Challenges of Project Management in Edinburgh Tram Project
Added on 2022-12-30
9 Pages2490 Words1 Views
|
|
|
Project Management
![Challenges of Project Management in Edinburgh Tram Project_1](/_next/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdesklib.com%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2Fiy%2F7c48190e18c1415493ae6ac428e8a0d4.jpg&w=3840&q=10)
Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
TASK...............................................................................................................................................3
i). Network analysis................................................................................................................3
ii). Linked Barchart................................................................................................................4
iii). Edinburgh Trams Operations Centre building.................................................................4
iv). 2 excavators......................................................................................................................5
v). Installation of the drainage................................................................................................6
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................6
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................7
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
TASK...............................................................................................................................................3
i). Network analysis................................................................................................................3
ii). Linked Barchart................................................................................................................4
iii). Edinburgh Trams Operations Centre building.................................................................4
iv). 2 excavators......................................................................................................................5
v). Installation of the drainage................................................................................................6
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................6
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................7
![Challenges of Project Management in Edinburgh Tram Project_2](/_next/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdesklib.com%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2Fdd%2Fb999400856f2449ba3f48bc5f1daab90.jpg&w=3840&q=10)
INTRODUCTION
This paper is designed to explain the challenges of a heavily reactionary project engaged with
project management (Bucero and Englund, 2015). The network can be split into two separate
phases. One is a mostly road line from Newhaven to St Andrews Squares throughout the
northwest and across the Ocean Port, Foundation Road as well as Leith Walk. This then goes to
Haymarket across City Centre and Level of leadership Place. The second part of the route is
mostly off-road and begins at Haymarket after the central route to Edinburgh Station before
passing by the Gyle Shopping Centre, the A8 train as well as the airport around the nation.
TASK
i). Network analysis
From the network diagram attached in the Appendix 1, a single 18.5 km line between Newhaven
as well as Edinburgh Airport via Leith, Princes Lane, Haymarket, Edinburgh Market and Gyle
shortened the planned system to 18.5 km. A group of Bilfinger Berger (civil engineering),
Siemens (electrical) as well as CAF was entered into on the grounds of a payment terms design
and development (tramcars). In summer 2008 work began. Carillion signed an earlier
arrangement for the amount of planning and the diversion of facilities. This scheme seems to be
incomplete until 2012 ahead of the initial 2011 goal as well as the estimated expense of £545
million when shown in the final chapter is expected to be surpassed. The political disagreements
between on the one hand, the Scottish Parliament as well as the other groups, Labour, Social
Democrats, Liberals, as well as the Green Party, that have traditionally supported the system is
wracking the first steps throughout the development of the initiative. The experts agree that
there are some concerns as to the accuracy of the quantitative approach that calculated the value
and makes of P90 to be 15%, which appears to be low considering the clear faith and evidence
offered in the Approved Guidance Papers currently facilities available. The risk evaluation
method is likely to be part of the confidence tendency in the quantitative approach, which would
be reasonable although risk assessment is focused on professional opinion which has been seen
to be susceptible to optimism. This appears to have been improved for Edinburgh Tram, instead
of lowering morale, by a quantitative risk study. Moreover the excitement was sustained by
strong faith in the cost estimation (Hall, 2012).
This paper is designed to explain the challenges of a heavily reactionary project engaged with
project management (Bucero and Englund, 2015). The network can be split into two separate
phases. One is a mostly road line from Newhaven to St Andrews Squares throughout the
northwest and across the Ocean Port, Foundation Road as well as Leith Walk. This then goes to
Haymarket across City Centre and Level of leadership Place. The second part of the route is
mostly off-road and begins at Haymarket after the central route to Edinburgh Station before
passing by the Gyle Shopping Centre, the A8 train as well as the airport around the nation.
TASK
i). Network analysis
From the network diagram attached in the Appendix 1, a single 18.5 km line between Newhaven
as well as Edinburgh Airport via Leith, Princes Lane, Haymarket, Edinburgh Market and Gyle
shortened the planned system to 18.5 km. A group of Bilfinger Berger (civil engineering),
Siemens (electrical) as well as CAF was entered into on the grounds of a payment terms design
and development (tramcars). In summer 2008 work began. Carillion signed an earlier
arrangement for the amount of planning and the diversion of facilities. This scheme seems to be
incomplete until 2012 ahead of the initial 2011 goal as well as the estimated expense of £545
million when shown in the final chapter is expected to be surpassed. The political disagreements
between on the one hand, the Scottish Parliament as well as the other groups, Labour, Social
Democrats, Liberals, as well as the Green Party, that have traditionally supported the system is
wracking the first steps throughout the development of the initiative. The experts agree that
there are some concerns as to the accuracy of the quantitative approach that calculated the value
and makes of P90 to be 15%, which appears to be low considering the clear faith and evidence
offered in the Approved Guidance Papers currently facilities available. The risk evaluation
method is likely to be part of the confidence tendency in the quantitative approach, which would
be reasonable although risk assessment is focused on professional opinion which has been seen
to be susceptible to optimism. This appears to have been improved for Edinburgh Tram, instead
of lowering morale, by a quantitative risk study. Moreover the excitement was sustained by
strong faith in the cost estimation (Hall, 2012).
![Challenges of Project Management in Edinburgh Tram Project_3](/_next/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdesklib.com%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2Foy%2Fbafd7ba8189c4c1d8c8bb24d9e9b30c9.jpg&w=3840&q=10)
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.