Report on Project Negotiation for The Health Payroll Plan for Queensland
Verified
Added on  2023/06/10
|12
|2419
|126
AI Summary
This report discusses the issues affecting the Queensland Health payroll systems and the negotiations and conflicts surrounding it. It includes details on the projects, participants, negotiation interaction process, methods, and outcomes.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
REPORT ON PROJECT NEGOTIATION Projects Negotiation and Conflict Report 1PROGRAM INFORMATION Program Name: The Health Payroll Plan for Queensland Date: 6/7/2018 Project Ownership: The Queensland Health Prepared By: Manager of the Project Distribution List: Project Stakeholders and the Australian Government 1.1Introduction This project focuses mainly on the issues that have been affecting the Queensland Health for years, the main issue being on the payroll systems. The organization has been faced with significant and current issues on the payroll systems since implementation in March 2010 (KPMG, 2012, p. 4). Due to this challenges, KPMG has been deployed to conduct analysis on the current status, proposed solutions, strategies, programs of work and governance frameworks in place for the Queensland Health payroll system (KPMG, 2012, p.4). In addition to that, we are going to take a look on the various conflicts and STURENT NAMESTUDENT ID1
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
REPORT ON PROJECT NEGOTIATION negotiations that has been all around the Queensland payroll systems as well as management implication on the issues. The project is subdivided into various sections and sub section as discussed below. Keywords:Payroll, Conflicts, Negotiations, Strategies 2THE PROJECTS 2.1Project 1: Forward strategy for payroll system This strategy enrolled for payroll system is well described using the diamond viewpoint which includes NTCP. According toShenhar & Dvir (2007), this approach is consideredapplicable approachas it comprisesof the four dimensions novelty, technology, complexity and pace.Novelty and Complexity and are defined as being a derivative, a considerable group and a system. Alternatively, the two uses a checklist of preferred reckoning projects which is employed to develop a conclusive way of understanding the issue(Shenhar & Dvir, 2007) said that. On the other hand, technology is said to be the applicability of modern technique to solve things in a new and advanced ways. Most healthcare industries have deployed latest technologies that help enhance the effectiveness (Abraham & Junglas, 2011) said that. Preferably the stage is applied in cases of pressing issues in the entire work (Glass, 2013).This technique is used in the forward strategy payroll systems for inventory, administration, betterment and jeopardy. The STURENT NAMESTUDENT ID2
REPORT ON PROJECT NEGOTIATION aspect is normally adapted in cases of stress arising in the whole project activities (KPMG, 2012, p. 9). 2.2Project 2: Governance and decision-making For the governance and decision-making, a single regularized learning progress is the applicable means of conducting projects tasks. In addition to that, there are two types of administrations and decision that absolutely can be done successfully and discussed in groups. Peoples’ group meet to reach and accomplish the bottom-line objective in the organization coaching process. (KPMG, 2012, p. 36). 2.3Project 3: People and change An attributable project work is the appropriate way to do it for the people and the changes. From an individual perspective, the project is considered convenient for the individuals and the changes because personality is within the individuals and identity of their culture. This Kind of outlook is used to entirely define an associates’ changes as well as culture(KPMG, 2012. p. 37). 2.4Project 4: Funding In the case of funding, projects tasks are absolutely the appropriate avenue from the complicated products and service purposes. The avenue is very suitable for funding purposes because it identifies the essential value of the project as a whole. A crystal clear idea about financial assistance is provided which is the point of view of the entire project(KPMG, 2012, p. 17) STURENT NAMESTUDENT ID3
REPORT ON PROJECT NEGOTIATION 3THE PARTICIPANTS 3.1Project 1: Forward Strategy for payroll system 3.1.1 Owner Queensland Health is the owner’s diplomacy prominence and it has a strong opposition on the relations that the whole employer has and can be identified. Furthermore, it has documents therefore it can address the imminent parole that operates together with service delivery schemes and models employed by Queensland Health in overall.(KPMG, 2012, p. 17) 3.1.2 Designers Definitely, fundamental stand for all the designers amassed shall all along be shared with the entire government and the Chief Information Officer of the Queensland (KPMG, 2012). 3.1.3 Contractors The contractors’ arbitration stature will include the entire associates in government as well as the Chief Information Officer of Queensland. 3.2Project 2: Governance and Decision-making 3.2.1 Owner Possible confrontations in the relationship whereby individuals may be in relationships with owners that adopt competence of the catalogs in handling of STURENT NAMESTUDENT ID4
