Managing Product and Service Innovation

This report focuses on Save the Children's efforts to protect children from abuse, neglect, violence, and exploitation. It also discusses the importance of child protection for a country's national development. The report then delves into the topic of innovation in business, specifically the use of effectiveness frameworks to improve outcomes for people living in poverty. It provides guidance on how to develop an effectiveness framework and what it should include. Finally, the report outlines the development of a plan for implementing an effectiveness framework.

Running Header: Managing Product and Service Innovation
Managing Product and Service Innovation
Authors Name:
Authors ID:

VaesManaging Product and Service Innovation
Executive summary
Based on the below executed examination it has been assessed that the beneath condensed
report has been centred around the sparing the kids, illuminating their issues and
consequently improving their lives. Kid security should be a need; kids encounter manhandle
disregard, savagery, and abuse in every one of the nations are the significant activities
executed by the association on which the report is engaged. A great many youngsters are
influenced and significantly more are in danger. Kid insurance is, along these lines, a key
need for Save the Children's local and global projects, in both advancement and helpful
settings. The business association is key autonomous child insurance on-screen character all
inclusive, with longer experience of working in association with common society
associations, kid drove activities, governments and other key performing artists to stop all
types of viciousness against youngsters. Child assurance disappointments influence advance
in all segments' Protecting kids from brutality, mishandle, misuse, and disregard is
fundamental for them to make the most of their rights to survival, improvement and support.
Each inability to ensure youngsters has negative impacts that proceed into their grown-up life
and furthermore keeps down a nation's national improvement. By differentiate, where
youngsters are secured, their wellbeing, instruction, and prosperity are enhanced and also
their capacity to add to society as future residents. In all settings, Save the Children is a
"double order" association that conveys for kids in both advancement and crisis settings.
Compassionate emergencies make kids much more helpless. The business entity is likewise
giving expanding regard for urbanization, as security nets are frequently debilitated as a result
of urban development.

VaesManaging Product and Service Innovation
Contents
Literature review on innovation in business..............................................................................4
Applying Framework.................................................................................................................5
Development of a plan...............................................................................................................9
Conclusion................................................................................................................................11
References................................................................................................................................12

VaesManaging Product and Service Innovation
Literature review on innovation in business
Spare the Children's approach depends on each child’s entitlement to be ensured and tended
to, in a perfect world by their own family or in a family like a situation. The business
association are reinforcing group based and national youngster insurance frameworks and we
are working in organization with governments and common society performing artists
(Schüler, Trogus, Feilkas and Kinnen, 2015). The entity advances the moral and significant
support of kids in all phases of the programming and the firm are tending to separation and
destitution to achieve the most powerless kids. Changes in enactment, arrangements,
administrations and social standards and expanded interest in youngster assurance are
important to forestall and react to all types of viciousness (Wattegama and Ping, 2015). Spare
the Children is guided by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, by other universal
instruments (Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol to
the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) and by possess Theory of Change.
The Theory of Change gives general vital direction to our projects to create and test prove
based arrangements with a view to scaling them up through promotion and association. We
are putting expanding accentuation on making a solid confirmation base by fortifying
observing, assessment, and learning (Biemans, 2018). Protecting, Save the Children means to
be a child safe association. This implies we will do all that we can to guarantee that
youngsters (and their families) we work with are free from any type of manhandle or misuse.
The business association guarantees that the program plan and usage is ok for youngsters.
Anybody speaking to the association will consistently hold fast to the most noteworthy
gauges of conduct towards kids and their families (Matsas, Pintzos, Kapnia and Mourtzis,
2017). Wherever there are concerns in regards to our own particular agents, they will be
explored genuinely and decently with due respect to inside disciplinary methods and national
lawful systems. Methodology is additionally set up to secure any youngsters whose rights
have been damaged. Obligation regarding the usage of the shielding strategy lies with Save
the Children International's Human Resource Department. Be that as it may, all staff
individuals inside the association are in charge of guaranteeing that we do no mischief and
that our youngster insurance programs don't put kids in danger. For additionally subtle
elements please observe Save the Children's Child Safeguarding Policy here. Kid security
system this technique sets out the progressions that Save the Children hopes to find in the
insurance of kids by 2015. Our youngster security procedure 2013-2015 explains the

