SPSS Output Analysis for CHNG_ENDUR and SEX

The provided content is an assignment on Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) with a journal article review section. The SPSS part involves analyzing data on age, CHNG_ENDUR, and SEX for two exercise groups separately, including descriptive statistics, line graphs, pie charts, and summary statistics. The journal article review section discusses the study's results, which examine the link between victimization and immigrant status among youth, and presents four tables with mean, standard deviation, confidence intervals, and odds ratios.

PUBH 6033—Week 2 Assignment 1
Hands on SPSS!
(Rubric included)
Answers
QUESTION type answers below Score (to be entered
by instructor)
1. How many participants were female? ______18__________ ____ / 2 point
2. How many participants were aged 40–49
years? _______8_________ ____ / 2 points
3. What percent of participants were 39
years old or younger? _______5%_________ ____ / 2 points
4. How many participants had 5 liter/min.
increase in their maximal oxygen uptake? _______5_________ ____ / 2 points
5. How many participants had >7 liter/min.
increase in their maximal oxygen uptake? _______4_________ ____ / 2 points
For exercise types 1 and 2 combined:
6. What is the mean for AGE? ______35.7__________ ____ / 2 points
7. What is the median for AGE? ____ _34.5___________ ____ / 2 points
8. What is the standard deviation for AGE? ______11.8152__________ ____ / 2 points
9. What is the mean for CHANGE_ENDUR? _____ 4.175___________ ____ / 2 points
10. What is the median for CHANGE_ ENDUR? ____4.000_________ ____ / 2 points
11. What is the range for CHANGE_ ENDUR? ____ _7.000___________ ____ / 2 points
12. What is the standard deviation for
CHANGE_ ENDUR? _____1.7525___________ ____ / 2 points
For exercise type 1 (walking and strength training):
13. What is the mean for CHANGE_ ENDUR? _____4.85___________ ____ / 2 points
14. What is the median for CHANGE_ ENDUR? ____ 5.00____________ ____ / 2 points
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 1 of 12

15. What is the standard deviation for
CHANGE_ ENDUR? ____1.4244__________ ____ / 2 points
For exercise type 2 (walking only):
16. What is the mean for CHANGE_ ENDUR? _____3.50___________ ____ / 2 points
17. What is the median for CHANGE_ ENDUR? ____ 3.00____________ ____ / 2 points
18. What is the standard deviation for
CHANGE_ ENDUR? ______1.8209__________ ____ / 2 points
Step 11: Paste all required output below.
A. Output—SPSS Codebook
ID
Value
Standard Attributes
Position 1
Label ID
Type Numeric
Format F8.2
Measurement Scale
Role Input
N Valid 40
Missing 0
Central Tendency and
Dispersion
Mean 20.5000
Standard Deviation 11.69045
Percentile 25 10.5000
Percentile 50 20.5000
Percentile 75 30.5000
AGE
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 2 of 12

Value
Standard Attributes
Position 2
Label AGE
Type Numeric
Format F8.2
Measurement Scale
Role Input
N Valid 40
Missing 0
Central Tendency and
Dispersion
Mean 35.7000
Standard Deviation 11.81524
Percentile 25 27.0000
Percentile 50 34.5000
Percentile 75 43.0000
SEX
Value Count Percent
Standard Attributes
Position 3
Label SEX
Type Numeric
Format F8.2
Measurement Nominal
Role Input
Valid Values 1.00 Male 22 55.0%
2.00 Female 18 45.0%
EXERCISE
Value Count Percent
Standard Attributes
Position 4
Label EXERCISE
Type Numeric
Format F8.2
Measurement Nominal
Role Input
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 3 of 12

Valid Values 1.00 Walking and
strength training
20 50.0%
2.00 Walking 20 50.0%
CHNG_ENDUR
Value Count Percent
Standard Attributes
Position 5
Label CHNG_ENDUR
Type Numeric
Format F8.2
Measurement Nominal
Role Input
Valid Values
1.00 2 5.0%
2.00 3 7.5%
3.00 12 30.0%
4.00 8 20.0%
5.00 5 12.5%
6.00 6 15.0%
7.00 2 5.0%
8.00 2 5.0%
B. Output—all ungrouped frequency distribution tables:
AGE
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 18.00 2 5.0 5.0 5.0
19.00 1 2.5 2.5 7.5
22.00 3 7.5 7.5 15.0
23.00 1 2.5 2.5 17.5
25.00 1 2.5 2.5 20.0
26.00 1 2.5 2.5 22.5
27.00 3 7.5 7.5 30.0
28.00 1 2.5 2.5 32.5
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 4 of 12

29.00 3 7.5 7.5 40.0
30.00 1 2.5 2.5 42.5
31.00 1 2.5 2.5 45.0
33.00 1 2.5 2.5 47.5
34.00 1 2.5 2.5 50.0
35.00 1 2.5 2.5 52.5
37.00 1 2.5 2.5 55.0
38.00 2 5.0 5.0 60.0
39.00 2 5.0 5.0 65.0
40.00 1 2.5 2.5 67.5
41.00 1 2.5 2.5 70.0
42.00 1 2.5 2.5 72.5
43.00 2 5.0 5.0 77.5
45.00 1 2.5 2.5 80.0
47.00 1 2.5 2.5 82.5
49.00 1 2.5 2.5 85.0
50.00 2 5.0 5.0 90.0
54.00 1 2.5 2.5 92.5
55.00 1 2.5 2.5 95.0
61.00 1 2.5 2.5 97.5
63.00 1 2.5 2.5 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0
SEX
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Male 22 55.0 55.0 55.0
Female 18 45.0 45.0 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0
EXERCISE
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 5 of 12

