Project Management Assignment : Sorento Quay

Project management

Table of Contents
Assessment Task 1: Assignment......................................................................................................1
1. Case Study...............................................................................................................................1
2. Scope Statement......................................................................................................................1
2. Estimates.................................................................................................................................2
3. Stakeholder
Management Plan.......................................................................................................................6
4. Work breakdown
structure......................................................................................................................................7
5. Communication Plan...............................................................................................................8
6. Risk Analysis..........................................................................................................................9
7. Procurement Plan..................................................................................................................11
8. Gantt Chart............................................................................................................................12
9. Critical Path...........................................................................................................................12
10. Critical Chain......................................................................................................................13
11. Cost baseline
including...................................................................................................................................13
Assessment Task 2: Report............................................................................................................16
REFERNCES ................................................................................................................................20

Assessment Task 1: Assignment
1. Case Study
Sorento Quay is one of famous waterways that is getting polluted day by day because it
does not flow back from and to the Indian ocean. There can be other reasons also for water
pollution such as dumping of solid waste, acid rain, global warming etc. Therefore, there is a
major need to save the water from being polluted and make ways that can further reduce the
possibility of water pollution.
The project requires at a minimum the high-level work activities as follows:
 Lab. setup
 Lab testing
 Obtain and test water (iterative process)
 Conclusion report
 Presentation
 Acceptance by Joondalup City Council
2. Scope Statement
In this project, Small testing environmental project is established that help to clean the
polluted water of Sorento Quay. The project's achievement includes comprehensive scheduling
and implementation over an expanded period of moment (Alexander, 2013). The cooperation of
stakeholders is important to achievement, but a few important stakeholders are listed underneath
in the Stakeholder Management Plan.
Problem statement
The problem is identified by Joondalup City Council as the main cause of the problem of
water pollution is the polluted water of the city is coming to Sorento Quay. The dumping of the
solid waste by the population of the city is raising and water is polluted.
Project goal and objectives :
1

The main purpose behind it to eradicate the problem of the water pollution of the particular area
to neat and clean the environment factor and so the people nearby Sorento Quay can take neat
and clean breathe as well as improve the air quality in the environment.
Project deliverables:
The essential items that are required to be delivered on exact time so that activity related
to cleaning of Sorento Quay could be completed on desired time. Various items such as stability
chambers, pH meters, refractometer, biofuel analysers, balances evaporators, temperature
chambers and sample prep equipment must be delivered by Laboratory Analysers that is consider
to be the biggest supplier of laboratory equipment in entire Australia.
Project limitation:
This particular project is limited to the implication of the costing system and as per the
method of project management.
Project acceptance criteria:
The Joondalup City Council is required to review the progress of the projects in order to
complete the authenticity of project so that polluted water can be cleaned (Brewer and Dittman,
2018).
2. Estimates
Cost management mainly requires an efficient cost analysis to be undertaken in project's
effective execution (Davis, 2014). Three kinds of projections have been compelled for project in
interest of efficient cost management. The three kinds of methods conducted are analogous
estimates, parametric estimates and estimates from the bottom up. Here the project related to
establish.
Accurate analogous:
Expense Task Description Cost Estimate Whole $’s
Capital Expense Purchase of sample prep
equipment
$ 22000
Capital Expense Development of temperature
chambers.
$ 65900
Capital Expense Purchase of biofuel analysers, $ 59000
2

balances and evaporators
Capital Expense Purchase of stability chambers,
pH meters, and refractometers
$ 47100
Capital Expense Contingency $ 16000
Grand Total $ 210000
3