VaesManaging Product and Service Innovation
principle targets and points we hope to accomplish. It will be effectively accomplished just
through the joint endeavours of all areas of the association.
Applying Framework
Most organizations collect a great deal of data and information on their projects. This can be
through regular reporting, research, field visits and evaluations (Browning & Yassine, 2016).
The idea of an effective framework is to ensure the data that is collected is a useful part of a
process of reflection, learning and on-going improvement. To this end, an effectiveness
framework assists NGOs to articulate ‘why' and ‘how' their operations are impacting on
poverty and social change. Fundamentally, the purpose of any effectiveness framework is to
bring about better outcomes for people living in poverty, through better projects, programs,
and development approaches. Just like a strategic plan, an effectiveness framework can take
different approaches and formats. The approaches which underpin these effectiveness
frameworks range from sets of learning questions to more complex models that build on
significant data gathering processes. Some frameworks are more conceptual, demonstrating
how an NGO's approach to assessing effectiveness is linked to the agency's values or mission,
or theory of change (Andrews, Cannon, Cannon & Low, 2014). The important commonality
in all of these frameworks is that there is a feedback loop, back into project or program
reflection and learning
Guiding principles and lessons learned to date
Keep it simple: An effectiveness framework is a way to articulate ‘why’ and ‘how’ NGOs
know their operations are impacting on poverty and social change (Laine, Korhonen &
Martinsuo, 2016). Small agencies do not need to develop complex, lengthy effectiveness
frameworks. Often, a simple diagram or two page summary of key effectiveness reporting
processes may suffice.
Define the scope: If embarking on developing an effective framework with limited resources
or mid-way through a strategic planning cycle, it is preferable for smaller NGOs to focus on
the development effectiveness of one aspect of their programs rather than their effectiveness
as an organization.
Build on existing data and information: Often, work on developing an effective framework
will highlight data and information gaps or the kind of information that needs to be collected
in the future (Subrahmanian, Lee & Granger, 2015). For smaller NGOs, it is better to

VaesManaging Product and Service Innovation
concentrate on existing monitoring and evaluation processes, making modifications to
outputs and data utilization processes, rather than creating many new data collection
processes.
Encourage consultation through the process: It is important for CEOs or senior managers to
develop the framework in consultation with head office staff and country staff or partner
organizations (Vaes, 2014). Gaining understanding and ownership of the framework across
the NGO is much easier if stakeholders are involved from the beginning of the process.
Think through resourcing: The work doesn’t stop at the first draft! As part of the process of
developing and drafting an effectiveness framework, it is important to think through the
resourcing required to roll out, implement and revise the framework going forward (Ma,
Artho & Sato, 2014). For smaller NGOs especially, it may be worth considering utilizing the
expertise of an external consultant to help guide the process.
Why does my organization need an effectiveness framework?
A recommended approach to thinking through the purpose behind developing an effective
framework is to map the ‘external' as well as ‘internal' drivers for formalizing your
organizations' thinking on development effectiveness (Kahn, 2014). A discussion on the
internal and external drivers for effectiveness leads nicely into a discussion on the audience
for your development effectiveness framework. Being clear about your audience will enable
you to focus on the right information in your framework and develop the appropriate content
at later stages in the process.
Examples of internal drivers:
• Suggestion/input from a Board member
• A desire to demonstrate good practice
• A desire to assess change at a project/program or sector level
• Development of an organization level theory of change (Frow, Nenonen, Payne &
Storbacka, 2015)
• A desire to develop more case studies, stories and evidence of effectiveness
• A desire to use program evidence in staff learning and capacity building
Examples of external drivers:
• Requests/feedback received from donors

