Critique and Analysis of Methodology in Public Health Studies
Verified
Added on 2023/06/10
|7
|1155
|164
AI Summary
This article provides a critique and analysis of the methodology used in three public health studies. The studies include a cohort study on cannabis use and mental health, a case-control study on campylobacteriosis, and a birth cohort study on partner violence and mental health outcomes.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: CRITIQUE AND ANALYSIS OF METHODOLOGY 1 Program Planning and Evaluation in Public Health
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
CRITIQUE AND ANALYSIS OF METHODOLOGY 2 Article 1 ‘Cannabis Use and Mental Health in Young People: Cohort Study’ The title of the article is very authentic. It gives the reader a clear picture of the research contained in the journal article. It indicates the problem studied, which is Cannabis use, the effect of the problem evaluated which is mental health and the area of study which is the young people (Paton et al., 2002). It proves to be a very good title. It is a cohort study which aims at checking if the risk factor of cannabis by young people and the effects mentally associated with it. Research Methodology According to the study, the cohort research has applied a quantitative research. The research design got based on a seven-wave cohort study over seven years. Quantitative analysis focuses on looking at cause and effects as well as giving predictions of a phenomenon. They have used sampling and individually random sampling to collect their research data. They used participant review in waves as well as telephone assisted computer interviews to collect research data. The method of measurement used was the interview measure of depression and anxiety. Critique of the Methodology The choice of methodology made by the authors which are a cohort study is excellent for the study. It gives the research a simple method of data collection and analysis. Quantitative research focuses on looking at cause and effects as well as providing predictions of a phenomenon (Davies & Hughes, 2014).Since the research aims to study the behavior of youths under the controlled effects of cannabis use, the choice of methodology was excellent to the specific study.
CRITIQUE AND ANALYSIS OF METHODOLOGY 3 The interview measure of depression and anxiety used by the scholars was successful to give the study its extreme measures. Recommendations The research article is written on the best structure thus it should be published because it offers knowledge to the field of health. Article 2 Title "Campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: results of a case-control study"by Eberhart-Phillips et al (1997), is the title of the study which perfectly suits their education. The title gives the clear picture of the type of research which is a case control. Research Methodology The study employs a case-control design to achieve its objectives. A case-control identifies factors that lead to a medical condition (Karami et al., 2016). The research data was collected via home-based interviews using questionnaires. The study selected a sample of 4 urban centers in New Zealand which had the higher cases of Campylobacteriosis.Case-patients got reached by telephone. The study used logistic regression as the tool for analyzing the data to obtain the results. Critique of the Methodology
CRITIQUE AND ANALYSIS OF METHODOLOGY 4 Thestudymethodologywasanexcellentoneforthestudywhichfocusedonalarge geographical area. The sample selected by the survey was reasonably representative. The study got approvals from the ethics committees in all the four centers chosen for the study. Logistic regression and exposure and second matching of data as well as dichotomous categories were matched to obtain the CI on a 95% base rate. The methods used in the study get well described in enough detail. They provided the odds ratios as well as the 95% CI independently. The Recommendations The article is excellent in its structure, has a unique argument and it gives the health scholars new knowledge that was missing in the field hence its right to publish it. Article 3 Title The article, "Partner Violence and Mental Health Outcomes in a New Zealand Birth Cohort" written by Fergusson, Horwood & Ridder (2005).The title is perfect as it gives the readers of the article at first glance, a clear understanding of the objectives and scope of the study. Research Methodology The research used data obtained from secondary sources. A cohort study design was used to accomplish the study objectives. It also used sampling and interviews to collect data from the selected study population. Diagnostic interview for children got used as an instrument for interview. Critique of Research Methodology
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
CRITIQUE AND ANALYSIS OF METHODOLOGY 5 The research methodology approach selected was a cohort study, and it is an excellent method for sampling which involved multiple samples (cohorts). The examples helped the research to meet its objectives admirably. The collection of data was appropriate to the research question. Information about the participants gets adequately given in the methodology. The study also made efforts to avoid and eliminate biasness. The study observed ethical considerations and standards. Recommendations The article is right to be published as a journal because it is well structured, gives diverse knowledge on the phenomena to scholars.
CRITIQUE AND ANALYSIS OF METHODOLOGY 6 References Eberhart-Phillips, J., Walker, N., Garrett, N., Bell, D., Sinclair, D., Rainger, W., & Bates, M. (1997). Campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: results of a case-control study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 51(6), 686-691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00202.x Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Ridder, E. M. (2005). Partner violence and mental health outcomes in a New Zealand birth cohort. Journal of marriage and family, 67(5), 1103- 1119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00202.x Patton, G. C., Coffey, C., Carlin, J. B., Degenhardt, L., Lynskey, M., & Hall, W. (2002). Cannabis use and mental health in young people: cohort study. Bmj, 325(7374), 1195- 1198. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7374.1195 Karami, S., Daughtery, S. E., Schwartz, K., Davis, F. G., Ruterbusch, J. J., Wacholder, S., ... & Moore, L. E. (2016). Analgesic use and risk of renal cell carcinoma: A case‐control, cohort and meta‐analytic assessment. International journal of cancer, 139(3), 584-592. Davies, M. B., & Hughes, N. (2014).Doing a successful research project: Using qualitative or quantitative methods. Macmillan International Higher Education.