Parametric:
Dependent Variables Cost Per Total
$1,70,500.0
0
sample prep equipment 1.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00
Splice Kits 25.00 $210.00 $5,250.00
Splice Crew 1550.00 $55.00 $85,250.00
Truck Delivery 55.00 $80.00 $4,400.00
Crane 50T 5.00 $105.00 $525.00
Crane 80T 4.00 $120.00 $480.00
Crane 130T 9.00 $125.00 $1,125.00
Franna Crane 25T 12.00 $140.00 $1,680.00
Civil Works crew 44.00 $50.00 $2,200.00
Electrical Contractor 55.00 $60.00 $3,300.00
Contract Rigger 50.00 $35.00 $1,750.00
Contract Fitter 35.00 $125.00 $4,375.00
Contract Supervisor 10.00 $115.00 $1,150.00
Truck Low Loader 70.00 $110.00 $7,700.00
Waste management crew 25.00 $65.00 $1,625.00
Contract scaffolder 24.00 $70.00 $1,680.00
Fixed Plant (Chamber)
Supervisor 15.00 $100.00 $1,500.00
Fixed Plant (Chamber)
Engineer 17.00 $120.00 $2,040.00
Loader 1.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00
Generator 2.00 $2,200.00 $4,400.00
4

Off-road forklift 3.00 $1,500.00 $4,500.00
Toilet Block 1.00 $970.00 $970.00
Lab Change Out Equipment 2.00 $2,600.00 $5,200.00
Waste Bins 3.00 $2,100.00 $6,300.00
Independent Variables Total $39,500.00
Splice Crew Known Team No Rs.0 $14,200.00
Contract Labour Known Team Yes 0%,5% $0.00
Electrical Crew Known Team No 0%,5% $1,200.00
Crane Hire Known
Team/Contract Yes 0%,5% $0.00
Hire Equipment Known Team No 0%,5% $120.00
Waste Management Known
Team No 0%,5% $50.00
Loader Hire Contract
Reasona
ble
0%,5%,8%,1
5% $2,100.00
Exchange Rate Belt Purchase Good
0%,5%,8%,1
5% $14,000.00
Exchange Rate Splice Kits
Purchase Good
0%,5%,8%,1
5% $210.00
Length of project Average 0,33%,66% $3,640.00
Project Difficulty Average 0,33%,66% $3,980.00
Project Total $2,10,000.00
Bottom-up
estimates
5

6

3. Stakeholder
Management Plan.
In order to improve the likelihood of providing the project to schedule, the project
stakeholder scheme was placed together. Stakeholders are essential to achieving the objective by
negotiating and engaging.
Project Title: Environmental
testing lab
Date Prepared: 01st June
2019
Impact
Assess
ment
Expectations/
Strategy
Name
Positio
n Role Contact Influence
Mark
Henry
Project Team
Leader
High
Interest,
High
Power
Key
Player
Weekly reports
on cost base line,
budget variance,
project plan and
project schedule
Leading
Phone:[phone]
32 Email:
Henmark@bigp
ond.com
George
Johnso
n
Asset Owner
Team Leader Leading
Phone:[phone]
32
Email:Geojhon
@bigpond.com
High
Interest,
High
Power
Key
Player
Meetings on key
milestones
Ricky Area Business Support Phone:[phone] High Keep Report financial
7

wood Adviser(finance). ive
32
Email:R.woodl
@finance.com
Interest,
High
Power
Informe
d
data to finance
group. Assist with
cost management
Jonatha
n Trott
Environmentalist
Analyst
Support
ive Phone:[phone]
32
Email:J.Trott@
engineering.co
m
High
Interest,
High
Power
Key
Player
Management of
environmental
resources. Update
on project
schedule
Kane
Mint
Location
Manager (project
sponsor)
Support
ive Phone:[phone]
32
Email:k.mint@
bauxiteco.com
High
Interest,
High
Power
Key
Player
Report to
corporate, sign
off on
completion.
Email details
8