VaesManaging Product and Service Innovation
• A requirement for external funding
• Sector level events, dialogue.
• Partner organization practices
• Participation in an international network (where others have effectiveness
frameworks)
What are the strengths and limitations of our existing data and information?
All organizations have processes and methods in place to monitor, evaluate or learn from
significant areas of the organization's work. These can be built into an effectiveness
framework (Seidel & O’Mahony, 2014). How? A good way to do this is for senior managers
to list what data and information are currently collected and pool together ideas around the
strengths and weakness of each aspect. This would include the data generated through a
project and program monitoring and evaluation as well as performance data collected for the
organization as a whole. If time permits, it might also be useful to undertake this exercise at a
field office or partner level – examining the strengths and weakness of data and information
collected for accountability or other purposes, and considering the appropriateness of the
timeframes for data collection.
Examples of strengths:
• The organization generates considerable case material, good practice stories, etc.
• The organizational strategy is clear and has well-defined measures on the
organization's contribution to poverty and social change (Koen, Bertels &
Kleinschmidt, 2014)
• Monitoring and evaluation reports are rich and detailed
• A ‘theory of change’ development process has been trailed in X area and some good
ideas about development effectiveness are emerging.
Examples weaknesses:
• The organization generates a lot of micro-level data not all of which is comparable
and quantifiable
• Partners are not clear about the purposes of monitoring and evaluation
• Program officers visit field contexts infrequently
• Field offices have too much work, collecting different sorts of data to fit diverse
donor requirements

VaesManaging Product and Service Innovation
• The organization has just switched to a new software for storing program information,
which is quite complicated
The aim of this second stage is to begin to list and address the strengths as well as the gaps in
the way that your organization produces and uses data and information to demonstrate your
development effectiveness (Du, Leten & Vanhaverbeke, 2014). In constructing this overview
you might find that the data and information collected is too ‘micro-level' to enable the
judgment on development effectiveness. Conversely, you might find that the organization
generates a considerable amount of information but that a fairly small amount of information
generated actually informs learning or program development.
What sub-themes should our framework focus on?
This next step in the process is about beginning to put together the content of the framework.
This involves determining the focus and sub-themes for your effectiveness framework. Sub-
themes should reflect areas that are particularly important to your organization, for example,
partnerships with other actors, accountability to primary stakeholders, or gender equality
(Smith, 2014). Factors such as the sequencing of this work alongside your strategic planning
cycle, the scope of existing monitoring and evaluation processes or internal capacity and
understanding around development effectiveness, may also determine the focus of your
framework. In terms of overall focus, your framework can address organizational
effectiveness, which means that the content of the framework would be about organizational
systems, processes, and capacity (Shaharudin, Govindan, Zailani & Tan, 2015).
Alternatively, it can emphasize program effectiveness and focus in on the program activities
you run. In terms of sub-themes, the framework also needs to address what you perceive as
priorities for data collection – the data and information which is vital to provide evidence of
your effectiveness.
What else should our framework include?
Once you have agreed on the focus of your framework, you are ready to finalize an outline
for the actual document. If you have written notes for each step in the process so far, you
should have a tentative outline for a development effectiveness framework. The next step is
to share these initial ideas with at least a few other stakeholders. Example of development
effectiveness framework outlines (organizational level):
• Approach to and definition of development effectiveness

VaesManaging Product and Service Innovation
• How the framework was designed and how it will be reviewed
• How the organization measures effectiveness at an organizational level (including
data and information on activity as well as outcome-level change)
• Key monitoring and evaluation processes that support the framework (including head
office as well as partner or field office level processes)
• Priorities for data collection and analysis (can be linked to organizational strategy)
• Mechanisms for learning from effectiveness reporting and analysis
• Key priorities for implementation
• Resourcing and calendar of effectiveness reporting outputs and activities
• (Will align with organizational planning cycle).
Development of a plan
An effectiveness framework is likely to be developed and implemented over a period of time.
There is no need to wait till the framework is perfect before you start to use it. In fact, the
framework is best treated as a living document that will be amended over time, in line with
changing priorities and approaches. A culture of learning, which encourages sharing,
feedback, and reflection, will enable the organization to learn, adapt and continuously
improve the quality of what they do. How? In addition to drafting a roll-out and
implementation plan as part of the effectiveness framework document, it is important to have
a discussion on these issues with frontline staff responsible for data collection and analysis. It
may also be essential to have a head-office level discussion on the learning processes which
need to be built or strengthened as a tool for strengthening development effectiveness
(Norman & Verganti, 2014). One way to do this is to pilot the framework with one project or
program before the framework is finalized.
Further suggestions for implementation and roll-out:
• Identify key monitoring and evaluation outputs, particularly in year 1 of
implementation
• Aim for a good balance in terms of quantitative and qualitative outputs
• Review the frequency of all monitoring, evaluation and learning processes and
outputs is it doable?
• Monitoring reports are on-going; impact studies should only be done after several
years of operation

