Table of Contents Abstract............................................................................................................................................2 Introduction......................................................................................................................................3 Project Scope and Objectives..........................................................................................................3 Requirements Specifications...........................................................................................................3 Significance/Feasibility...................................................................................................................4 Project Limitations/Constraints.......................................................................................................4 Resource Specifications...................................................................................................................5 Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................5 References........................................................................................................................................7
Abstract The report discusses the use of software to control nuclear power plants as a method of increasing safety as compared to other safety methods. The report references Duke's energy Oconee nuclear power plant that was established in 1973. The company has undergone several changes and modifications in a bid to try and address its standards in terms of safety. The use of software to control the nuclear plant was meant to replace the older and analogue control systems that were not working correctly. Also, the case references a minor control failure that happened in the 1990s necessitating a partial change in how control systems are used. In the incident, there were no employees who suffered any injuries, and no radiation leaked out of the power plant. The digital control system was added to various parts of the control system to deal with the most critical hitches, but it remained absolutely clear that Oconee’s entire control system needed a replacement.
Introduction The objectives of the case study are to replace Oconee’s control system with the use of software to control a nuclear power plant in an attempt to raise the safety standards of Duke Energy’s Oconee nuclear power plant. Duke Energy’s had suffered a minor control failure in the 1990s, and that triggered digitization of some parts of its control system. However, the case study has identified a need for replacing the whole control system with a software-controlled system. The report will be structured using various report writing styles where an introduction, project scope and objectives, requirements specification, significance of the study, project limitation, resource specification and conclusion sections will be discussed. Project Scope and Objectives The main objective of this report is to evaluate the use of software to control a nuclear power plant. The scope of the report analyses Duke Energy’s Oconee nuclear power plant. However, the report will be the basis for nuclear power plants to use software controls in their system as a technique to improve the safety of the power plant. Requirements Specifications Plant Control includes the controls systems comprised in the rotating equipment - gas turbine, steam turbine and generator- the heat regaining steam generator (HRSG), and steadiness of plant–all giving out energy for hardware and software(Zverkov, 2017). Each gas turbine, vapour turbine, generator, heat regaining steam generator, and steadiness in plant system has a regulating system that controls, protect, and screens the equipment. Since the specific control systems require to work hand in hand for effective plant functioning, information is channelled between controlling systems on Ethernet-based links(Jharko, 2013). Operators and repairs personnel use operator stations, historians, and engineering workstations to monitor plant-wide,
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
harmonized data with a normal Control software set. Remote checking of plant state and remote operation are presented from integrated customer operations centres and GE Energy Service centres. The plant entails different systems which include; safety valves, generator, emergency power supply, coolant system, feed water pump, and vapour turbine. The system controls and repairs the efficient functioning. For instance, the cooling system used to remove extra heat from the reactor core and conveyances it to another area of the plant, where the current energy can be harnessed to yield electricity. This calls for frequent management of such a system(Alam, Sarkar, & Chowdhury, 2019). Feed water pump maintains the water level in the vapour generator and nuclear reactor. The operation of such a system requires maximum and close monitoring of its operation. The generator changes kinetic energy given to it by the turbine into electrical energy. A low AC synchronous generator of the great rated power is used. Being a crucial system in nuclear reactors, its operation is closely monitored to ensure efficiency(Porthin, Liinasuo, & Kling, 2019). Steam turbine serves to change the heat confined in steam into mechanical energy. Failing of this system will derail all the process of energy production; hence, close monitoring of this system is highly recommended. Significance/Feasibility The use of software control in controlling a nuclear power plant is significant as it ensures protection, surveillance and priority control of the nuclear system. The use of software control will help Duke Energy’s Oconee to avert control failures such as the minor control failure that occurred in the 1990s. Additionally, the use of software controls will enable monitoring of safety standards which enables automatic protection and safeguard action in case a problem occurs. Surveillance through the use of software control will ensure that the nuclear
core, the main rod and the reactor systems are protected from being breached(Singh & Singh, 2019). Project Limitations/Constraints Installing a safety-related digital system is a hard, tiresome and time-consuming process. Visionary leaders are needed and have to come up with a plan that will phase out the old control system and replace it with a new software-controlled system. The process is also very expensive in a way that many nuclear power plants may not even afford it(Simonsen & Osvalder, 2015). Choosing the right partners to install the software control system for a nuclear power plant is also a great consideration for the successful adoption of a software-controlled system. Finally, there is a long and tiring process of getting the plan through the licensing process that the leaders of the power plan have to endure. Resource Specifications Duke Energy’s Oconee chose Teleperm XS system that is provided by Areva of France. Its features ensure reliability and the software have been used by other nuclear power plants elsewhere. Teleperm XS is licenced for use in eleven nations and contain the following resource specifications: a)Protection featurefor monitoring safety settings and automatic enabling of safeguards in case of a problem. b)Surveillance featuresfor monitoring the rod control, nuclear core and the reactor system. c)Priority and actuator control system featuresfor managing the control and monitoring of the operational safety system.
