Nuclear Disaster Report: Public Health, Risk Assessment, Preparedness
VerifiedAdded on 2022/09/26
|3
|444
|20
Report
AI Summary
This report examines the preparedness and response to potential nuclear disasters, focusing on public health implications. It highlights the importance of emergency response plans, community preparedness, and the roles of various agencies, including federal, state, and local authorities. The repor...

Running head: Public Health 1
PUBLIC HEALTH
Student’s Name
University
Course
Date
PUBLIC HEALTH
Student’s Name
University
Course
Date
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

Public Health 2
1. Does the United States’ emergency response plan have a process for managing a
major nuclear disaster?
American nuclear plants have been built and designed to securely withstand a broad
range of regular and other dangerous events. The personnel are well trained and can take
the required actions to regulate and reduce any unusual activity arising. The Federal
government is also urging companies to create a nuclear power emergency plan .The
emergency plan is supposed to take care of the citizens and specify the responsive actions
to be done in case of a risky event. Good emergency response is as a result of a jointly
support, preparedness, and planning among various companies. This involves companies
that deal with plants, State, federal, and local agencies. The plans are supposed to be
applied during an event that is risking the lives of the citizens. The industries that deal
with nuclear plants pay a considerable fee to the State and other local authorities. The
cost is paid to fund emergency plans. The emergency plans are still evolving (Morgan,
Cabrera & Brown,2018).
2. Discuss the medical response preparedness plans in communities co-located with
nuclear plants.
Good resilience and mitigating the nuclear incident results are facilitated by proper
preparation, training, and planning. Other factors also involved include; continuous
interaction, regular practices, doing an evaluation of the parties involved, effective
communication and improving on new technology, science, ideas and experience. The
public health and their planning teams need a multi-faceted, intricate systematic attention
1. Does the United States’ emergency response plan have a process for managing a
major nuclear disaster?
American nuclear plants have been built and designed to securely withstand a broad
range of regular and other dangerous events. The personnel are well trained and can take
the required actions to regulate and reduce any unusual activity arising. The Federal
government is also urging companies to create a nuclear power emergency plan .The
emergency plan is supposed to take care of the citizens and specify the responsive actions
to be done in case of a risky event. Good emergency response is as a result of a jointly
support, preparedness, and planning among various companies. This involves companies
that deal with plants, State, federal, and local agencies. The plans are supposed to be
applied during an event that is risking the lives of the citizens. The industries that deal
with nuclear plants pay a considerable fee to the State and other local authorities. The
cost is paid to fund emergency plans. The emergency plans are still evolving (Morgan,
Cabrera & Brown,2018).
2. Discuss the medical response preparedness plans in communities co-located with
nuclear plants.
Good resilience and mitigating the nuclear incident results are facilitated by proper
preparation, training, and planning. Other factors also involved include; continuous
interaction, regular practices, doing an evaluation of the parties involved, effective
communication and improving on new technology, science, ideas and experience. The
public health and their planning teams need a multi-faceted, intricate systematic attention

Public Health 3
by involving the local, federal, state, territorial and tribal authorities, international
partners, volunteers and other industries (Chatfield, Reddick & Anggoro, 2016)
3. Is your community at risk of a nuclear disaster?
My community is at a higher risk because studies show that approximately seventy-five
percent of great nuclear disasters, this involves explosions, loss of coolants and fires have
taken place in the nation. All these disasters have occurred both in emergency and normal
activities.
References
Chatfield, A., Reddick, C., & Anggoro, Y. (2016). Indonesia’s Digital Infrastructures for
Nuclear Energy Policy Transparency.
Morgan, K. A., Cabrera, F. T., & Brown, R. M. (2018). U.S. Patent No. 9,881,702.
Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
by involving the local, federal, state, territorial and tribal authorities, international
partners, volunteers and other industries (Chatfield, Reddick & Anggoro, 2016)
3. Is your community at risk of a nuclear disaster?
My community is at a higher risk because studies show that approximately seventy-five
percent of great nuclear disasters, this involves explosions, loss of coolants and fires have
taken place in the nation. All these disasters have occurred both in emergency and normal
activities.
References
Chatfield, A., Reddick, C., & Anggoro, Y. (2016). Indonesia’s Digital Infrastructures for
Nuclear Energy Policy Transparency.
Morgan, K. A., Cabrera, F. T., & Brown, R. M. (2018). U.S. Patent No. 9,881,702.
Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide
1 out of 3
Related Documents

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.