logo

(solved) Property Law Assignment

   

Added on  2020-10-05

6 Pages1266 Words491 Views
Property law

Table of ContentsINTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................1CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................3REFERENCE...................................................................................................................................4

INTRODUCTIONTraditionally the classification of property was done on the basis of objects of the property rather than relying on the tests of the property. The classification did not lead to answer the question of establishment of the property relation. The objects do not fall in the ambit of traditional classification. The above statement is critically evaluated in the light of the case ‘Victoria Park racing v Taylor (1937).MAIN BODYThe traditional classification of the intellectual property can be defined as industrial property (patent, trademarks, industrial design and trade secrets) and copyright. As in the case of Victoria V Tylor the plaintiff filed a case for infringement of his copyright and broadcasting rights and demanded injunction to stop defendant from broadcasting the race related information from the adjacent premise of the plaintiff. The object concept was more detailed which defines the inventions their rights and infringements of the same. Rather, the traditional concept was followed to decided this case as under which category does the copy right law falls.Under the traditional classification of the property law the objective of the property is seen that what is the aim and objectives of different intellectual properties. Such as under the copyrights falls the original work of literacy, dream, music artistic work such as poetry, novels, movies, songs, computer software and architecture (He, Feng and Huang, 2016). In the case of Victoria V Taylor the plaintiff files a lawsuit against Taylor over the nuisance and breach of thecopyrights. The construction and use of the platform did not construct any breach of the gambling and betting law, zoning regulations and even the broadcast regulations. This lead the park authority to filed a case against Taylor of infringement of the copyrights. The issues raisedin this case was how far a person can retrain another for invading the privacy of the land which is occupied by him however desirable some limitation upon invasions of privacy might be, no authority was cited which shows that any general right of privacy exist (AN AUSTRALIAN PERSPECTIVE ON PRIVACY LAW DEVELOPMENTS, 2018). The judged passed the decision on the basis that the to broadcast a description of the occurrence from the neighbors land is not defined under the ambit of property law and do not defined an interest falling within the category which protects at law or in equity.1

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Privacy Laws and the Case of Barry Spurr
|12
|892
|67

Media Law: Breach of Privacy, Defamation, and Sub-judice Contempt
|9
|1807
|188