Application of Deep Learning PDF

Running Head: PROPOSAL
Application of Deep Learning (DL) to Natural Language Processing (NLP)
[Name of Institute]
[Name of Student]
[Date]

Proposal 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction......................................................................................................................................3
Problem Statement.......................................................................................................................4
Aim and Objectives......................................................................................................................4
Literature Review............................................................................................................................4
Advantages and Challenges.........................................................................................................5
Advantages...............................................................................................................................5
Challenges................................................................................................................................5
Motivation for Deep Learning in NLP.........................................................................................6
Dialogue Systems.........................................................................................................................9
Methods...........................................................................................................................................9
Linguistic Phenomena................................................................................................................10
Neural Network Components.....................................................................................................10
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................11

Proposal 3
Application of Deep Learning (DL) to Natural Language Processing (NLP)
Introduction
Deep Learning (DL) refers to the advances made by artificial intelligence in learning and
using neural networks such as “Deep Neural Networks (DNN), Convolutional Neural Networks
(CNN), and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN)” (Otter, et al., 2020). Recently, DL has been
effectively applied to “Natural Language Processing (NLP)” and noteworthy progress has been
made (Hasan and Farri, 2019). This article will summarize the recent advances made by DL in
NLP and discusses its benefits and challenges (Rao and McMahan, 2019). There are 5 major
tasks for NLP, including “classification, matching, translation, structured prediction, and
sequential decision-making processes” (Huang, et al., 2019).
The first four tasks can be traced back to DL methods that have overtaken the traditional
methods (Landolt, et al., 2021). Training of system and result-oriented learning from start to
finish are important features of DL, making it a useful resource for NLP. It may not be enough
just to argue and make decisions on certain grounds of language processing, which is essential
for complex issues such as multiple interchange cycles (Zhang, et al., 2020). Moreover,
integrating translation processing and neural processing and dealing with the long-tail
phenomenon is also challenging for DL in NLP (Bacchi, et al., 2019).
“Natural Language Processing (NLP)” is a software engineering subcommand that
provides support between natural language and the PC. It enables machines to acquire, process
and parse human language (Rao and McMahan, 2019). The importance of NLP as a device that
supports the perception of human-generated information is a reasonable consequence of the
contextuality of information. By better understanding the context, information becomes more
important, making it suitable for inspection and text mining (through AI) (Sorin, et al., 2020).
NLP offers this through projects and examples of human communication. The advancement of
NLP technology increasingly relies on information-driven methodologies that can help create
more remarkable and powerful models (Young, et al., 2018).
The constant advancement of computing power, such as the increased accessibility of
vast information, offers opportunities for DL, which is probably the most attractive method in
NLP, especially considering that DL is used in computer vision and speech recognition (Torfi, et
al., 2020). These advancements have led people to move from traditional information-based

Proposal 4
methods to new information-based methods of promoting NLP. The goal of this transformation
is that the new method is more efficient in terms of results and the design is simpler (Deng and
Liu, 2018).
Problem Statement
DL uses “Deep Neural Networks” to measure a large amount of information and
familiarize with the problem of information processing. It can solve any problem as long as user
have access to a large and relevant dataset(s). It also examines the important features of problem
definition. In the field of NLP, there are many important applications that are widely used by
individuals, similar to machine translation, speech recognition, and information retrieval. As DL
progressed, more and more NLP tasks were solved well with the application of DL methods.
Accordingly, a unique and meaningful AI methodology is provided to make the operation
of DL models in NLP tasks such as sentiment inspection easier and more meaningful. Syntax
entity detection is a fundamental task in NLP and is also used in many applications such as web
indexing and online advertising. However, as a fundamental and important venture in NLP, there
is much work in using deep neural networks to solve “Named Entity Recognition (NER)”
problems, whilst very little work is in applying rational methods of DL.
Aim and Objectives
The aim of this study is to explore multiple deep learning methods for NLP. The
objectives of this study are stated below:
 Implement and test the explainable DL methods
 To explore the latest practical implication practices of DL in NLP
Literature Review
According to the studies, most of the NLP problems can be formalized in these five tasks
(as mentioned above). In these tasks, words, phrases, sentences, parts and even files are generally
considered to be a series of tags (strings) and although they can handle several complicated facts
in comparison (Sorin, et al., 2020). In addition, sentences are the most common unit of
processing. Studies recently discovered that DL can be updated and viewed in the first four
assignments and is becoming a groundbreaking assignment innovation (Zhang, et al., 2020). Of