4. Work breakdown
structure.
Project Task Estimated Start Date Estimated Completion Date Task Owner Actual Start Date Actual Completion Date
Project Feasibility Study 01/06/19 03/06/19 John Doe 01/06/19 02/06/19
Cost Benefit Analysis 02/06/19 04/06/19 Jane and John 02/06/19 03/06/19
Project Definition 06/06/19 08/06/19 Jane Doe 06/06/19 09/06/19
Assign Resources 08/06/19 09/06/19 John Smith 08/06/19 11/06/19
Create Project Plan 09/06/19 16/06/19 Kim Lee 09/06/19 11/06/19
Create Communications Plan 15/06/19 17/06/19 Jane Doe 15/06/19 17/06/19
Project Kick-Off Meeting 19/06/19 19/06/19 Jane Doe 19/06/19 20/06/19
Create Phase 1 Plan and Definition 22/06/19 24/06/19 Jane Doe 22/06/19 25/06/19
Phase 1 Execution Kick-Off 24/06/19 24/06/19 Jane Doe 24/06/19 25/06/19
Communicate Phase 1 Progress 25/06/19 01/07/19 John Doe 01/07/19 03/07/19
Change Control Processes 01/07/19 02/07/19 Jane and John 02/07/19 03/07/19
Close Phase 1 02/07/19 03/07/19 Jane Doe 03/07/19 05/07/19
Create Phase 2 Plan and Definition 01/07/19 03/07/19 Chris Johnson 03/07/19 08/07/19
Phase 2 Execution Kick-Off 06/07/19 06/07/19 Chris Johnson 06/07/19 09/07/19
Communicate Phase 2 Progress 07/07/19 09/07/19 Chris Johnson 07/07/19 09/07/19
Change Control Processes 09/07/19 10/07/19 Chris Johnson 09/07/19 11/07/19
Close Phase 2 13/07/19 14/07/19 Jane Doe 13/07/19 14/07/19
Project Delivery 15/07/19 15/07/19 Production Team 15/07/19 17/07/19
Project Closure Meeting 16/07/19 16/07/19 Jane Doe 16/07/19 19/07/19
Performance Appraisal 16/07/19 18/07/19 Jane Doe 18/07/19 22/07/19
Project Feedback Form 16/07/19 18/07/19 Kim Lee 17/07/19 19/07/19
Project Debrief Report 17/07/19 20/07/19 Jane Doe 20/07/19 23/07/19
5. Communication Plan.
Communication management strategy defines a variety of stakeholders' that requires
meaningful information related to project (Eskerod and Vaagaasar, 2014). This is crucial because
it could be expensive to neglect any stakeholder while implementing a project.
Stakeholder Communications Name
Delivery
method/For
mat Producer
Due
Date/Frequency
Mark Henry
Cost Base Line,
Email
Reports
(Project Team
Leader)
Reports Weekly
every Monday at
00:00.00
Budgets, Variance, report, Meetings Weekly on Friday
9

project
Schedule, Project Plan
George
Johnson Required documents, Safety
report
Email
Reports Mary Grill, Meetings –
Environmental compliance. Mark Trott, Finance,
project schedule,
Brett Fish,
Jodi Engineering,
Myers, Adele Procurement
Howe, Kim
Hui. Weekly
Ricky wood
Cost Base Line, Email
(Project Team
Leader) Wednesday
Budgets, Variance
Meeting –
Major 11:30:00
report, project
Work
Jonathan
Trott
Schedule, Project
Plan Face to Face Monday 14:00
Progress Reports, Email Brett Fish
Cost updates,
Meeting -
Fixed
invoices. Plant Cost Thursday
Kane Mint
Engineering Update Email Project morning
10

Meeting - Engineer
Engineering
6. Risk Analysis.
The project recognized inner and additional risk and evaluated the effect of possibility
using specific metric (Glukhov, Ilin and Levina, 2015). The project manager is able to
communicates all hazards that could be happen probable to have an effect of environment and
overall project.
Probability Impact Metric
11

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
ID Date Risk Event P I
Priori
ty Strategy Owner Progress Status
W
B
S
1
08/09/1
9
Environmenta
l disaster 3 5 15
Accept –
Add
contingenc
y Cost and
build in
slack
before any
disaster
Jonatha
n Trott
Report
Weekly -
Procure
ment to
used
known
suppliers
with
guarante
ed lead Ongoing 5
2 19/06/1
9
Issues within
meeting with
Joondalup
4 4 16 Contingen
cy Cost
must be
Ricky
wood
Report
Weekly –
to
Ongoing 4
12

