Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Professional Issues Ethics and Computer Law1 Professional Issues Ethics and Computer Law Student name Course Title Professor’s Name University City and State Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Professional Issues Ethics and Computer Law2 Impact on ‘democracy’ of the Extraordinary Changes in Information Technology Today Introduction The recent rise in the digital technology has stirred a number of profound political effects. Consequently, any philosophy of democracy and the Internet has to be tempered with by the long rich past interplay that exists between government regimes and communication technology. Consequently, in spite of the prevalence of electronic democracy in all areas of information, social life, economic, political, communication technologies as well as its implications expounding most governments as well as Australia continue to be ignored by political science. Yet the probable impact of modern information, communication technology is overwhelmingly modifying social, political in addition to economic relations in a great way (Sandoval-Almazan, & Gil-Garcia, 2014, p. 367). Indeed both the Internet as well as the social media in a more general way are playing a significant part in making strides to shape the political process. Accordingly, some of these forms of information technology come with a great range of effects on the manner in which democracy functions including the Australian democracy. Electronic democracy has resulted in the extraordinary modifications that are currently being faced by individuals’ lives, with some of these changes being how digital technology affects political mobilization and campaigns, communitarian democracy, the change in ways in which science is taught, done and disseminated, and the ethical issues related to information and democracy. Digital technology which consists of big data, the Internet as well as social media have taken an essential part in the United States elections beginning from the time of President Barack Obama’s campaigns in 2008 (Sandoval-Almazan, & Gil-Garcia, 2014, p. 365). As a result of these form of electronic democracy, it has revolutionized the manner in
Professional Issues Ethics and Computer Law3 which political actors’ mobile support in addition to the manner in which citizens take part in politics. Nonetheless, most of the European parties have not been on the front as early adaptors of electronic democracy, but they have begun making appreciations towards it. There rising of novel forms of participation and mobilization are the core subject matters in the political science study because it is directly significant for political courses in the current society. For instance, a clear example of a recent impact of democracy of information technology is the campaign that was launched against the SVP’s “Durchsetzungsinitiative.” The campaign was unanimously and greatly depend on social media. Another tangible example is the new platformwecollect.chthat was started by the Swiss left-wing groups to enable the collection of signatures for the famous initiatives as well as referenda. Subsequently, in this perspective of intensified electoral competition and declining signature requirements, this type of invention is purportedly likely to further skyrocket the strategic use of direct democracy as an electoral strategySandoval-Almazan, & Gil-Garcia (2014), which not only contributes to the “disenchantement” of Swiss democracy but also the globe as a whole. Thus, the rise in the social equity in terms of the Internet and social media has led to several changes in the political arena. Positive Impacts of Information Technology on Democracy Digital technology has become game changer instrument of governments. In the recent past, governments have increasingly started to depend upon big data for their decision- making processes. Additionally, the “Open Data” association asserts that administrations are supposed to make data public and should make it freely accessible as a way to enhance innovation, transparency without forgetting efficiency. Therefore, a huge number of government have embraced this line. Similarly, digital technology is bringing changes in the manner in which individuals form attitudes and involve in political matters. On the same note, authorities are heavily dependent on information technology so that to be able to
Professional Issues Ethics and Computer Law4 improve their surveillance capabilities. For instance, the referendum against Switzerland's Nachrichtendierstgesetzas well as the multinational outrage against the United States’ National Security Agency activities reveals a major controversy in these practices. Communitarian Democracy The core elements of communitarian democracy include the common good and citizenship. The primary target of democracy is to reorient individuals’ lives, by expounding their interests through debate and how they discourse with other people. Also, another target of democracy is to enrich the self through the experience of citizenship. Therefore, democracy is not a procedure to allow the majority to govern the interests of the minority antagonistically, but is a process of persuasion with the aim of creating as well as maintaining a common good in life. In this case, information communication technology is playing a significant role in enhancing communitarianism. There have been significant reforms in the voting and opinion giving which has been made possible through the use of ICT, thus it fulfils one part of the communitarian objective which is criticism like plebiscitary models all the same (Sandoval-Almazan, & Gil-Garcia, 2014, p. 367). ICTs also acts as a means through which people can get informed and educated. Similarly, information technology offers a novel means through which persons are able to converge in communities, where, perhaps due to geographical barriers or distance they could not have made it before. Furthermore, the extensive ranging trails with electronic metropolitan conferences that are happening in different parts of the world is perhaps a conspicuous example of ICT as well as the communitarian objective. For instance through the power of information technology, things like connected computers, cables TV, as well as telephones are able to operate as applications that support two-way argument and discussion of matters before an opinion poll.