Proposal 5
all the problems of NLP, the advancement of machine translation deserves a special mention.
Neural machine translation, like machine translation with DL, has in fact overtaken the usual
measurable machine translation (Torfi, et al., 2020). The leading neural translation framework
uses sequence-by-sequence learning models with RNNs.
Interestingly, DL also enables some applications, like, DL has been effectively applied
for image recovery, where texts and images are first converted to vector representations using
CNN (Deng and Liu, 2018). These symbols are matched with the DNN and the meaning of the
image for the query is determined (Rao and McMahan, 2019). DL is also used for age-based
natural language utterances, where the structure responds accordingly to an expression and
prepares the model in sequence-by-sequence learning (Zhang, et al., 2020).
Advantages and Challenges
DL will certainly bring benefits and challenges when implied to NLP.
Advantages
One can imagine that completing the preparation and learning of representation really
separates DL from the usual AI methodologies and makes it an incredible piece of hardware for
NLP (Guo, et al., 2019).
It is normal to prepare for applying DL from start to finish (Guo, et al., 2019). This is due
to the model which is rich in representation and the data contained in the information can be
“coded” into the model. In neural machine translation, for example, the model is developed
naturally from the same corpus, usually without artificial intermediaries (Zhang, et al., 2020).
Associated to the traditional method of actual machine translation, this is obviously an advantage
where feature design is very important.
Through DL, various representations of structured information such as content and
images can be learned as true respectable vectors (Deng and Liu, 2018). This makes it possible to
process the data in different ways. For example, image recovery allows to coordinate the search
(text) for images and keep track of the most important images, as each image is treated as a
vector (Landolt, et al., 2021).
Challenges
DL has more mutual challenges, such as the lack of hypotheses, the lack of
interpretability of models, and the need for large amounts of information and incredible recorded

Proposal 6
assets (Deng and Liu, 2018). NLP presents some major challenges, most notably the problem of
handling long tails, the inability to deal directly with symbols, and the inefficiency of reasoning
and decision-making (Rao and McMahan, 2019).
Information in natural language is always sent in accordance with applicable law. For
example, the size of the jargon increases with the size of the information. This means that there
will always be situations that the prepared information cannot cover, no matter how much
prepared information there is. Describing the lengthy management problem is a great test for DL
(Deng and Liu, 2018). This problem is difficult to solve with DL alone.
Speech information is usually image information that is not identical to vector
information (respected real vectors) commonly used in DL (Otter, et al., 2020). Now the image
information in speech is converted into vector information, and then the contribution to the
neural network and the output of the neural network are converted into image information (Deng
and Liu, 2018). In fact, much knowledge of NLP is used as symbols, including language
knowledge (e.g., language structure), vocabulary knowledge, and world knowledge (such as
Wikipedia). Currently, DL strategies do not yet use this knowledge (Rao and McMahan, 2019).
The illustrated representation is not difficult to decipher and control, and the vector
representation is full of ambiguity and turbulence. The description of the amalgamation of image
and vector information and the quality of the use of these two types of information is still an
open question in NLP (Zhang, et al., 2020).
There are complex and compound tasks in NLP that only DL cannot easily detect. For
example, multi-turn exchanges are an extremely complicated process. Includes language
comprehension, language age, executive speech, knowledge base visits, and interpreters (Rao
and McMahan, 2019). Terms of communication (syntaxes) can be formalized as an ongoing
decision-making process and learning support can be used as an integral part (Hasan and Farri,
2019). It is clear that the combination of DL and supervised learning can be useful for the task
that DL itself was in the past (Yang, et al., 2019).
Motivation for Deep Learning in NLP
DL applications are based on the representation of resources and the decision making of
architecture-like DL algorithms. They relate to the information representation or the learning
structure (Hasan and Farri, 2019). The appalling thing about presenting information is that there