VaesManaging Product and Service Innovation
• Take time out of the day-to-day implementation of activities to reflect on issues of
effectiveness.
Implement
The subsequent stage is the usage of the activity design. This a period in which individuals
will learn by doing, by disclosure, by being stood up to with issues, their circumstances and
end results. In the event that things go well, if staff individuals are persuaded and are engaged
with the basic leadership, they will begin feeling in charge of what they are doing, which will
make 'proprietorship'. The sentiment possession is basic if staff individuals are to feel
committed and trust in what they are doing.
Monitoring
The procedure of progress needs nonstop observing and screening and needs to be checked
on the off chance that you are on the correct street or in the event that you have gone astray.
In the event that the outcomes are not what you expected, things may go gradually,
individuals lose inspiration and move must be made. A change procedure resembles a kid
figuring out how to walk: falling and getting up once more. Try not to get debilitated,
appreciate the positive results and adjust your procedures to the negative ones. Checking is a
nonstop procedure for the term of the undertaking. It is a movement in view of information
gathering. The information and abilities required for checking are the same with respect to
evaluation and examination. Checking is fundamental in an evolving circumstance
(Natalicchio, Ardito, Savino and Albino, 2017). The reason for observing is to see if the
program and exercises are occurring on time, are powerful, and whether methodologies
should be adjusted to guarantee the most ideal outcomes. Set up an agenda – what would you
like to tally or measure? Take a gander at the 'coveted changes', the pointers and the course of
events in your activity design. Backpedal and read about markers. A few undertakings are
less demanding to screen than others. In the event that you are inoculating youngsters, you
tally the children and ascertain the extent of all kids secured and not secured. Changes in
states of mind or conduct are more hard to screen, however the utilization of good markers
from the earliest starting point will encourage this procedure.
Assess
Assessment is a movement in itself. It is frequently the last piece of an undertaking or process
yet in the meantime the start of the following stage, expansion or new proposition. The act of

VaesManaging Product and Service Innovation
assessing one's own exertion is a characteristic one: ladies will hope to check whether spots
have been expelled from shirts subsequent to washing, a repairman will check if the engine
he repaired is working legitimately, a craftsman will run his hands over the wood to choose
when a piece is smooth. If not, they may need to change their approach, apparatus or means.
A staff of the association can complete an inward assessment. Or on the other hand an
autonomous outside organization can play out an outer assessment, frequently at the demand
of the contributor. The entire gathering of staff worried about a particular venture could talk
about and concur on markers that would demonstrate that subsequent to preparing the task is
more open, worthy, compelling or whatever. These eventual markers used to assess. The
reason for the assessment is to survey the genuine aftereffects of an action.
A NGO could get some information about:
Adequacy: To what degree have the destinations been accomplished? Also, at what cost? On
the off chance that destinations were not met, what are the causes behind this? Methodologies
and activity utilized: Which were the qualities of the procedures/activities? What's more,
which were the powerless focuses?
Goals: Are targets still substantial or do these should be adjusted? Which changes should be
made with a specific end goal to achieve the destinations?
Proficiency: Are the expenses in extent to the advantages? These costs allude to assets: HR,
time, vitality, cash, and materials.
Effect: What has been the effect on the staff, the association and the partners? What changes
have been realized by the undertaking? These progressions can be the ones that were
arranged, yet in addition sudden ones.
Conclusion
Based on the above-displayed report it has been derived that overall issues Save the Children
and the more extensive universal group have expanded ability to execute vast scale, viable
tyke insurance programs previously, amid and after crises. Kids related with military or
outfitted gatherings Children advantage from enhanced, quality projects that counteract
enrolment into military or gatherings and additionally bolster discharge and reintegration into
families and groups. Family detachment isolated and unaccompanied youngsters are given
sufficient care and family following and reunification administrations, and kids in danger of
partition get preventive help administrations..