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
REPORT ON PROJECT NEGOTIATION matters, benediction, uncertainties and arrangements of the program besides the well-informed practice. 3.2.2 Designers The designers contact stature shall be mutually spread by the associates and the Queensland Audit office. The capable clash designers are associated to these individuals that are used to the solitary firms structure for the portfolios or the governance of the program that is the payroll portfolio governance and the Queensland Health. Definitely, there is a brief channel among the entire financial systems.(KPMG, 2012. p.36) 3.2.3 Contactors The capable clash of lawful relatives who adopt the use of competence of programs in handling uncertainties, benedictions, challenges, program management actions as well as the well-informed lessons. 3.3Project 3: People and change 3.3.1Owner Owners’ consultation stature shall simply be Queensland Health convinced in the payroll progress by revealing the possible achievements to the line of managers and all the employed workers through the viable conflict in the interaction of the employers. This portrays steadiness advancement within the performance, the legibleness in decision making process and the modifications in the entire payroll business transaction along with the approach of working included. In addition, STURENT NAMESTUDENT ID5
REPORT ON PROJECT NEGOTIATION Communication is a form of operation with the service delivery models in the progressive way.(KPMG, 2012. p. 37) 3.3.2 Designers Designers’ consultations will develop into the core of government behavior and the Queensland Health payroll schemes of stake holders 3.3.3 Contractors Contactors consultations will possibly lead to clash of contactors’ relatives who are create constancy in the parole process thus illustrating the concrete benefit to the workers inclusive of the edge administers by creating decisive and perceptible advancements in performance(KPMG, 2012, p. 38). In addition, legit decision making together with the modifications in the payroll business transactions and working measures are seen. In this matter, communication is the elementary means in operating and service delivery ways in a progressive manner. 3.4Project 4: Funding 3.4.1 Owner The proprietor making arrangements of posts shall simplify Queensland Health capable clashes noticing individuals in which owner might want to have. Business as usual costs is passed on the base essentials which is linked with creating of Queensland Heart funds every finance intervening, scheme assistance as well as bias solutions, system refurbishment and optional modifications meanders. (KPMG, 2012, p. 17) STURENT NAMESTUDENT ID6
REPORT ON PROJECT NEGOTIATION 3.4.2 Designers Project stakeholders will consult with the designers on the locations of planning the project. The capable clashes of project constructors may lead the program associates benefiting by much perceivable aspect of sponsoring ineffectiveness enclosed by what have been acknowledged and that which is simply earned finance projects. This helps to assist in selecting elements for the forthcoming expenditure arrangements and motivation for the assessment of the finances used in projects. 3.4.3 Contractors Contractors consulting locations of the lawful mandatory specialist will definitely lead to clashes noticing someone whom the entire temporarily specialists might have business as usual expenditure to close the gap on every requirements related with the creating of the Queensland Health. These expenses are financing intervention, Structure support, blemish modification, system refurbishments along with discretionary’ modifications meanders.(KPMG, 2012, p. 17) 4.THE NEGOTIATION INTERACTION PROCESS 4.1Project 1: Forward strategy for payroll system The entire consulting positon is suggested to be totally integrative. It also puts more emphasis on decisive thinking, making esteem and fair preparations. 4.2Project 2: Governance and decision-making STURENT NAMESTUDENT ID7
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