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Professional Issues Ethics and Computer Law5 Digital technology has extensively influenced information and democracy. Actually, this is one of the rarely recognised and analysed unlike assumptions regarding models of democracy are those linked with democracy and information. The most direct one is based on the commonly held opinion (and this can be taken aback to the time of the Greeks as well as the celebrated through Francis Bacon words) which states that information is equal to knowledge and which is equivalent to power. With regard to the above statement, telematics that is the convergence of information-processing as well as communication technologies; which are important to electronic democracy (Turkle, 2017, p. 6). Subsequently, ICTs with its expansive capacity to gather, keep the process and disseminate information acts as instruments for unlocking access to information and thus enhancing power and knowledge. With the appreciation of this direct opinion of the importance and responsibility of information, it has made it possible for numerous exponents of electronic democracy. Certainly, this view about information, communication and technology have been a major contributor and enhancer to the distribution and channelling of information across the society which is inherently democratic. Digital technology is revolutionizing the manner in which social science is taught, done as well as disseminated. The digital insurgency is modelling the social sciences in a range of forms such as the type of tools that are used by people, the way in which researchers work in collaboration to understand how digital technology has integrated itself in social science and how technology is applied to communicate past academia. Therefore, information technology has been and continue to be a game changer of the social science toolkit such as how social research practices are conducted as well as how theorists communicate to the masses. For instances, digital technology has impelled a move from personal work to massive scale, coordinated and intensely interdisciplinary projects that in most cases is pursued problem-solving aspects. As such, cases call for new kinds of structure
Professional Issues Ethics and Computer Law6 that are past the traditional division arranged alongside disciplinary lines (Servaes, and Hoyng, 2017, p. 257). At the same though information technology it has triggered efforts to improve transparency of social science studies by supporting norms of data sharing as well as replication. In addition, digital technology and particularly social media are changing how social scientists distribute their thoughts past academia (Turkle, 2017, p. 6). Social media has countered the traditional intermediaries between philosophers and the masses, which has resulted in novel probabilities of discussing as well as the exchange of information. Thus, this initiative has made is easier to quantify public outreach such that scholars are now able to carry out their personal practices, but their influence has significantly helped to improve blogs like the new SNF-funded platformDeFactoandThe Monkey Cageblog. Negative Impacts of Information Technology on Democracy Information technology threatens the existence and survival of dictatorial governments. The Internet control insurgency is critical for dictatorship administrations. Information technology enables a collective action and it has shown to be a tool in the diffusion of scenarios at the time of the Arab Spring (Turkle, 2017, p. 6). Social media has proved to be a powerful awareness enhancement tool of electoral fraud (Turkle, 2017, p. 4). Consequently, it is not surprising that dictatorial governments have been consistently manipulating the access to the Internet when a time comes where they are compelled to walk a fine line between openness and suppression. Ethical Issues in Information Technology and Democracy Digital technology and specifically information technology have its ethical implication on democracy and its accountability. The perspective of the studies shows that democracy can be taken as an institutionalised kind of responsibility. There it is indeed true that the usage of information technology has something to teach the public concerning the
Professional Issues Ethics and Computer Law7 ethical impacts of electronic democracy (Servaes, and Hoyng, 2017, p. 255). Accordingly, democracy is a form of administration that deals with the distribution of power. As a result, a majority of the ethical philosophies concur with the fact that power since it impacts each person’s life and the society at large, it is ethically relevant. Thus, the manner in which this power is carried out in democracies is significant in the sense of the ethical theory of democracy. As it has been initially highlighted that in democracies, the citizen is regarded as the source of power as well as sovereignty. Certainly, democracy is the solution to the outdated query of how individuals should interact in the generation of normative fabric and particularly in the production of its laws. Free interaction in a democratic society results in a free discussion of subject matters, reasons and information (Sandoval-Almazan, & Gil- Garcia, 2014, p. 371). In the current world, democracy is used as the extensively known form of legitimate administration because it is based on moral ideas like equality and human dignity. The underlying view of people is modelled as an eye opener of mankind views as well as its explicit objective to enable the enhancement of their social state. While there exist a range of parallels between democracy and responsibility all of them inherently rely on communication. Consequently, it is concluded that democracy is a form of institutionalised form of accountability. As a result, information technology understood as the totality of technological artefacts as well as procedure employed to exchange and distribute information obviously has an impact on responsibility and democracy (Sandoval-Almazan, & Gil-Garcia, 2014, p. 375). Particularly, the latest development, the world-wide ease of access to the internet and, social media and the World Wide Web which promises essential changes in the way people communicate. Information technology dissemination of power, rights and capital. In conclusion, information technology on democracy has enabled the spread of both freedom and democracy. As a result of information technology it has enhanced the protection
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Professional Issues Ethics and Computer Law8 of the integrity electoral process of different nations which has led a peaceful coexistence among its citizens. That means that information technology particularly use of social media has played a major role in advancing first communication which is the key revolution to change in the political arena. Nevertheless, information technology also acts a threat to democracy because authoritative regimes are wielding technology particularly social media for their individual ends. Nations have been heard of influencing electoral results through the use of social media. Therefore, as much as information technology is playing a significant in enhancing democracy, it is also contributing towards the distortion of the same democracy.
Professional Issues Ethics and Computer Law9 Bibliography Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R., 2014. Towards cyberactivism 2.0? Understanding the use of social media and other information technologies for political activism and social movements.Government Information Quarterly,31(3), 365-378. Servaes, J. and Hoyng, R., 2017. The tools of social change: A critique of techno-centric development and activism.New media & society,19(2), pp.255-271. Turkle, S., 2017. How computers change the way we think. InLaw and Society Approaches to Cyberspace(pp. 3-7). Routledge.