This article discusses the negative impacts of protectionism on the US economy, including decreased competition, rising job outsourcing, slowed economic growth, and lowered living standards. It also explores how manufacturing workers are losing and what adaptations they need to cope with the evolving economy.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: Protectionism in the US Disadvantages of Protectionism for the US Economy Student Name Institutional Affiliation Course/Number Instructor Name Due Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Protectionism in the US2 Disadvantages of Protectionism for the US Economy Introduction Protectionism is a situation where the government impose trade restrictions in order to promote domestic production. Without protectionism, investors may decide to source products from other nations selling at a lower price, and then make profit after selling in the domestic economy; this is especially when the domestic prices are very high. This will hurt the domestic producers since increased imports will raise competition and thus create a disincentive to produce; thus a need for government trade restrictions. However, protectionism may bring negative impacts to the economy. These negative impacts will be discussed in this paper. This paper will also explain how the US manufacturing workers are losing. Finally, the paper shall also make a proposition of what adaptations these manufacturing workers need to have in order to cope with the evolving economy. Analysis According to Adams (2018), when a government imposes restrictions, the party that gets hurt most are the consumers. The reason for this is because a decrease in imports translates to a decrease in domestic supply, thus price level goes up since demand still remain unchanged. Guarino (2018) noted that protectionism is not good for infant industries both in the short and the long run. This is because, it creates a disincentive for development to the infant industries owing to the reduced competition. These companies will have no incentive to gain some international competitiveness and thus in the long term, they may lose if the government decided to withdraw the protectionism. The worst impact is the declined quality of the produced goods; competition improves the quality of output. It is not even clear for how long the government should protect the infant industries because at some economic times when the domestic supply is so low that the government may decide to remove protectionism so as to promote external supply. Amadeo (2018) argued that the lack of competition in the US is responsible for rising job outsourcing. Job outsourcing is responsible for raising the unemployment rate in the host country. The existence of trade barriers leads to a decline in the market for products. It’s estimated that elimination of trade barriers would result in the US income rising by $500 billion. The US economic growth is slowed down by the increasing protectionism since the restriction of trade leads to laying off of the many workers who are involved in the international trading (Gallarotti, 2018). Furthermore, closing of US borders will result in other economies also closing
Protectionism in the US3 their borders and thus even the export sector will be critically hurt (Eichengreen, 2016). This retaliation will make American produced goods to be more expensive as well as those of other nations e.g. China which retaliates by imposing a tariff against the US. As a result, investments are depressed as there is devastation of confidence. This action of president Trump resembles that of the Herbert Hoover where he signed the 1930’s Smoot-Hawley tariff which was responsible for the Great Depression (Eichengreen, 2016). Tziamalis (2017) argued that the US manufacturing workers are unlikely to benefit from the protection. This is because the demand for the manufactured goods will fall as a result of increased prices and thus fewer workers will be employed. Furthermore, the higher price of the US manufactured goods will not get a market since it has been noted that other economies may retaliate, thus eventually, production will fall. Since the demand for US exports will fall, and imports from other retaliating economies will become more expensive, there will be inflation in the US. This will raise the need to raise interest rate to minimize the impact of the rising prices. Household’s purchasing power will be lowered and thus a fall in living standards. Workers at all times need to be ready for changing markets. By this, it means that they should be in continuous learning to maintain the relevancy of their skills (Wadors, 2016). Due to the work schedules, the most convenient way for the workers to gather further skills is through online learning. Conclusion Research has identified that there are disastrous side effects of the US government implementing trade restrictions. The intended aim of promoting domestic productivity growth may in turn be useless to the industries intended to be promoted because the industries may never become innovative. The help would only be helpful if the government decided to promote the industries forever which will be more costly and almost impossible. Instead of improvements in the economy, the economic growth is slowing down and people are losing jobs. The US government should thus try to be a free trading zone other than protectionism.
Protectionism in the US4 References Adams, K. (2018). What does protectionism mean for the future of the American economy? Retrieved from https://www.marketplace.org/2018/03/09/economy/what-does-economic- protectionism-mean-future-american-economy. Amadeo, K. (2018). Why Protectionism Feels So Good, But Is So Wrong. Retrieved from https://www.thebalance.com/what-is-trade-protectionism-3305896. Eichengreen, B. (2016). What’s the problem with protectionism? Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jul/15/whats-the-problem-with- protectionism. Gallarotti, G. (2018). Trump's protectionism continues long history of US rejection of free trade. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/trumps-protectionism-continues-long- history-of-us-rejection-of-free-trade-91190. Guarino, A. (2018). The Economic Effects of Trade Protectionism. Retrieved from https://www.focus-economics.com/blog/effects-of-trade-protectionism-on-economy. Tziamalis, A. (2017). Explainer: what is protectionism and could it benefit the US economy? Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-protectionism-and-could- it-benefit-the-us-economy-73706. Wadors, P. (2016). To Stay Relevant, Your Company and Employees Must Keep Learning. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/03/to-stay-relevant-your-company-and-employees- must-keep-learning.