Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification

The provided document explores the challenges of psychiatric classification, highlighting that it does not constitute a major solution to natural illness entities. The author emphasizes the significance of addressing mental health problems with instant or solution-based support, leading to rapid outcomes in overcoming these issues. A conclusion is drawn, stating that mental illness or problem-based solutions are required to provide relevant and effective answers to these situations.

Psychiatric classifications
systems

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................3
Review of literature.....................................................................................................................3
Recommendation:.......................................................................................................................5
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................6
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................7

INTRODUCTION
Mental illness and disorder has been termed as most critical problem, which has led
critical burden on human health and capacity to handle problems in give period of time. This has
recognised as major problem for human life or stage of living (Blashfield, 2012). Mental illness
has been majorly effected by sociocultural and temporal construction at an optimised period of
time. In current medical, role of psychiatric classification system is highly responsive to led
development of business at a greater and optimised point of time. Apart from this, report will be
cover in critical analyse and explanation over about Psychiatric classification system mislabel
mental distress as abnormal disorder. This report is based on critical analysis over this problem
or disease which has major and along with critical evaluation will also be done in that context
and knowledge for its development or leading solution in context of defined problems.
MAIN BODY
Review of literature
Mental illness as a social-cultural is an argument that many of mental health conditions
are as much of social constructs as medical diagnosis, with a doctors or therapists and their
patients which are creating them together. Disorder is a major part of a mental illness, in which
person is highly incapable of working or not in situation of reacting or dominating. In medical
context, Psychiatry is a quite medical discipline and which also evolved into its present form at a
very beginning of the nineteenth century (Evans and et. al., 2013). Psychiatric professionals
continued to be elaborate on an original classification system, which is majorly resulted into
third version of the DSM. In context of mental illness, there are some major issues which has
found that abnormal behaviour of an individual person, critical condition etc., which needs to be
overcome in early period of time to led major purpose of this disease to be overcome in given
point of time. Issues such as person inability to behave properly and also with an issues of an
ineffective attitude or change in a procurement to be raised in order to getting suitable remedy of
this problem. This was noticed that diagnostic classification system has been recognised as major
solution to problem related for solution of a major problem related to remedial measures of this
disease over a given point of time. Behavioural reaction such as improper behaviour which is a
major cause of mental illness or disorder based problems of which instant solution is highly

appreciative or a kind of pro0active action planning or leading remedial base problems of this
remedy or trusted. Some outcomes out of a mental illness such as low mood, sleep disturbance,
change in food intake, fatigue and major difficulty in putting of the concentration. This is a
highly prominent to refer to medical practitioners in order to remove effect of these mental
health disorder for overcoming these issues or problems in given point of time or longer
duration. This is a highly prominent to Psychiatric classification is relatively productive and also
may lead to solution of related problem to take care of health and medical care of an individual.
The major consequences of a Psychiatric classification system has become a milestone,
because, this has enabled major researchers and also professional worldwide to communicate
about diagnoses in a standardised manner. Psychiatric diagnoses have a major impact on a lives
of the person concerned and on a health care segment or major level of discussion in context of
solving major issues of mental illness based problem or its major solution for longer period of
time (Keeley and et. al., 2016). Medical care and Psychiatric treatment inevitably requires a
respective medical/psychiatric diagnosis. Further important purpose are medical services which
are required to reimbursed by a health based insurance providers only on a diagnosis. Apart from
some issues found in mental illness, some major flaws has been found in Psychiatric
classification at a bigger and trusted context of time or level for culture of this medical issues or
problem in given point of time. Generally doctors or practitioners decides about what normality
or level of disordering of the person at an optimised context of period of time. People or any
patients need to be think over causes of mental disorder and patient are majorly allowed to
experience mental stress, till it will be judged or approved by doctor or defined practitioners.
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder is majorly belongs to DSM-5 marks
the first significant revision of a publication. Changes into the DSM were largely informed by
advancements in neuroscience, clinical and public based health needs along with identified issue
or problems with its classification system and also criteria that puts forth in a DSM IV. The
diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder basically provides a standard language with
help of which clinicians, researcher and public health official. Although, subfield of transcultural
Psychiatric has firmly established a relevance of culture and also a level of social context to led
to an individuals which are major help seeker, clinical presentation and a major response to
treatments. DSM leadership has been led increase in importance for both clinical care and basis
of research application. As a part of social environment becomes strongly linked to epigenetic