Proposal 7
is often a mismatch between the information that is important to the work being done and the
presentation that actually leads to great results. For example, in a surveys, it is noted that some
linguists believe that dictionary semantics, syntactic design, and context are important (Hasan
and Farri, 2019). Taking all factors into account, previous research based on the “Bag-of-Word
(BoW) model” showed sufficient executive power (Guo, et al., 2019).
The BoW model, which is generally regarded as a vector space model, contains a
representation that describes only the repetition of words and their events. BoW ignores word
requirements and contexts and considers each word as an exceptional property. BoW does not
take syntactic structure into account, but gives reasonable results for applications that some
people consider inferior. This finding proposes that modest representations in combination with
large amounts of information can fill in more or better than more unpredictable representations
(Bacchi, et al., 2019). These results confirm the debate about the importance of DL architectures
and algorithms. The advancement of NLP is often inextricably linked to powerful speech
demonstrations (Deng and Liu, 2018).
One of the goals of measurable language representation is the probabilistic representation
of word sequences in the language, which is a confusing task due to the scourge of
dimensionality (Hasan and Farri, 2019). The research is a further step in demonstrating neural
network language meant for overcoming the scourge of dimensionality by (1) learning adequate
word representations and (2) providing sequence probabilistic work (Rao and McMahan, 2019).
Compared to other areas, such as computer vision, a key test in NLP research is the use of fact
models to complete the complexity of the language's internal and external representation (Guo, et
al., 2019). A fundamental task in an NLP application is to provide a representation of encrypted
text into the required (understandable) language. This includes the learning function, which
separates important data for further processing and checking from the original information
(Otter, et al., 2020).

Proposal 8
“Considering a given sequence, the skip-thought model generates the surrounding sequences using the trained encoder. The
assumption is that the surrounding sentences are closely related, contextually”
The traditional strategy starts with the manual production of complicated functions
through careful manual review of specific applications and then moves on to algorithms to
separate the genesis of these functions and take advantage of them (Otter, et al., 2020). NLP
technology is highly information-driven and can be used in various efforts to provide rich
representations of information. Due to the vast measurement of unmarked information, learning
from unsupervised resources is seen as an urgent task in NLP (Young, et al., 2018).
Unsupervised resource learning is basically learning from unlabeled information
resources to deliver a low-dimensional representation of a high-dimensional information space
(Bacchi, et al., 2019). For this, some methods have been proposed and effectively implemented,
such as the implicit K-grouping. With the advent of DL and a large amount of unencrypted
information, unsupervised resource learning has become an important task of representative
learning, setting a precedent for NLP applications (Deng and Liu, 2018). Currently, much of
NLP's work relies on clear information, and the acceptance of unannotated information has
further encouraged the use of unsupervised technological research, driven by in-depth
information (Rao and McMahan, 2019).
Distributed representation is the advancement in the representation of conservative and
low-dimensional information, and each representation focuses on certain specific guiding
features (Hasan and Farri, 2019). For the structure of NLP, the computer system learns the
representation of the word because of the problem of the central representation of the symbol.
From the beginning, study focused on solving functions and then on learning different methods
of rendering words. Coding input sources can be characters, words, phrases, or other language
components (Young, et al., 2018). In most cases, the minimized representation of a word is more
attractive than some representations. Until now, the most effective way to choose the design and
level of the text display has been an open-ended question (Yang, et al., 2019).
Therefore, after the word2vec method was proposed, doc2vec was proposed as a verified
algorithm and named “Paragraph Vector (PV)”. The purpose of PV is to obtain a fixed length
representation of variable length and text parts, e.g., Sentences and Reports (Young, et al., 2018).
One of the basic goals of “doc2vec” is to overcome the limitations of models such as BoW and
deliver reliable results for the applications such as content rating testing (Torfi, et al., 2020). The
last method is to skip the thinking model that word2vec applies at the sentence level. When using

Proposal 9
an “Encoder-Decoder Architecture (EDA)”, the model uses a specific phrase to create a
containment phrase (Guo, et al., 2019).
Dialogue Systems
Dialogue systems are fast becoming the primary tool for human-machine collaboration,
in part because of their potential and business value (Yang, et al., 2019). An application is an
automated customer service that supports blocks and mortar networks and organisations (Otter,
et al., 2020). Clients expect to be prompt, accurate and respectful at all times in managing the
organisation and its administrative departments (Otter, et al., 2020). Due to the high cost of
skilled staff, companies usually use insightful dialogue machines. Note that the terms
conversation machine and language machine are often used in reverse (Deng and Liu, 2018).
Exchange structure is usually task oriented or not. Whilst there may be parts of “Automatic
Speech Recognition (ASR)” and “Language-to-Speech (L2S)” in a language framework, this part
of the conversation revolves solely around the language part of the exchange framework; Ideas
related to discourse innovation are ignored (Guo, et al., 2019).
Although valuable fact models are used in the backend of the exchange framework
(especially in the language acquisition module), most communicated language structures are
based on expensive manual creation and manual activity functions (Yang, et al., 2019).
Moreover, the versatility of different spaces and functions complicates these physical
construction structures. DL works with the formation of a discourse structure from the beginning
to the end of the task context, which is the systematic summary of the previous interpretation
task - the discussion of the explicit exchange of assets (Zhang, et al., 2020).
Methods
For components of the partner's neural tissue with features of linguistics, the most
popular method is to predict these features from the early stage of the neural tissue. Typically, in
this procedure, a neural model is prepared in a particular task and its payload is paused (Hasan
and Farri, 2019). The prepared model is then used at this point to create a resource representation
for another task, run it in lieu of a spoken-comment corpus, and capture the representation
(masked state formulation). Then use another classification to predict the features of interest (the
[POS] grammatical label) (Huang, et al., 2019).