City Council
planned
for next
planning
determin
e the
interest
of parties
those will
be
responsib
le to run
sample
testing of
polluted
water.
3 24/06/19
Problems
while
collecting
sample as
team member
are not sure
about the
proper
understanding 3 5 15
Accept:
Develop
proper
training
George
Johnson
Regular
training
session so
that water
sample
can be
properly
collected. Ongoing 6
7. Procurement Plan
The procurement scheme will indeed be focused on normal processes for company
procurement. Materials to be obtained are mentioned in the accompanying Project Gantt chart on
the resource panel (Goh and Hall, 2013).
Internal labour will be rented at the prices indicated in the accompanying Gantt chart to
either the project price plan. Environmental supervisor provide a recycling organization for
disconnected belt shipment. Manufacturers are categorized to Lead Time, Price, Quality. Every
resources will be reserved for the cost system of the project.
13

8. Gantt Chart
9. Critical Path
14

10. Critical Chain
11. Cost baseline
including
Week
1
Week
2
Week
3
Week
4
Week
5
Week
6
Week
7
Week
8
Week
9
Week
10
Week
11
Week
12
Week
13 Total
Cumulative costs
14,18
4.80
47,71
2.00
15,93
7.60
9,856
.00
22,46
7.20
5,644
.80
9,632
.00
7,504
.00
4,603
.20
2,592
.80
6,563
.20
10,78
5.60 0.00
Lab Equipments
purchased 0.00 0.00
-
1,120
.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
1,120
.00
15

Payment to
contractors
39,85
5.20 0.00
-
19,92
7.60 0.00
-
19,92
7.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
1,971
.20
-
81,68
1.60
Lab software
purchased 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
672.0
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
672.0
0
Payment of 20 PC
within week's time 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
11,52
4.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
11,52
4.80
5 PC purchased in
week 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
3,292
.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
3,292
.80
2 PC in week 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
1,646
.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
1,646
.40
External consultancy
services
1,064
.00
-
3,404
.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
1,702
.40
-
6,171
.20
Trainers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
5,107
.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
1,075
.20
-
6,182
.40
Technical Writers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
1,083
.60
-
1,083
.60 0.00 0.00
-
403.2
0
-
2,570
.40
Paying work force: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hardware engineer 0.00
-
756.0
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
1,680
.00
-
672.0
0
-
3,108
.00
Lead Hardware
engineer 0.00
-
1,108
.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
985.6
0
-
2,094
.40
Software engineers 0.00
-
3,673
.60 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
7,526
.40
-
2,150
.40
-
7,884
.80
-
3,763
.20 0.00
-
728.0
0
-
5,723
.20
-
2,150
.40
-
33,60
0.00
lead software
developer 0.00
-
862.4
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
1,478
.40 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
985.6
0
-
3,326
.40
16

Volume test
software 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
1,456
.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
1,456
.00
Total Cash outflow
40,91
9.20
-
9,805
.60
-
21,04
7.60 0.00
-
20,59
9.60
-
19,05
1.20
-
5,443
.20
-
9,531
.20
-
12,88
8.40
-
1,083
.60
-
728.0
0
-
7,403
.20
-
9,945
.60
-
1,58,
446.4
0
Cash inflow
95,16
1.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
47,58
0.96 0.00 0.00 0.00
47,58
0.96 0.00
1,90,
323.8
4
Net Cashflow
54,24
2.72
-
9,805
.60
-
21,04
7.60 0.00
-
20,59
9.60
-
19,05
1.20
-
5,443
.20
38,04
9.76
-
12,88
8.40
-
1,083
.60
-
728.0
0
40,17
7.76
-
9,945
.60
31,87
7.44
17