mechanisms, heritability, disease based risk and resiliency factors and also attention to these
matters in a policies of the DSM 5.
Despite of a given fact DSM is a Australia based classification system for a diagnosis of
mental disorders in conjunction of use of an official ICD statistical code numbers. This standard
are majorly based in level of an explicit disorder criteria which have been taken as nomenclature
of an mental disorders, along with this extensive explanatory text that is fully references as a part
of the electronic of this DSM (Albayrak and et. al., 2012). In order context, initiative of the DSM
5 is to develop a more valid basis for a medical based organisation which assist in mental
disorder classification which can be converted into a joint efforts of a DSM 5 taskforce.
The process of revising of the DSM 5 has played major role in providing opportunities
for doing rethinking diagnostic classification system. Psychiatric diagnosis continues to suffer
from relatively low reliability in clinical settings, and diagnoses continue to rely on clinical
phenomenology rather than on biomarkers. As, this was clearly identified that classification level
of system constitutes agreed upon definition for pragmatically assigning mental illness. In add
on, it is also revealed that Psychiatric diagnosis do not constitutes a major solution of natural
illness entities. They are major categories without any kind of natural boundaries.
Recommendation:
This is obvious that Psychiatric classification is not only matter of academic debate, but
also have direct impact on a lives of an affected and also their families. By major application of
continuum approach, many of these problems can be resolved, even without any support of
health based insurance or medical support for being acts into an effective or co-related manner of
working. Proper strategical consideration is required in this context to protect of a major
stakeholder in the medical sector to develop or enhance long life suitability for an individual to
get relative and supportive solution of a major problems relates to significant steps for
overcoming any kind of personal distress or might be association of any long term problem for
longer period of time. This would then addressed as predominately an interest of Psychiatric
patients. Lastly, it also concluded that mental illness or health based problem are required to be
overcome with major support of instant or solution through which problems can be solved or
overcome.

CONCLUSION
From an above report, it is concluded that mental problems or level of disorder are some
of the major issue which has been seen as major problem of which instant solution is required to
make solution or rapid outcomes of these issues in a rapid period of time. It is also concluded
that rapid solution of these are highly necessary because, it may lead to development of an idea
for solution of the problems related to these situation in given point of time. Lastly, it is also
concluded that mental illness or problem based on level of disorder to provide relevant solution
of these problem in given point of time.

REFERENCES
Books & Journals
Albayrak, Ö., and et. al., (2012). Does food addiction exist? A phenomenological discussion
based on the psychiatric classification of substance-related disorders and addiction.Obesity
facts. 5(2). 165-179.
Keeley, J. W., and et. al., (2016). Developing a science of clinical utility in diagnostic
classification systems: Field study strategies for ICD-11 mental and behavioral disorders.
American Psychologist. 71(1). 3.
Evans, S. C., and et. al., (2013). Psychologists' perspectives on the diagnostic classification of
mental disorders: Results from the WHO-IUPsyS Global Survey. International Journal of
Psychology. 48(3). 177-193.
Blashfield, R. K. (2012). The classification of psychopathology: Neo-Kraepelinian and
quantitative approaches. Springer Science & Business Media.
Waring, R., & Knight, R. (2013). How should children with speech sound disorders be
classified? A review and critical evaluation of current classification systems. International
Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 48(1). 25-40.
Thorpy, M. J. (2012). Classification of sleep disorders. Chemotherapeutics. 9(4). 687-701.