Professional Issues AssignmentIntroduction 1.Introduction The two case studies are discussing in this assignment. Rachel, who is thequalityengineer,worksatoneelectronicsorganization,andher responsibility is to check the company's products before the market launch. In the meantime, her organization tied with another authority who makes the chips. Which are integrated into the servers Rachel's business makes. The business prototype for this product is to launch a new generation server roughlyeverysixmonths,denotingRachelhasapartialtimeframeto complete her job. She will not dispatch a product if there is an option that the server could breakdown and occur physical damage to the client. Conversely, she will ship a good that has an advanced probability of failure resulting in data damage for the client. On the other case study are related to the copyright concerns. William is working on the SDAX alliance for the software engineer. He is constructing code for this organization todevelop a hard disc controller. William are previouslygeneratethiscodefortheirpreviousorganization.Hereuses without any official confirmation. The official administration is excited with the speed developments; this code carries to the product. When the product is reviewed by the quality team, they discover this code is reused by one company. In the interrogation time, the authority determines that Williams is now aware of the copyright issues. Suppose SDX alliance have not used this code, so they are suffering from business loss effectively. In this assignment are discussing different behaviours of two case studies. 2.Analysis 2.1Legal factors Legal factorsare outsidefactorswhich mention to how theruleaffects thetechniquebusinessesfunctionandclientsbehave.Productshipping, income margins, and feasibility of definite markets are all instances of things which may be subjective byhereditary factors. 2.1.1.Scenario 1.1 Consumer law:- Thequality analystsRachelwhoarevery muchefficientfor their responsibility. But their organizations are creating an agreement with another company who are produce chips for the servers. Rachel assumes that when another organization are making chips, so the product review time frame should be decreased (Al Mamun & Hasan, 2017). If her team does not review the product, then their goods are suffering from mechanical damage. This (Student Name, Course, Semester, Year)0Page2
Professional Issues AssignmentIntroduction situation is covered by consumer law. The customer believes that the product is properly and checked by the authority, but the fact can be the opposite. 2.1.2.Scenario 1.2 Copyright Law:- William is using one code which is used for another organization. But the William is not familiar to the copyright laws. These law state that itisan intellectual possessions right that defends the maker or proprietor of original sensitive works (Tickle, Mann & Adebanjo, 2017). The material should be abridged to a tangible form. A copyright gives the proprietor the selective right to replicate it, do derivative works from it, complete the effort and show the initiative. If the authority is launching the product without any permission of William's previous company, then they should come under the copyright law. 2.2Professional factors Occupationalfactorsareverymuchcrucialforthebusiness.The occupational factors depend on specific categories such as communication, trust, mutual respect and others. The appropriate Professional relationship creates any business more significant. 2.2.1Scenario 1.1 Mindfulness:- Rachel'sactivitiesaredecliningsomeprofessionalfactors.Not everybodyhasasimilarcharacterorchoice-makingstyle.Whenthis instigates to happen in the workplace, struggles can occur, sentiments can be drawn, and pressure is easily shaped (Cuervo-Cazurra, 2016). If Rachel communicates with their organization authority, then the administration can resolve this problem. Rachel's cannot communicate with their power for this problem. The professional factors state that if anyone does not approach to their head, then the head cannot determine the difficulties. Duty of disclosure:- As earlier conversed, Rachel had some childish opinions which she lawfully did not have to report.Conversely, as Rachel was working in a QA role, so her primary responsibility is to launch the technically appropriate product. If she is not able to take proper analysis, then the product server couldfaultandcausephysicaldamagetotheclient.Itisverymuch dangerous for the authority’s ethics. 2.2.2Scenario 1.2 Mutual Respect:- SDX alliance are trying to launch the disc controller. As a software engineer, William constructs one code, but another organization already uses (Student Name, Course, Semester, Year)0Page3
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Professional Issues AssignmentIntroduction thiscode.IftheSDXalliancearebeginningthesecodewithoutthese organization's permission, so they are loose mutual respect criteria. Mutual respect cannot distinguish between the small company and big company. Everyorganizationshouldrespectanother,andthismaintainsproper professional factors (Kurin, 2016). SDX Alliance is a big organization, but they cannot contempt this start-up authority who invents this code. Fairness:- William is reuse there code without taking any official permission. At first, authority is very much excited about this improvement. But the William knows he does not fare for his responsibilities. Any professional relationships are construction at the basis of fairness, but in these cases, these rules are not fulfilled properly. 2.3Employment and Social factors Thesocialaspect concentrates on the powers within the society. These factorscan distress people attitudes, sentiments and benefits. So, it can affect deals of product and incomes earned. 