VaesManaging Product and Service Innovation

VaesManaging Product and Service Innovation
References
Andrews, C. R., Cannon, H. M., Cannon, J. N., & Low, J. T. (2014). Beyond the Profitable-
Product Death Spiral: Managing Product Mix in an Environment of Constrained
Resources. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 36.
Biemans, W. (2018). Managing innovation within networks. Routledge.
Browning, T. R., & Yassine, A. A. (2016). Managing a portfolio of product development
projects under resource constraints. Decision Sciences, 47(2), 333-372.
Cui, A. S., & Wu, F. (2016). Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and
impact of customer involvement on new product performance. Journal of the
academy of marketing science, 44(4), 516-538.
De Matta, R., Lowe, T. J., & Wu, L. (2015). Managing product variety in a supply chain.
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 62(1), 4-17.
Du, J., Leten, B., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2014). Managing open innovation projects with
science-based and market-based partners. Research Policy, 43(5), 828-840.
Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., & Storbacka, K. (2015). Managing co‐creation design: A
strategic approach to innovation. British Journal of Management, 26(3), 463-483.
Kahn, K. B. (2014). Product planning essentials. Routledge.
Kindström, D., & Kowalkowski, C. (2014). Service innovation in product-centric firms: A
multidimensional business model perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial
Marketing, 29(2), 96-111.
Koen, P. A., Bertels, H. M., & Kleinschmidt, E. (2014). Managing the front end of innovation
—Part I: Results from a three-year study. Research-Technology Management, 57(2),
34-43.
Laine, T., Korhonen, T., & Martinsuo, M. (2016). Managing program impacts in new product
development: An exploratory case study on overcoming uncertainties. International
Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 717-733.
Ma, L., Artho, C., & Sato, H. (2014). Managing Product Variants by Project Centralization.
Lecture Notes on Software Engineering, 2(2), 195-200.
Matsas, M., Pintzos, G., Kapnia, A., & Mourtzis, D. (2017). An integrated collaborative
platform for managing product-service across their life cycle. Procedia CIRP, 59,
220-226.

VaesManaging Product and Service Innovation
Natalicchio, A., Ardito, L., Savino, T., & Albino, V. (2017). Managing knowledge assets for
open innovation: a systematic literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management,
21(6), 1362-1383.
Norman, D. A., & Verganti, R. (2014). Incremental and radical innovation: Design research
vs. technology and meaning change. Design issues, 30(1), 78-96.
Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2014). Designing and enabling spaces for collaborative
knowledge creation and innovation: From managing to enabling innovation as socio-
epistemological technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 346-359.
Schüler, K., Trogus, R., Feilkas, M., & Kinnen, T. (2015). Managing product quality in
complex software development projects. In Proceedings of the Embedded World
Conference.
Seidel, V. P., & O’Mahony, S. (2014). Managing the repertoire: Stories, metaphors,
prototypes, and concept coherence in product innovation. Organization Science,
25(3), 691-712.
Shaharudin, M. R., Govindan, K., Zailani, S., & Tan, K. C. (2015). Managing product returns
to achieve supply chain sustainability: an exploratory study and research propositions.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 1-15.
Sjoerdsma, M., & van Weele, A. J. (2015). Managing supplier relationships in a new product
development context. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(3), 192-
203.
Smith, W. K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing
strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592-1623.
Subrahmanian, E., Lee, C., & Granger, H. (2015). Managing and supporting product life
cycle through engineering change management for a complex product. Research in
Engineering Design, 26(3), 189-217.
Vaes, K. (2014). Product stigmaticity: understanding, measuring and managing product-
related stigma. Universiteit Antwerpen (Belgium).
Wattegama, E. J., & Ping, Q. (2015). An Entrepreneur’s Personal Value Perspective in
Managing Product Harm Crises. International Journal Of Management, Accounting
& Economics, 2 (7), 749, 765.