Conclusion A nuclear reactor is becoming one of the most sophisticated technological breakthroughs. It’s now producing a significant amount of the world’s energy requirements, and the benefit is that it yields huge amounts of energy from small amounts of fuel, minus any pollution that would be realized. This brings encouragement to those countries that have not indulged into the technology to try it for the increase of the country’s income, as this reduces the cost spent on the other methods of energy production(Liang et al., 2016). As nuclear power plant becomes a central idea in many nations, it is time to think about the safety of the people who work in these power plants and those who live near the power plants. It should be noted that power plants especially nuclear power plants have the capability of causing massive damage both to the environment and to the entire population. Therefore, safety standards, rules and regulations and measures should be put in place to avoid any hazardous occurrences. The use of software to control nuclear power plants presents a great opportunity for increasing the safety of the nuclear power plant. In future, many nuclear power plants across the globe should be able to use software controls and IT infrastructures to control their respective power plants. This will not only create a universal safety standard across all the nuclear power plants but will also ensure that no harm or disaster occurs without being detected. Many nuclear energy stakeholders are taking keen interest on the Duke Energy’s Oconee installation of software control system. If the system succeeds, the companies will borrow the methods used by Duke Energy’s Oconee and use them in their respective power plants. If the plan fails, the various concerned parties will still be looking up to Duke Energy’s Oconee to iron out the errors.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
It should be noted that many nuclear power plants have failed to use software control in their operations due to the high cost implications. In future, many players in the energy sector including the government, public and private corporations and public and private individual investors will join hands to finance the nuclear power plant projects.
References Alam, F., Sarkar, R., & Chowdhury, H. (2019). Nuclear power plants in emerging economies and human resource development: A review.Energy Procedia,160, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.111 Jharko, E. Ph. (2013). Quality Assurance for Nuclear Power Plant Control System Software. IFAC Proceedings Volumes,46(9), 1102–1107. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130619-3-RU- 3018.00227 Liang, H., Gu, P., Tang, J., Chen, W., & Gao, F. (2016). Discussion on software aging management of nuclear power plant safety digital control system.SpringerPlus,5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3780-2 Porthin, M., Liinasuo, M., & Kling, T. (2019). Effects of digitalization of nuclear power plant control rooms on human reliability analysis – A review.Reliability Engineering & System Safety. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.022 Simonsen, E., & Osvalder, A.-L. (2015). Aspects of the Nuclear Power Plant Control Room System Contributing to Safe Operation.Procedia Manufacturing,3, 1248–1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.260 Singh, P., & Singh, L. K. (2019). Design of safety critical and control systems of Nuclear Power Plants using Petri nets.Nuclear Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.02.014 Zverkov, V. V. (2017). Software and Hardware Systems in the Safety Control Systems of Nuclear Power Plants.Power Technology and Engineering,51(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-017-0809-9