2.3.1Scenario 1.1 Values:- Rachel’s department has a standard practice of charging imperfectly. She always thought that she could not complete her analysis within the proper period, which specifies that the quality assurance section does not have moral practices in place and that their ethics are doubtful and improper. Scapegoats:- A scapegoat is an individual or individuals that is blamed for the misconduct of others, which is unethical and disreputable behaviour (Buh Kovačič & Indihar Štemberger, 2015).The organizations can deal with other authority, but Rachel believes that for this reason, her team are unable to proceed proper review process within a time frame. 2.3.2Scenario 1.2 Mentality: - William's attitude is not proper for this scenario. It is correct that he constructs a code for one Start-up Company. But he cannot reuses this for another company. William also not takes any permission for their authority. In thissituationstatethatWilliamissufferingfromawrongattitudeand unprofessional mentality. 2.4Personal factors The personal factors mainly depend on the individual opinions of the employee. But these opinions should not hamper the organization’s ethics. (Student Name, Course, Semester, Year)0Page4
Professional Issues AssignmentIntroduction 2.4.1Scenario 1.1 Rachel will not distribute a product if there is any probability that the server could breakdown and occur physical damage to the client (Chen et al., 2014). Conversely, Rachel will distribute a product that has a sophisticated possibility of failure subsequent in data damage for the customer. Because she identifies that if she doesn't, her corporation's opponent will make this task effectively. 2.4.2Scenario 1.2 William also believes that if he reuses this code, then their work effort must reduce. So he reuses this code but unable to aware of the copyright issues which can be created to delay the product launch. 2.5Intrinsic factors 2.5.1Scenario 1.1 Workingsatisfactionisessentialforanybusinessprofit.Suppose Rachel and her team review their product within a short time, then she believes that this product inevitably creates some physical damage for their client. 2.5.2Scenario 1.2 When the manager questioned William of the code reuse problem, Williamconfessesheisunawareofthecopyrightlaws(Saleem,2017). William then goes on to clarify that the start-up he applied to work for is currently out of business and is unsure if this organization would be able to find in contact with the start-up company. Suppose SDX Alliance can’t use William’s code, then they suffering from product launching delay. 2.6Prioritisation 2.6.1Scenario 1.1 FactorRelated Issue 1LegalThecustomerbelieves thattheproductis properly and checked by theauthority. Unfortunately, this product can occur there physical damage. (Student Name, Course, Semester, Year)0Page5
Professional Issues AssignmentIntroduction 2ProfessionalIfRachelislinkedwith theirorganization authority,thenthe management can resolve thisdifficulty.Rachel's cannotinterconnectwith theirpowerforthis problem. 3ProfessionalRachelhasnotfulfilled her responsibility because sheassumesherworks are not complete within a short period 4Employment and Social FactorHerscapegoats' behaviourmustbe affectedtheir organization's profit 5PersonalThis organization provides anincendiarydevice whichmustaffectthe customer. 6IntrinsicRachelisnotsatisfied with her product Table 1: Priority List Scenario 1 2.1.1.Scenario 1.2 FactorRelated Issue 1LegalWilliamcannotfulfilthe business copyright law 2LegalWilliamcodereuse processiscoveragainst the ethical requirements in business 3ProfessionalWilliamsactivitiesare sufferingfromalackof fairness 4ProfessionalAt the initial time, William isnotprovidedwithany mutualrespectforthe organization so he cannot takeanypermission before this work. 5SocialWilliamissufferingfrom (Student Name, Course, Semester, Year)0Page6
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Professional Issues AssignmentIntroduction unprincipledattitudeand dishonourable mentality. 6PersonalWilliam is unable to know copyrightissuesohe believesthatreusecode can reduce his work effort 7IntrinsicWilliamwantstoproduct successandgoodwork. Thatisthereasonhe reuses the code. Table 2: Priority List Scenario 2 2.7Decision The verdict should be arranged around the critical factors that create an outcome in the public interest. As hereditary considerations continuously take importance over everything, they must correct them first where probable, and consider other factors in order of position. 2.7.1Scenario 1.1 Rachel and The business authority should take proper decisions to mitigate all issues (Ahmed, Sharif & Ahmad, 2017). Initially, Rachel can approachtherebusinessauthoritytoincreasethetimespan.Ifproper communication is happening, then this problem must be solved. But the qualityteamcannotpermitanydefectiveproductwhichmaybecome dangerousforthebusiness.Inthepreliminaryphase,Rachelandher business authority should develop some innovative conceptions that can fulfil for the client requirement. After mitigating the legal issues, Rachel must fulfil all business factors that are developed for this scenario. 2.7.2Scenario 1.2 SDX alliance and William these case are complicated. At first, as a professional actor, William must know about every ethical business laws. When he can tell this reuse techniques to their higher management, then the authority can warn this. In these points suppose the power can re-write their code then they are suffering from significant losses. Suppose they launched this product then administration is suffering from the copyright issues (Gilani, ur Rehman & Mujtaba, 2014). At first, they should contact these start-up organization who are creating this in first and hence SDX can transfer this copyrightwiththeirname.Iftwoorganizationsaremakinggoodmutual understanding, then they can solve this problem. (Student Name, Course, Semester, Year)0Page7