REPORT ON PROJECT NEGOTIATION In this plan, consulting for the suggested positions is supposed to be entirely centripetal. It focuses on self-esteem, decisive thinking, conveying and fair arrangements. 4.3Project 3: People Change For this project, preparing for suggested posts, it should be very concessional employment avenue. The projects focuses on acknowledgement creating vacancy posts and strategy. 4.4Project 4: Funding For Project 4, consulting posts is definitely advocated to be centralizing. In addition it still concentrate on the decisive thinking and the fair measure. 5.THE NEGOTIATION METHODS 5.1Project 1: Forward strategy for payroll system According to Game theory, the examination of the logical actions involving interdependency is a well-established research platform which offers legit oversight into the strategic bargaining in competitive situations (McMillan, 1992). Implementing the theory, it is vital to take a look at the concession progress and the payrolls activities. The payroll transaction of an individual implies the state of STURENT NAMESTUDENT ID8
REPORT ON PROJECT NEGOTIATION his or her contentment with the payoff in which it seems to be greater when less concession are done. 5.2Project 2: Governance and decision-making Based on the negotiation theory, it mainly emphasizes on holding the negotiation procedures based on the quality aspects. From the dispute resolution continuum based on fig. 2, it is clear that the involvement of the different levels of the third party and the power of managing the settlement by the associate is a convenient model for the approach. The approach considers the interactive decisions and collaborative decision made by different groups of individuals based on the negotiation analysis (Susskind, Lecture notes 1995) 5.3Project 3: People and change Project 3 suggest that the collaborative negotiation approach combines game theory and negotiation theory to assist research teams in attaining their desired decisions. This approach also increases ties between the human resources and the IT department. STURENT NAMESTUDENT ID9
REPORT ON PROJECT NEGOTIATION 5.4Project 4: Funding For this project, arrangements made should use the negotiation approach which demands integrative relations of associates who have control over the outcomes as well as participants for can make decisive decisions. 6THE OUTCOME 6.1Project 1: Forward strategy for payroll system This is a censored kind of achievement hence as from the transaction procedures, it is an outright project 1. It aim as the unified plans along with the delivery of sustainable clarifications and also pinpoints the management and planning. Planning strategies that emphasizes on stakeholder’s involvement can change the culture of the payroll systems(Abraham & Junglas, 2011).Forward approach for sponsoring schemes, intergraded store network management and for contracting management are very essential. 6.2Project 2:Governance and decision-making It is a censored kind of procurement hence in a transaction procedure for the project 2 is entirely affirmative. It aims at entire integrated project teams and emphasizes on collaborations and coordination. In management and basic Administrations, collaboration ways of insights are essential.(Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry Report, 2013, p. 125) STURENT NAMESTUDENT ID10
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
REPORT ON PROJECT NEGOTIATION 6.3Project 3: People and Change This is censored kind of procurement hence from the entire transaction procedure from project 3. The main aim is at the unified project groups stressing on the participations and cooperation. In individuals and modification, impermanent staff association and systems schemes are also included. Modifications in coordination, Culture and learning process is a successful start for a healthcare organization according toAbraham & Junglas, (2011). 6.4Project 4: Funding This is censored kind of achievement and the whole transaction procedure for the project 4. It basically aims at the unified design, delivery, attainment arrangements and stress on the management and planning (Glass, 2013). For sponsoring all must be crystal clear, as commonly assimilated store network management, contracting management, overview, and administration designs like timetables, expenditure and time(KPMG, 2012, p. 9) STURENT NAMESTUDENT ID11
REPORT ON PROJECT NEGOTIATION Referencing Abraham, C., & Junglas, I. (2011). From cacophony to harmony: A case study about the IS implementation process as an opportunity for organizational transformation at Sentara Healthcare.The Journalof Strategic Information Systems,20(2), 177-197. Glass, R. (2013). The Queensland Health Payroll Debacle.Information Systems Management,30(1), 89-90. doi: 10.1080/10580530.2013.739899 KPMG. (2012).Review of Queensland Health payroll system. Brisbane. McMillan, M. (1992).The McMillan lectures.Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association. Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry Report. (2013). [Ebook]. Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2007).Reinventing project management: the diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Harvard Business Review Press. (Susskind, Lecture notes 1995).(1995). [Ebook]. STURENT NAMESTUDENT ID12