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Walking and strength
training
20 50.0 50.0 50.0
Walking 20 50.0 50.0 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0
CHNG_ENDUR
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1.00 2 5.0 5.0 5.0
2.00 3 7.5 7.5 12.5
3.00 12 30.0 30.0 42.5
4.00 8 20.0 20.0 62.5
5.00 5 12.5 12.5 75.0
6.00 6 15.0 15.0 90.0
7.00 2 5.0 5.0 95.0
8.00 2 5.0 5.0 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0
C. Output—descriptive/summary statistics for both exercise groups combined:
Statistics
AGE CHNG_ENDUR
N Valid 40 40
Missing 0 0
Mean 35.7000 4.1750
Median 34.5000 4.0000
Mode 22.00a 3.00
Std. Deviation 11.81524 1.75247
Range 45.00 7.00
a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is
shown
D. Output—line graphs for CHNG_ENDUR for each exercise group separately:
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 6 of 12

E. Output—pie charts for SEX for each exercise group separately:
F. Output—descriptive/summary statistics for each exercise group separately:
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 7 of 12

Statistics
EXERCISE AGE CHNG_ENDUR
Walking and strength
training
N Valid 20 20
Missing 0 0
Mean 34.8500 4.8500
Median 33.5000 5.0000
Mode 27.00a 4.00a
Std. Deviation 11.19810 1.42441
Range 43.00 5.00
Walking
N Valid 20 20
Missing 0 0
Mean 36.5500 3.5000
Median 36.0000 3.0000
Mode 22.00 3.00
Std. Deviation 12.63443 1.82093
Range 45.00 7.00
a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown
Section below (scoring) is to be completed by Instructor
Scoring Rubric for Week 2 Assignment1—Hands on SPSS (60 points)
Questions
18 questions (worth 2 points each)
____ / 36 points possible
SPSS Output
Six SPSS outputs (4 points each for each of the following):
A. Output—SPSS Codebook
B. Output—all ungrouped frequency distribution tables:
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 8 of 12

C. Output—descriptive/summary statistics for both exercise groups combined:
D. Output—line graphs for CHNG_ENDUR for each exercise group separately:
E. Output—pie charts for SEX for each exercise group separately:
F. Output—descriptive/summary statistics for each exercise group separately:
____ / 24 points possible
Initial Score (60 possible points):
Timeliness Factor (late points deducted):
Total Score (60 possible points):
Instructor comments:
Assignment 2: Journal Article Review
Summarize the major results of the study
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 9 of 12

In the study, a supplementary analyses was performed to examine the link that exists between
victimization across race/ethnicity and immigrant status while controlling for the
sociodemographic factors. The authors established that youth immigrants who are either Non-
Hispanic black or Non-Hispanic white were more likely (significantly) than the youths of
corresponding ethnicity/race born in U.S. to report having been bullied or experienced any form
of bullying once or more than once in the previous month. However, there were no any
significant differences observed between U.S.-born and immigrant Asian or Hispanic youth
(Brandy, Michael , Christopher , & Sharon , 2016).
Describe the information presented in tables and/or graphs
Four tables are presented for this report. The first table (table 1) presents the mean, standard
deviation as well as the 95% confidence interval of the means. Also presented is the 95%
confidence interval for the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and adjusted odds ratio (AOR).
Table 2, gives the percentages of participants who reported the various bullying forms. The
confidence intervals are also given for the percentages as well as for the unadjusted odds ratio
and adjusted odds ratio (Brandy, Michael , Christopher , & Sharon , 2016).
Table 3 presented the adjusted odds ratio as well as the confidence intervals for the various
bullying forms meted to the participants grouped into males and females.
The last table (table 4), presented the mean and the standard deviation of the responses related to
the bullying experience. Both unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio have also been presented.
Briefly summarize the major conclusions of the study
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 10 of 12

The paper concludes by admitting that there are greater risks as well as unique challenges that
the immigrant youths experience. The authors suggest that prevention and other intervention
measures need to be tailored to the specific needs and circumstances of the immigrant youths
(Peguero & Jiang , 2014). They propose that further research that aims at understanding the
specific mechanisms and factors involved in bullying victimization among immigrant youth
needs to be undertaken in future.
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 11 of 12

References
Brandy, R. M., Michael , G. V., Christopher , P. S.W., & Sharon , V. (2016). Bullying
Victimization Among School-Aged Immigrant Youth in the United States. Journal of
Adolescent Health, 58, 337-344.
Peguero , A. A., & Jiang , X. (2014). Social control across immigrant generations: Adolescent
violence at school and examining the immigrant paradox. Journalof Criminal Justice, 42,
276-87.
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 12 of 12