Ask a question from expert

Ask now

The Effect of Personality on Motivation and Organisational Behaviour

6 Pages4412 Words245 Views
   

Added on  2021-08-30

The Effect of Personality on Motivation and Organisational Behaviour

   Added on 2021-08-30

BookmarkShareRelated Documents
Psychology and Behavioral Science
International Journal
ISSN 2474-7688
Research ArticleVolume 9 Issue 2 - May 2018
DOI: 10.19080/PBSIJ.2018.09.555760
Psychol Behav Sci Int J
Copyright © All rights are reserved by Ashveen
Nuckcheddy
The Effect of Personality on Motivation and
Organisational BehaviourAshveen Nuckcheddy*
University of Northampton, UK
Submission: May 03, 2018; Published: May 30, 2018
*Corresponding author: Ashveen Nuckcheddy, University of Northampton, UK, Tel: ; Email:
Abstract
This paper performs a literature review on the topic ‘the effect of personality on motivation and organizational behavior.’ The main
research questions under investigation were does personality affect motivation and organizational behavior, and does personality affect
organizational behavior. As a literature review paper, it consulted already published sources on the topic from popular journals such as
Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Research in Personality, Academy of management
review, and Journal of Organizational Behavior. The study then went ahead to perform a theoretical review of personality theories where the
traits theory, the psychoanalytic, the humanistic, and the social cognitive theories were outlined. In the findings section, the review determined
that personality has an influence on motivation through personal emotional stability, level of aggression, and extrovert or introvert
characteristics of workers. It was also found that personality has a significant effect on organizational behavior by influencing organizational
tolerance, work environment, and work ethics. It was concluded that personality is an important topic that should be considered by
management as they strive to improving motivation of workers and optimizing organizational behavior at the workplace.
Keywords: Motivation; Personality; Organizational behavior; Management
Introduction
Psychol Behav Sci Int J 9(2): PBSIJ.MS.ID.555760 (2018) 00
1
Personality refers to the combination of a person’s characteristics that make them unique and of a distinctive character, and it
forms the basis for individual differences among organizational members. There are practically no two human beings who are
similar in all aspects. Barrick et al. [1] argue that even when their physical countenance may be similar, people tend to differ in
their personality. One of the major concerns that the human resources office still grapples within contemporary organizations is
inducing and sustaining workers’ motivation. In trying to achieve this objective, it becomes relevant that they establish the
relationship between personality with motivation and to what extent the former affects the latter. This paper seeks to establish
this and further examine it in the context of personality and individual differences in influencing organizational behavior at large.
Research Questions
a) How does personality influence employee motivation?
b) How does personality influence organizational behaviour?
Methodology
This paper takes the form of a literature review of pertinent studies related to personality, individual differences, and
motivation. According to Wee [2], the methodology of literature review papers should at least contain the themes informing the
review, databases used, keywords, and some of the major sources consulted. The themes that were found to be the most relevant
were motivation, personality, and individual differences. Of most significance were those studies that attempted to link
personality to motivation in an organisational setting. With respect to referencing literature sources, the Harvard system was
preferred where the author-date-page format was followed in citations.
Most of the studies were sourced from journals related to management, motivation, organizational behaviour, psychology, and
human resources such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Research in
Personality, Academy of management review, and Journal of Organizational Behaviour. Google Scholar was also sourced as a
The Effect of Personality on Motivation and Organisational Behaviour_1
Psychology and Behavioral Science International Journalgeneral database of some of the articles. In all cases, the primary keywords used in searching for the articles were motivation,
personality, individual differences, organisational behaviour, and human resources. The timeframe allowed for the inclusion of an
article was that it ought to have been written between the year 2010 and 2018. The keywords and timeframe were therefore the
inclusion criteria for sources that were consulted for purposes of completing this study.
Theoretical Review
Personality has been extensively researched and most scholars have found a strong relationship between personality and
motivation of workers. Fleeson [3] consider some of the most prominent theories used in this regard to be the traits theory,
psychoanalytic, humanistic, and social cognitive theories. The traits theory of personality
This theory asserts that people exude different types of personalities based on traits that are inherently in them. Several
scholars have made an attempt to explain the working of this theory. One of them is Gordon Allport, as he claims that these traits
are categorized into three groups namely cardinal, central, and secondary traits Anderson [4]. Hans Eysenck also proposed
another approach in line with the traits theory by categorizing people according to three scales in the determination of their
personality.
Dinger et al. [5] argue that the traits theory and all its approaches are closely related to motivation at the workplace. As a
human resources manager, one needs to explore the traits of their members in an organization in order to understand their
personalities. According to their assessment, a good human resources manager would look into whether such a person is
introvert, and that he works best when alone, instead of concluding that such a person is absolutely unproductive. In that way,
Klotz [6] feel that the presence of other workers would be a demotivating factor rather than a motivating one for this worker.
The psychoanalytic theory of personality
The theory is attributed to Sigmund Freud. According to Spence [7], it asserts that one’s personality is composed of three