Proposal 10
Different strategies for finding the correspondence between different parts of nervous
tissue and certain attributes include calculating and accounting for the number of times the
payload matches language attributes (such as anaphora targets) or directly recording the
relationship between NLP activation and certain attributes; For example, link the RNN state
formulation to depth acoustic skills or the “Melfrequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC)” in the
syntax tree (Guo, et al., 2019). This form of communication can also be done through suggestion.
For example, examine the characteristics of the ABX separation task to assess how the neural
(vision-based) model of the utterance encodes the phonology (Deng and Liu, 2018).
Linguistic Phenomena
Different types of language information are broken down, from basic attributes such as
sentence length, word position, word existence or basic word requirement to lexical, syntactic
and semantic information. Speech/phoneme information, speaker information, and style and
complement information are concentrated in neural tissue models or common audiovisual
models for speech (Torfi, et al., 2020).
Neural Network Components
With respect to the subject of study, several components of the neural tissue are
examined, including word recording, gate unit, phrase recording, and sequence-to-sequence
model (seq2seq) (Deng and Liu, 2018). In general, there is less work to do to analyze the
convolutional neural network in NLP. In language processing, experts analyze layers in deep
neural networks for language confirmation and unique speaker integration. Some checks have
also been made on the correspondence between the audio-visual or speech-visual mainstream
model or the recording of words and the convolutional representation of the image (Rao and
McMahan, 2019).

Proposal 11
REFERENCES
Bacchi, S., Oakden-Rayner, L., Zerner, T., Kleinig, T., Patel, S. and Jannes, J., 2019. DL natural
language processing successfully predicts the cerebrovascular cause of transient ischemic
attack-like presentations. Stroke, 50(3), pp.758-760.
Deng, L. and Liu, Y. eds., 2018. DL in natural language processing. Springer.
Deng, L. and Liu, Y., 2018. A joint introduction to natural language processing and to DL. In DL
in natural language processing (pp. 1-22). Springer, Singapore.
Guo, W., Gao, H., Shi, J., Long, B., Zhang, L., Chen, B.C. and Agarwal, D., 2019, July. Deep
natural language processing for search and recommender systems. In Proceedings of the
25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data
Mining (pp. 3199-3200).
Hasan, S.A. and Farri, O., 2019. Clinical natural language processing with DL. In Data Science
for Healthcare (pp. 147-171). Springer, Cham.
Huang, K., Hussain, A., Wang, Q.F. and Zhang, R. eds., 2019. DL: Fundamentals, Theory and
Applications (Vol. 2). Springer.
Landolt, S., Wambsganss, T. and Söllner, M., 2021. A Taxonomy for DL in Natural Language
Processing. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Otter, D.W., Medina, J.R. and Kalita, J.K., 2020. A survey of the usages of DL for natural
language processing. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.
Rao, D. and McMahan, B., 2019. Natural language processing with PyTorch: build intelligent
language applications using DL. “ O'Reilly Media, Inc.”.
Sorin, V., Barash, Y., Konen, E. and Klang, E., 2020. DL for natural language processing in
radiology—fundamentals and a systematic review. Journal of the American College of
Radiology, 17(5), pp.639-648.
Torfi, A., Shirvani, R.A., Keneshloo, Y., Tavvaf, N. and Fox, E.A., 2020. Natural language
processing advancements by DL: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.01200.
Yang, H., Luo, L., Chueng, L.P., Ling, D. and Chin, F., 2019. DL and its applications to natural
language processing. In DL: Fundamentals, theory and applications (pp. 89-109).
Springer, Cham.

Proposal 12
Young, T., Hazarika, D., Poria, S. and Cambria, E., 2018. Recent trends in DL based natural
language processing. ieee Computational intelligenCe magazine, 13(3), pp.55-75.
Zhang, W.E., Sheng, Q.Z., Alhazmi, A. and Li, C., 2020. Adversarial attacks on deep-learning
models in natural language processing: A survey. ACM Transactions on Intelligent
Systems and Technology (TIST), 11(3), pp.1-41.