Assessment Task 2: Report
Executive summery:
From this particular project report it is summarised that project management and its
function in the business organisation. This report covers the detail planning of the certain
projects that is developed by the management in project costing system. It covers the particular
case study that is based on the Sorento Quay. The project deliver the technical speciality and
software development to the project costing system. Cost management chiefly definite quantity
an cost-efficient analysis to be interpreted in project's impelling carrying out. Some key
milestone of this report that is compiled on the particular date till
Introduction:
Project management plan is strategy which is described the every stage of the projects. It
may includes the planning, monitoring, analysing, controlling the action-plan of the business
organisation in order to execution the projects plan. This is the particular projects that guide
projects control and planning to complete the task. In this particular reports of projects
management it is covers the projects goal and objectives, particular problem stated by Sorento
Quay firm to improve the quality life of the population. In addition to this report covers
appropriate project costing system to management the projects cost (Pasian, Sankaran and
Boydell, 2012). The projects deliver the certain require document, technical specification and
software development. This projects also concluded the project limitation and acceptance
criteria.
Various types of Project methods.
Agile project management method: This is the value centred process of project
management which ensure the completion stage of the project by dividing it in small processes.
This is the most flexible method to cover the all processing stage to complete the given task. This
can be beneficial for the certain process that the project manager is working for environment
treat milestones. The main objects behind this is to constantly adopting to rapid changes in the
feedback of from the customers. This projects method is suited to the small software projects
which is made up to highly educated team of the projects to instant replication of the process.
PERT method : It is stands for project evaluation review techniques. It is defined as the
certain can be evaluated as per the continuous processes on the review of the projects. This is the
process that is combined with the critical path method. This method is used by those firm which
18

is involved in the processing and manufacturing action-plan. It takes accurate time to complete
the task. It can be included the time factor into account to determine the overall budget process
of the task or projects.
Adaptive project framework : This is the particular method which manage the
complexity of the projects and handle the face of the uncertainty. It talks about new invention of
the of new application to traditional linear method that may suit to process or may be not. The
main difficulty in specifying the requirement at the initial stage of the projects. The reason
behind the failure the projects is to avoid the identification of the traditional projects
management approaches.
The solution to this particular dilemma is to create the need of the adopt to consistently
modification in the stages of the projects.
Extreme programming : This is the main methodology of the project management that is
developed by Kent black. This method devised the task into shorter formate to complete the task
in effective manner. The pivotal objective of this EP method is to improve the quality of the
product to satisfy the client needs (Patanakul, Shenhar and Milosevic, 2012). The standard or
principle is to make projects team to strives the better development process. This methodology is
most eminent as it help in the small software development to success the team effort. As per this
particular method of management process, it involves the certain attributes to the traditional
methods to management of the task and projects. This is the visual approaches to management of
the time, budget scope and sustain of the projects in particular time of period.
Method of the project management:
Agile project management method: This is the value centred process of project
management which ensure the completion stage of the project by dividing it in small processes.
This is the most flexible method to cover the all processing stage to complete the given task.
Water fall method : The methodology of waterfall is easiest way a Project Manager can
critique a project. It's one of continuous project management techniques, during which every
stage of project (development, planning, layout, construction, screening, manufacturing and
maintenance) is finished, like a waterfall, until moving on to next. Each stage of the approach
needs a certain quantity of assignments to be finished and evaluated, which improves the
opportunity of finding and correcting any errors / issues until passing on to next stage and fixing
them on spot (Schwindt and Zimmermann, 2015).
19