Professional Issues AssignmentIntroduction 3Discussion 3.1.1Scenario 1.1 Rachel’s organization are producing on the electronics equipment and shipping in the market. Rachel is the quality head and responsible for all product testing before the market release. In this time, another chip-making company are dealing with these electronics organizations. But the problem is that at this moment Rachel, not enough time to review this product. So the product should be defective and create physical damage for the customer. Rachel and the organization's authority should discuss this problem, and she can approach to raise the product review timing for business benefit. 3.1.2Scenario 1.2 SDX alliance hired William as a software. His first project was to backing in in scripting the code for disc controller. William had previously worked on the same system interning at a small organization and had transcribed a code which importantly improved the product performance (Yeoh & Popovič, 2016). So, he quietly re-uses this similar code in this project without taking any permission. The manager is happy with this product development. William confessedthattheyarenotfamiliartothecopyrightissues.Ifthese organizations are not launching this product, then these are creating a terrible loss for them. On the other hand, suppose they are starting it, so these also againstcopyrightlaws.Iftwoorganizationaremakingmutualand professional understanding, then this problem can be resolved. 3.Conclusion In this report are describing two different case studies which are suffering from specific ethical laws and business factors. In this report are correctly describing all possible business factors. 3.1.3Scenario 1.1 In the first scenario named to ship or not to ship are determine some specific business conduct. Rachel and The business authority should take appropriate decisions to diminish all issues. Initially, Rachel can approach there business authority to increase the timespan. If proper communication is happening, then these difficulties must be solved. But the Rachel’s team cannot permit any defective product which may become dangerous for the business. In the preliminary phase, Rachel and her business expert should develop some advanced conceptions that can fulfil for the client requirement. (Student Name, Course, Semester, Year)0Page8
Professional Issues AssignmentIntroduction After justifying the legal issues, Rachel must fulfil all economic factors that are grown for this situation. 3.1.4Scenario 1.2 The second case study which named that copyright laws are describing Williamcriminalactivity.SDXallianceandWilliamthesecaseare complicated. At first, as a professional actor, William must know about every ethical business laws. When William can express this reuse techniques to their upper management, then the authority can warn this. In these points suppose the power can re-writetheir code then they are sufferingfrom significant losses. Suppose they launched this product then power is suffering fromthecopyrightissues.Atfirst,theyshouldcontactthesestart-up organization who are creating this in first and hence the organization can transfer this patent with their name. If two administrations are making good mutual understanding, then they can solve this problem. (Student Name, Course, Semester, Year)0Page9
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Professional Issues AssignmentIntroduction 4.References:- Ahmed, K. A., Sharif, N., & Ahmad, N. (2017). Factors influencing students’ career choices: empirical evidence from business students.Journal of Southeast Asian Research,2017, 1-15. Al Mamun, C. A., & Hasan, M. N. (2017). Factors affecting employee turnover and sound retention strategies in business organization: a conceptual view.Problems and Perspectives in Management, (15, Iss. 1), 63-71. Buh, B., Kovačič, A., & Indihar Štemberger, M. (2015). Critical success factors for different stages of business process management adoption–a case study.Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja,28(1), 243-257. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Jin, J., Wang, L., & Chow, W. S. (2014). IT capabilityandorganizationalperformance:therolesofbusiness processagilityandenvironmentalfactors.EuropeanJournalof Information Systems,23(3), 326-342. Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2016). Corruption in international business.Journal of World Business,51(1), 35-49. Gilani, S. R. S., ur Rehman, H., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2014). Islam, Shari'a Laws and International Human Rights Compatibility for Expatriate Business Managers.Journal of Business Studies Quarterly,6(2), 98. Kurin, J. (2016). A Third Way for Applying US Labor Laws to the Online Gig Economy:UsingtheFranchiseBusinessModeltoRegulateGig Workers.J. Bus. & Tech. L.,12, 193. Saleem,M.A.(2017).Theimpactofsocio-economicfactorsonsmall business success.Geografia-Malaysian Journal of society and space, 8(1). Tickle, M., Mann, R., & Adebanjo, D. (2016). Deploying business excellence– success factors for high performance.International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Yeoh,W.,& Popovič,A.(2016). Extendingtheunderstandingof critical successfactorsforimplementingbusinessintelligencesystems. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(1), 134-147. (Student Name, Course, Semester, Year)0Page10