Prison as Punishment: A Behavior-Analytic Evaluation

Instructions: Your reflective journal will be structured specifically around lecture and online activities. At the end of each lecture you will be asked to reflect on a theme, scenario, case, question or debate and think about your own position on it. Your responses will generally align with a theory that is adopted in this unit. For the journal, you will select TWO OR THREE topics, and augment and refine your reflection through what you discuss or debate in your online discussions. In your final reflective journal, you must respond to the below questions: 1.Did you hold assumptions about any of the topics addressed in this unit? Have any of your assumptions been overturned? (i.e have your ideas, if any, about punishment changed over the length of the course?)

Running head: PRISON PUNISHMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
PRISON PUNISHMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Name of Student
Name of University
Author Note

1PRISON PUNISHMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Introduction
In this paper I will be discussing about the topics that had been covered in Criminal Justice.
Before joining the class I had certain assumptions about some topics which were proved to be
not completely right, I will also discuss those assumptions. In furtherance to this I will
discuss the topics that I felt were relevant. In this paper I will also discuss the theories
covered in the course which appealed to me the most and which I might use in my future
academic works.
Assumptions
Before this course I assumed that an individual is punished only because of the crime they
have committed. I was unaware of the racism or its effect in the Australian criminal justice
system. But over the course of this lecture I found out that there are multiple factors that
influence an offender’s punishment in the criminal justice system. Some factors that
influence the punishment level and rate include race, gender and ethnicity of a person. One of
the major influencer of criminal justice is the gender of the offender. Initially it was an
unquestionable category in the Australian penal system. However, since the 1970s the
debates were seen to arise about the gender bias within the penal system. The debates on the
gender of the offenders were articulated conventionally by the distinction between the sex or
gender of the offender while they are punished. Although not defined exactly why, but crime
has always been related with the concept of hegemonic masculinity (Carter 2018). Through
the perspective in criminology violence has always been associated with masculinity, even
though it has been observed that violence is committed against both women and men in the
same rate. Another factor that I have learned in the topic of masculinity in crime is that the
prison is considered as the site of struggle between masculinity and the hierarchy existing in

2PRISON PUNISHMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
masculinity. The hierarchy which exists in the prison system is reinforced by physical
violence. The prisoners and guards exert dominance by way of the concept of hegemonic
masculinity (Maycock and Hunt 2018). The role of women in the field of crime and criminal
justice had been largely ignored by the penal system. However, the supporters of the feminist
theories have highly criticized the male dominance over the criminal justice system. From the
1970s the feminist thinkers have considered the women to be the center of their research in
the penal system (Sloan 2018). The role of women in crime and criminal justice system has
been explored by way of various theoretical perspectives such as radicalism, liberalism, post-
modernism and Marxism.
Topic standing out for Me
The most stood out topic for me was the over representation of the aboriginals in the prison
system in Australia. The rate over representation of Australian aboriginals in the prison is
considered as highest in the world (Rudin 2016). This is an alarming concern as it often
portrays the racial discrimination that exist in the Australian criminal justice system (Tubex,
Blagg and Tulich 2018). As per the 2012 statistics the aboriginals represented a little over
27% of the total prison population in Australian criminal justice system. Almost 2000
aboriginals approximately in every 100000 adults are imprisoned in a standard manner
(Australia.gov.au 2020). This rate has been considered as being 15 times higher than non-
indigenous people whose imprisonment rate is 129 in every 100000 adult. The juveniles in
the indigenous communities are 28 times more likely to get detained than their non-
indigenous counterparts and the rate of imprisonment among the women from the indigenous
communities is 29% times higher than their non-indigenous counterparts. A major concern
raised in the topic is the growth of imprisonment of indigenous women in the criminal justice
system in Australia at an alarming rate. another thing that student in a topic for me was

3PRISON PUNISHMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
normalisation of the prison culture among the indigenous people (Humanrights 2019).
Getting detained by the police is such a common experience among the man in the
indigenous community that it has been argued that entering into person has been rite of
passage for them(White, 2015). One such reason for over representation of the indigenous
communities is that in such communities there are recreational facilities for the youth then
there is in a prison (Trotter, Baidawi and Evans 2015). Another reason for a high criminal
record among the aboriginals is that there is very low job opportunities or social sanctions
approved for them.
Theories that would be useful in Future academic work
One of the theoretical that I found that would be useful for my future academic works is the
restorative justice. By the help of restorative justice theory the offender is organised to meet
with the victim for the purpose of reconciliation (Council 2016). The main focus in the
restorative justice theory of punishment is the rehabilitation of the criminals by way of
reconciliation with victims to whom they have committed the crime. This theory of
punishment provides the criminals with a chance of being responsible towards their
misconducts and helps them to become a responsible law abiding citizen (Van Ness and
Strong 2018). The restorative justice theory of punishment has been considered as a genuine
and oppositional alternative towards the theory of punishment of retributive justice (Maruna
2016). Restorative justice puts together a collection of many programs within the traditional
system of criminal justice. Some of the methods used in the criminal justice system in NSW
are conferencing, circle sentencing, and reintegrative shaming (Joudo-Larsen 2014). This
theory will help me in understanding different and conventional approaches in punishment.
As my course is related to prison punishments the restorative justice theory would help me to

4PRISON PUNISHMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
get a perspective of whether desistance towards crime can be best achieved by the
conventional or traditional approach in punishing offenders.
Conclusion
In this paper I have discussed in brief about a few topics that had been covered in Criminal
Justice studies. As stated earlier I had certain assumptions about the prison and punishment
systems practiced in the penal system in Australia which were corrected by way of this study.
I also learned about the theoretical perspectives of various models of punishments one of
which I have discussed in this paper as I find it to be appealing and useful for my future
academic work.

5PRISON PUNISHMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Reference
Australia.gov.au. (2020). Our people | australia.gov.au. Retrieved 25 January 2020, from
https://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/our-country/our-people
Carter, K., 2018. Masculinity in prison. In Gender and Qualitative Research (1996) (pp. 6-
21). Routledge.
Council, R.J., 2016. What is restorative justice.
Humanrights (2019). Social Justice and Native Title Reports | Australian Human Rights
Commission. [online] Humanrights.gov.au. Available at:
https://www.humanrights.gov.au/our-work/aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-social-
justice/projects/social-justice-and-native
Joudo-Larsen, J., 2014. Restorative justice in the Australian criminal justice system. AIC
reports. Research and Public Policy series., p.v.
Maruna, S., 2016. Desistance and restorative justice: it’s now or never.
Maycock, M. and Hunt, K. eds., 2018. New perspectives on prison masculinities. Springer.
Rudin, J., 2016. Aboriginal peoples and the criminal justice system.
Sloan, J., 2018. Saying the unsayable: Foregrounding men in the prison system. In New
Perspectives on Prison Masculinities (pp. 123-144). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Trotter, C., Baidawi, S. and Evans, P., 2015. Good practice in community-based supervision
of Aboriginal youth offenders. Australian Social Work, 68(1), pp.5-18.

6PRISON PUNISHMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Tubex, H., Blagg, H. and Tulich, T., 2018. Western Australian penal culture and indigenous
over representation: Evaluating 25 years of law, policy and practice. UW Austl. L. Rev., 43,
p.264.
Van Ness, D.W. and Strong, K.H., 2014. Restoring justice: An introduction to restorative
justice. Routledge.
White, R., 2015. Indigenous young people and hyperincarceration in Australia. Youth
Justice, 15(3), pp.256-270.