PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
2
process and ethical activities of the Acronym Company it is observed that the organization has
become one of the political strategy planner as the Shadow has collaborated with the company
(McNamara et al., 2018). Followed by the consideration as it is observed that Acronym has
always intended to separate them from the politics but Shadow being one of the company that is
collaborated with politics the policies of the company has been violated. Makin allowances to
this concern it is observed that both of these aspects are highly unethical as according to the
theories of professional responsibilities introducing an incomplete application is not all of
bearable as this may cause a huge blunder to its stakeholders. While analyzing these concern it is
also observed that after the downfall of the application of Shadow, Acronym has immediately
tried to separate themselves from the collaboration of Shadow which is one of the biggest
conflict raised by the Acronym (Gotterbarn et al., 2017).
Thus, it can be summarizes that Shadow has significantly violates the ethical policies as
well as the working procedure of Iowa Democratic Party. Along with this it is also identified that
violation of the organizational policy of Acronym is also one of the major ethical concern
according to the ACM codes of conduct (Wolf 2016). Whereas, the intention of Acronym has
also been considered as one of the major conflicts present in the nominated case scenario.
Question 2: Assume that you were an employee of Shadow. You know the
facts presented in the article. Its two weeks before the Iowa caucuses. Should
you report your concerns? To whom? In what order? Apply an ethical theory,
and apply De George’s criteria to your actions.
Answer:
Followed by the analysis of the nominated case scenario it has been identified that I were
an employ of the nominated organization Shadow I would have reacted in a different way. Based

+13062052269

info@desklib.com

Report || Professional Ethics

Contribute Materials