Scrum Project Management: The Scrum project-management strategy allows software
development organisations to take priority on most important job and divide it into manageable
pieces. Scrum is all about working and interacting with the individuals doing the job as well as
with the individuals who need job done. It's about providing frequently and reacting to feedback,
improving value of company by making sure clients get what really want.
Contrast Methods:
Waterfall as Agile method: Originally, each technique has been developed to cope with
a particular project that particular demands that required to be considered throughout the entire
life-cycle of the project. In essence, this implies choosing a project methodology to manage a
project based on the project's demands, life-cycle and end objectives. For each stage, Waterfall
places excellent focus on paperwork, making it simple to communicate attitude to customers and
interested parties. In addition, customers can always pertain to documents whenever they require
more comprehensive data (such as price, size, schedule, etc.). While for projects which do not
have a defined end objective, Agile is quite efficient as it is not crucial. The objective can be
transcribed on go as project advances and enforced with minimal effort. Agile utilizes an
adaptive, incremental method rather than a linear, continuous approach. With that kind of
technique, instead of splitting the entire project into phases that require to be finished one by one,
Project man split the entire project into few parts which are independently planned, programmed
and delivered, and afterwards linked together to form end product. Whereas Each stage of
Waterfall technique needs a certain quantity of functions to be finished and evaluated, which
improves the opportunity of finding and correcting any errors problems before passing on to next
stage and fixing them on spot.
Agile vs other traditional methods: Extreme Programming (XP) is indeed an agile
project management framework. It specifies everything and all from how to arrange projects'
tasks as well as develop applications, how to boost the efficiency of planners, and what's best
way to work together on system (Turner, 2017). Extreme programming is an agile structure,
meaning it promotes regular updates, iterative growth as well as high degree of client
engagement. It's comparable to Scrum, it's much more normative and judgemental than just XP.
For the project purpose agile project-management method is most appropriate as it help to give
more specified results. According to the above discussed case study this method have been
selected which is defined below:
20

Agile project management method: This can be beneficial for the certain process that the
project manager is working for environment treat milestones (Korhonen, Laine and Martinsuo,
2014). The main objects behind this is to constantly adopting to rapid changes in the feedback of
from the customers. This projects method is suited to the small software projects which is made
up to highly educated team of the projects to instant replication of the process. These are
different aspects of Agile method as discussed below:
Adaptive project framework: This is the particular method which manage the
complexity of the projects and handle the face of the uncertainty. It talks about new invention of
the of new application to traditional linear method that may suit to process or may be not. The
main difficulty in specifying the requirement at the initial stage of the projects. The reason
behind the failure the projects is to avoid the identification of the traditional projects
management approaches. The solution to this particular dilemma is to create the need of the
adopt to consistently modification in the stages of the projects.
Extreme programming: This is the main methodology of the project management that is
developed by Kent black. This method devised the task into shorter formate to complete the task
in effective manner. The pivotal objective of this EP method is to improve the quality of the
product to satisfy the client needs. The standard or principle is to make projects team to strives
the better development process. This methodology is most eminent as it help in the small
software development to success the team effort. As per this particular method of management
process, it involves the certain attributes to the traditional methods to management of the task
and projects. This is the visual approaches to management of the time, budget scope and sustain
of the projects in particular time of period.
21

REFERNCES
Books and Journals
Alexander, K., 2013. Facilities management: theory and practice. Routledge.
Brewer, J. L. and Dittman, K. C., 2018. Methods of IT project management. Purdue University
Press.
Davis, K., 2014. Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success.
International journal of project management. 32(2). pp.189-201.
Eskerod, P. and Vaagaasar, A. L., 2014. Stakeholder management strategies and practices during
a project course. Project Management Journal. 45(5). pp.71-85.
Glukhov, V. V., Ilin, I. V. and Levina, A. I., 2015. Project management team structure for
internet providing companies. In Internet of Things, Smart Spaces, and Next Generation
Networks and Systems (pp. 543-553). Springer, Cham.
Goh, J. and Hall, N. G., 2013. Total cost control in project management via
satisficing. Management Science. 59(6). pp.1354-1372.
Korhonen, T., Laine, T. and Martinsuo, M., 2014. Management control of project portfolio
uncertainty: A managerial role perspective. Project Management Journal. 45(1). pp.21-
37.
Pasian, B., Sankaran, S. and Boydell, S., 2012. Project management maturity: a critical analysis
of existing and emergent factors. International Journal of Managing Projects in
Business. 5(1). pp.146-157.
Patanakul, P., Shenhar, A. J. and Milosevic, D. Z., 2012. How project strategy is used in project
management: Cases of new product development and software development projects.
Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 29(3). pp.391-414.
Schwindt, C. and Zimmermann, J., 2015. Handbook on project management and scheduling Vol.
1. Handbook on Project Management and Scheduling Vol. 2(2). pp.1-1406.
Turner, J. R., 2017. Contracting for project management. Routledge.
22