This report discusses the challenges and strategies in project management for a bearing manufacturing process. It covers aspects such as schedule, cost, customer satisfaction, quality, and stakeholder involvement.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT By Name Course Instructor Institution Location Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Report to company owner As a part of bearing manufacturing process strips of pre-impregnated materials are bonded to the bore of the bearing bush .This process is performed in a bonding room under strict cleanliness, temperature, humidity condition. To attain the objectives of this project at best and cheapest method, consideration will be given to various factors at various points of the progress of the report. Among the issues that will play a major role throughout the process of the manufacture include schedule, cost as well as customer satisfaction. Attaining the project at the best and cheapest cost goes hand in hand with ensuring that the project is delivered within the initially stipulated timeline. This will go hand in hand with ensuring update of the project schedule at regular intervals and checking on the main milestones to ensure or find out if they are still within the very dates as way originally allocated. Finishing the projects within schedule will cut on costs such as additional labor beyond the estimated initial labor. The quality of the project output may be checked periodically as well as at the end of project to ensure the change management process is being adhered to each time as well as the deliverables. The quality review process will be used in ascertaining if the process of manufacturing is meeting the standards as outlined within the quality plans. By ensuring that the initial quality plans are met, the products will be made within the constraints of the anticipated quality and this would ensure reduction or elimination of possible wastages as a result of not manufacturing to expectations. The wider team which are the stakeholders play a fundamental role in getting a great portion of the work done hence there will be need to ensure continuous checking with the stakeholders and establish their feeling regarding the project as it progresses and in case of
anything they feel may be done differently. By ensuring the manufacturing process takes into consideration these issues, the best results are attainable at the most cost effective ways. Report to Lane Manager The project is divided into three phases with each of the phases having distinct task or activity to be conducted. Each of the activities comes along with challenges as far as the design process, costs implications, environmental implications as well as output are concerned. Addressing these challenges constitutes what is anticipated of good management of the entire project and ensures the expectorations are met. As a part of bearing manufacturing process strips of pre-impregnated materials are bonded to the bore of the bearing bush. This process is performed in a bonding room under strict cleanliness, temperature, humidity condition. To attain the objectives of this project at best and cheapest method, consideration will be given to various factors at various points of the progress of the report (Amirsayafi, Jin and Senaratne, 2018). Attaining the project at the best and cheapest cost goes hand in hand with ensuring that the project is delivered within the initially stipulated timeline. This will go hand in hand with ensuring update of the project schedule at regular intervals and checking on the main milestones to ensure or find out if they are still within the very dates as way originally allocated. Finishing the projects within schedule will cut on costs such as additional labor beyond the estimated initial labor. Among the issues that will play a major role throughout the process of the manufacture include schedule, cost as well as customer satisfaction. Breakdown of the time of each of the activities is as given in the Gantt chart below for each of the project phases:
Upgrade 1st bench work station with new build in shelf for brushes and priming pot Upgrade 3rd bench work station with new magnify lamp Upgrade 5th bench with new build in tool box Install a modern tools install a new box order new cardex test and commision new cardex Implement 5s standard Implement new Lean standard of work 10-Oct20-Oct30-Oct9-Nov19-Nov29-Nov9-Dec19-Dec Progress Review 1 Gant Chartt As can be noted from the Gantt chart, a delay in any of the processes in the three phases of the assignment would result into an astatic delay of the entire project (Takey and de Carvalho, 2015). The challenge identified in phase one of the projects revolved around upgrading the benches been with new build in shelves, new presses, new build in tool boxes. The design process came up with a design approach to solve the challenge.The project team produce detail analysis of the material and found the most suitable material which helped the activity to be completed on time. This means that timely delivery of the project went hand in hand with adherence to the various professional codes as well as standard working practice as through such, the requirements of the design would easily be met thereby saving on the time spent (Norrie and Walker, 2004). The quality of the project output may be checked periodically as well as at the end of project to ensure the change management process is being adhered to each time as well as the deliverables. The quality review process will be used in ascertaining if the process of manufacturing is
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
meeting the standards as outlined within the quality plans. By ensuring that the initial quality plans are met, the products will be made within the constraints of the anticipated quality and this would ensure reduction or elimination of possible wastages as a result of not manufacturing to expectations. Professional standards, standard working conditions as well as standard process are ideal in ensuring the quality of the products is attained as anticipated. With regard to professional standards and standard processes reference should be made to the various codes of ethics for engineers that would serve as a proof as to whether the activity being carried out is recommended (Kerzner and Kerzner, 2017). The professional standards are an integral part of the sustainability attainment aspects of the project. While focus should be on ensuring that the required quality is attained of the product, it should not be done at the expense of the environment and sustainability (Nonino et al., 2018). This means that all the activities should be carried out in such a way that guarantees protection of the environment as well as minimal disturbance to the ecosystem. This is more evident in phase one of the project that involves upgrading of the benches. It is recommended that the materials used for the bench and the shelves be derived from the surrounding to ensure that there is no white elephant in the project. The wider team which are the stakeholders play a fundamental role in getting a great portion of the work done hence there will be need to ensure continuous checking with the stakeholders and establish their feeling regarding the project as it progresses and in case of anything they feel may be done differently. By ensuring the manufacturing process takes into consideration these issues, the best results are attainable at the most cost effective ways (Jugdev and Müller, 2005) There are various methods that are adopted in the processes of production of various products. To attain the best and cheapest ways of manufacturing, the industry standards should be adhered
to in terms of sizing among other features (Shenhar and Dvir, 2007). This will ensure that the products do not suffer legal setback on quality that would in turn reduce their competitive marketability. Challenges for instance, which is obtained in phases two and three of the project are best handled by ensuring the outlined quality standards are strictly observed.Every new change in the working process is difficult and not acceptable from the employees in the beginning, but actually when the final result is positive means the solution work really well on practice. This is true and applicable only if the required standards are followed (Kuruppuarachchi, Mandal and Smith, 2002).
References Amirsayafi, P., Jin, X. and Senaratne, S., 2018. Literature review of project success as a topic in project management: gaps and needs analysis in dam engineering industry projects of Australia. InRICS COBRA 2018: The Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors held in London, UK in association with University College London, 23-24 April 2018 Jugdev, K. and Müller, R., 2005. A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success.Project management journal,36(4), pp.19-31 Kerzner, H. and Kerzner, H.R., 2017.Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons Kuruppuarachchi, P.R., Mandal, P. and Smith, R., 2002. IT project implementation strategies for effective changes: a critical review.Logistics information management,15(2), pp.126-137 Meredith, J.R., Mantel Jr, S.J. and Shafer, S.M., 2017.Project management: a managerial approach. John Wiley & Sons Nonino, F., Annarelli, A., Gerosa, S., Mosca, P. and Setti, S. eds., 2018.Project Management: Driving Complexity. PMI® Italian Academic Workshop(Vol. 43). Sapienza Università Editrice Norrie, J. and Walker, D.H., 2004. A balanced scorecard approach to project management leadership.Project management journal,35(4), pp.47-56 Shenhar, A.J. and Dvir, D., 2007. Project management research—The challenge and opportunity.Project management journal,38(2), pp.93-99
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Takey, S.M. and de Carvalho, M.M., 2015. Competency mapping in project management: An action research study in an engineering company.International Journal of Project Management,33(4), pp.784-796