dimensions namely the id, ego, and super ego. The id is the selfish part of an individual, and it will always seek to satisfy them
even at the expense of others. The super ego is the most moral and socially sensitive of one’s personality as it seeks to prevent
them from committing evil just because it is wrong. The ego is the mediating dimension between the aforementioned aspects. It
seeks to create a compromise between the arguments of the two thereby leading to a more composed resolution. Individual
differences manifest from the differences in the levels of these three dimensions of personality in a person Mc Cann [8] (Figure 1).
The humanistic theory of personality
How to cite this article: Ashveen N. The Effect of Personality on Motivation and Organisational Behaviour. Psychol Behav Sci Int J. 2018; 9(2):
555760. DOI: 10.19080/PBSIJ.2018.09.555760.002
This school of thought decried the issues that the former trait and psychoanalytical theories of personality failed to address.
Consequently, they designed a different perspective to explain differences in personalities among people Quinney [9]. Two
common scholars who are widely known for advocating for the humanistic approach of personality are Abraham Maslow and Carl
Rogers. Abraham Maslow drew from his needs hierarchy theory to develop an approach towards personality. According to him,
all people are guided by their need to achieve self-actualization and so is their personality. On the other hand, Carl Rogers
developed an approach that he called the peoplecentred theory. In this theory, he suggests that personality is a combination of
beliefs, thoughts, and feelings. He indicates that people are always aware of their self-concept. He also introduced the elements of
congruence and incongruence. Congruence is when there is a match between self-concept and reality while incongruence is when
there is a mismatch. This is in agreement with Quinney [9], as they state that good personalities arise when there is congruence
and the opposite is true.
The social cognitive theory of personality
The social cognitive theory advocates for the fact that personality is something that one can learn from people and their
environment. Walter Mischel developed this theory where he opined that people are social beings who have the ability to learn
from their environment what is good and resist adopting what is deemed to be wrong. This is a departure from the former traits
theory as it is against the notion that personality is in born. Mischel believes that most attributed of personality are acquired.
Sherman et al. [10] particularly argue that one’s personality essentially depends on the person-situation rather than trait-state
(Figure 2).
The Effect of Personality on Motivation and Organisational Behaviour_2
Psychology and Behavioral Science International Journal
Criticism of personality theories
Bettencourt et al. [11] have criticized trait theories for being too simplistic. Some scholars argue that even when one is said to
have certain traits; it is not always that they tend to manifest. For instance, the source argues that the way someone reacts to a
given stimulus today might be absolutely different from the way they react to the same stimulus in future. The psychoanalytical
set of personality theories also faces the criticism that it has a narrow focus, seems patriarchal, and lacks a scientific basis Klotz
[6]. There is no experiment that has successfully proven Freud’s theory, and it therefore does not have an empirical backing for its
assertions Parks-Leduc [12]. Humanistic approaches have also received a fair share of criticism mostly for the fact that they are
not objective in nature, thereby rendering its findings unreliable. Finally, social cognitive theory of personality has been criticized
for its findings being too preliminary, and that it fails to properly account for the relationships between social cognition,
behaviour, behaviour, and personality Klotz [6].
Findings
Impact of personality on motivation
Emotional stability and motivation
Personality has been found to affect the manner in which persons are willing to be affected by motivation strategies as
proposed and or implemented by management. More specifically, studies have affirmed that persons with emotional stability and
those who rank low on the psychoticism are more willing to be receptive to motivation techniques Jaeggi [13]. On the other hand,
persons with more aggressive personalities tend to be resistant to management even on things that are beneficial to them. For
instance, when management finds that the staffs can be well motivated by inducing job rotation program, some workers may
resist this viewing it as a means to allow ‘outsiders’ to their roles. Conway et al. [14] argue that most of such workers only
appreciate monetary incentives as the sole strategy for improving their levels of motivation.
Level of aggression and motivation
With respect to Lee [15], this notion is squarely envisaged in Vroom’s Expectancy theory, which suggests that the motivation
of an employee and their ultimate performance is affected by personality among other factors such as experience, skills, and
abilities. This notion is consistent with the research compiled by Avery [16], which opines that valence is the central tenet that
comes into question whenever personality is linked with motivation. It is concerned with the emotional orientations of workers
with respect to the suggested rewards, where workers with aggressive personalities will tend to be aligned to aggressive and
physical rewards for them to feel motivated. Employees with less aggressive tendencies are likely to be attracted to soft and more
qualitative aspects while selecting the rewards they prefer Bettencourt [11]. Emotional orientations are a direct product of
people’s personalities, and therefore the findings made in the studies above provide evidence of a link between personality and
motivation.
Fi
gu
re
1:

Lume
n
learni
ng
[25].
Figur
e 2:
Lumen
learning 2012.
The Effect of Personality on Motivation and Organisational Behaviour_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Linking Workplace Aggression to Employee Well-Being and Work: The Moderating Role of Family-Supportive Supervisor Behaviors (FSSB)
|33
|16963
|127

Assignment on Comparing the Effectiveness of Individual Coaching, Self-Coaching, and Group Training
|17
|17909
|99

BIS0010 Assessment 1 Template
|13
|5177
|191

Journal of Research And Report in Psychology
|6
|7086
|30

CSIS 341-Security Policy on Internet Usage
|6
|2645
|267

Effect of Obesity and Stress at Workplace among Healthcare Workers Contributing to Absenteeism
|19
|4634
|28