shrunk, and their talents are no longer neededanduselessinotherfields.Thisformofunemploymentknownasequilibrium unemployment, as well as it is basically frictional and organized unemployment, as seen in Figure 2 following. The X reflectsaggregate supply of labor atgoing wage, whileY represents the possible accumulatedsupplyoflaborinthefigureabove.Asaresult,XYreflectsequilibrium unemployment, which includes both frictional and systemic unemployment (Mandel and Veetil, 2020). Withinan economy, underemployment means that employees must accept positions that need less ability than they've or that pay lesseror have lesserhours than they might prefer. The intensity (or shortage of same) of the labor market determinesdegree of underemployment, whichcontinuestoincreasewheneconomyandjobs/employmentarepoor.Keynesian economists argue that stimulating the economy with deficit expenditure as well as fiscal stimulus is the only way to deal withunderemployment equilibrium situation. An economy which is 13
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
achieving maximum employment is considered to be in long-run equilibrium. When an industry isn't fully employed, it can't generate as well as it does if it were fully employed.The job deficit contributes to the demand difference.Wheneconomy's longer-run real GDP falls belowcurrent level, there's resource industrial unemployment, which leads torecession. The longer-run real GDP amount reflects what a country's economy could achieve if it were at maximum capacity. For years, lawmakers have struggled with how to truly integrate underemployed workers intoeconomy.It'sunclearifthisisduetodecliningincomesorwhetherthere'reother explanations whynumerous people fall out ofworkforce afterdeep recession (Schoder, 2020). (b)How efficiency wage theories attempt to explain the phenomenon of “sticky wages”: According tosticky wage concept, job compensation responds steadily to shifts in business efficiency oreconomy. If unemployment increases, the incomes of those who are working prefer to staysame or increase atslower pace, rather than decreasing in tandem with the drop in labour demand, as pertheory. Wages are sometimes defined as sticky-down, implying that they could quickly go upward but just move downward with difficulties (Dai, Wu and Yan, 2018). The hypothesis is credited to economist nameJohn Maynard Keynes,coined the term "nominal rigidity" to describephenomenon. Employee pays areresistant to downturn even in bad economic times, according tosticky wage principle. That's because employers will resist a wage cut, because if profits slip, a company will look for ways to cut costs elsewhere, as well as by layoffs. True incomes are reduced by the impact of inflation since wages appear"sticky-down." "Stickiness," a central component of Keynesian economicstheory, has also been observed in otherfields,suchassomecostsandtaxeslevels.Stickinessisbusinesssituationin whichnominal price is resistant to transition (Hirobe, 2020). Although it is most often associated with incomes, stickiness can also relate to prices withinmarket, and is referred to as price stickiness. Because ofasymmetry between pricing stiffness and stability, the overall price range or average baseline of prices withinmarket, could become sticky. Such asymmetry implies that prices would always lead to conditions that cause them to rise while resisting forces that drive them down. This suggests that scaleswouldn't respond as easily to major negative economic changes because they would normally. Wage stickiness iswidely held hypothesis by economists, while other perfectionist neoclassical economists question its validity. Wages beingsticky for a variety of reasons, according to proponents ofhypothesis. Any employees are union activists with long-term employment or collectivesbargaining rights and an organization does not wish to 14
subject itself topoor news or public reputation synonymous through wage cuts. When stickiness hits the economy, a transition with one direction is preferred overchange inother, as per sticky wage concept.Because wages are considered sticky, they may tend to progress upward far more than downwards, resulting in an annual pay trend of upwards movement. This phenomenon is known as "creep" (price creepifreferring to prices) or"ratchet effect." Stickiness, according to some experts, can be infectious, spreading from one infected region of the economy to those that are untouched. Owing to competition for workers and businesses' attempts to keep salaries competitive,entry of thewage-stickiness in to region or business segment often leads to wage- stickiness across other regions. Stickiness is believed to havenumber of other broad-based impacts on the world economies.Overshooting, for instance, is a process wherein foreign currency exchangesratesoverreactineffort to correct for market stickiness, resultingin significant fluctuations in exchangesrates across the world (Amaral and MacGee, 2017). 15
References Books and Journals: Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O., Ayodele, T.R. and Akinola, O.A., 2017. User satisfaction-induced demand side load management in residential buildings with user budget constraint.Applied Energy,187, pp.352-366. Wang, Y., Shi, J., Wang, R., Liu, Z. and Wang, L., 2018. Siting and sizing of fast charging stations in highway network with budget constraint.Applied Energy,228, pp.1255- 1271. Browning, E.K. and Zupan, M.A., 2020.Microeconomics: Theory and applications. John Wiley & Sons. Mohammadi,A.andRezvani,M.H.,2017,December.Optimizationofvirtualmachines placement based on microeconomics theory in cloud network. In2017 IEEE 4th international conference on knowledge-based engineering and innovation (KBEI)(pp. 0299-0303). IEEE. Yi-ran, Z.H.O.U., 2018. Application of Microeconomics Theory in Accounting under New Situation.Value Engineering, p.01. Mohammadi, A. and Rezvani, M.H., 2019. A novel optimized approach for resource reservation in cloud computing using producer–consumer theory of microeconomics.The Journal of Supercomputing,75(11), pp.7391-7425. Calderón, C. and Kubota, M., 2018. Does higher openness cause more real exchange rate volatility?.Journal of International Economics,110, pp.176-204. Guzman, M., Ocampo, J.A. and Stiglitz, J.E., 2018. Real exchange rate policies for economic development.World Development,110, pp.51-62. Hagemann, H., 2020.Productivity, Profitability, Wages and Unemployment: The Impact of Malinvaud's Theory of Rationing in Germany(No. 2020-54). Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France. Mandel,A.andVeetil,V.P.,2020.DisequilibriumPropagationofQuantityConstraints: Application to the COVID Lockdowns.Available at SSRN 3631014. Schoder, C., 2020. A Keynesian Dynamic Stochastic Disequilibrium model for business cycle analysis.Economic Modelling,86, pp.117-132. Hirobe,T.,2020.IsStabilityForRegionalDisparitiesOfUnemploymentRatesTruly Mysterious? An Analysis From Statistical Approach.Regional Science Inquiry,12(1), pp.253-260. Dai, X., Wu, J. and Yan, L., 2018. A spatial evolutionary study of technological innovation talents’ sticky wages and technological innovation efficiency based on the perspective of sustainable development.Sustainability,10(11), p.4201. Amaral, P.S. and MacGee, J.C., 2017. Monetary shocks and sticky wages in the US great contraction: A multi-sector approach.Journal of Monetary Economics,92, pp.112-129. 16