Puma's Corporate Social Responsibility

This assignment examines Puma's commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Students are tasked with analyzing Puma's sustainability practices, ethical standards, and environmental impact, drawing upon provided resources such as Puma's official website, reports, news articles, and academic literature. The analysis should evaluate the effectiveness of Puma's CSR initiatives and identify areas for potential improvement.

PUMA
Introduction
Ethics are the basic values and morals on the basis of which an entity functions. Ethics are what
govern the actions of an individual and the same is also true for the organizations. The role of
ethics is enhanced in businesses as the adherence of ethics results in additional advantage for a
company (Smith, 2008). An ethical company is more likely to be successful in comparison to an
unethical company, which would be constantly faced with issues from different stakeholders,
particularly government, customers and employees. As a result of this, the work of the
organizations is conducted by following the leading ethical theories, to the line of utilitarianism,
virtue ethics, and deontology (Chonko, 2012).
Governance is another crucial component which has to be kept into consideration when the
business of an entity is undertaken. Governance, in its literal terms, refers to the process whereby
decisions are made on the basis of expectations, management and proper systems (Grindle,
2014). A concept stemmed from governance is corporate governance which relates to the
processes, rules and practices which are used for directing and controlling the company. So, in
essence, corporate governance is the manner of governing the corporation in terms of the impact
of its actions over the different stakeholders (Fukuyama, 2013).
In the following parts, an attempt has been made to cover these concepts in reference to the
practices being followed by Puma. In doing so, the organizational culture of Puma would be
discussed particularly in context of its objectives related to ethics and governance. The
discussion would then move on to the social responsible activities of the company, followed by

PUMA
the ethical perspective of the company. Before concluding the assignment, the justification
would be given on the focus of the company on its triple bottom line.
Organizational Culture
Organisational culture refers to the behaviours and the values, which make a contribution
towards the unique social and psychological environment of any company or business entity. It is
based on the expectations, values, philosophies and experiences of the organization, which it
upholds and is usually express in terms of interactions with outside world, expression of self-
image, internal working and future expectations (Huhtala, Feldt, Hyvönen and Mauno, 2013).
Needle (2004) has highlighted that organizational culture shows the collective beliefs, principles
and values of the members of the organizational and is a product of factors including the history
of the organization, its people, market, product, type, technology, management style, kind of
employees, strategy and the like. Rosauer (2013) stated that it was an emergence, which was a
complex and an incalculable state, which results from mixing a handful of simple ingredients. In
view of Ravasi and Schultz (2006), it was a set of shared assumptions which act as a guidance to
what takes place in a company through defining proper behaviour for different situations.
The organizational culture at Puma is such which promotes creativity, as well as, new ideas
which help Puma being placed before the other brands. The company focuses on personal
commitment, passion and responsibility. In the culture of the company, diversity, individuality
and internationality are deemed as key components and this helps the company in producing
unique teams which help it in making certain that the company is successful and is aligned with
the tag line of the company, i.e., forever fast (Puma, 2017a). In doing so, the company recruits
and promotes talent from across the globe. The company also emphasis on the local knowledge

PUMA
towards the success of the company and so, it works on empowering the people for allowing
them to make the decisions. The company has a developed structure which allows the local
managers in getting real time responsibility and also in making certain that the company provides
tailored results based on the demand of the market. And in doing so, the standards have to be
maintained in addition to the management of risks across the group (Puma Energy, 2017a).
The corporate governance at Puma as an entire group is deemed as a major corporate policy. In
terms of the theme of this discussion, the objectives of the company for its governance aspects
resolve around three points. First, the company aims to support performance driven business
across the globe where the focus is on growth. Second, the company looks forward at
maximising the operational flexibility for promoting an approach which is light touched based
for central management for empowering the individuals at local levels. And lastly, company
aims to work towards promoting accountability and transparency in every aspect of the
operations of the company (Puma Energy, 2017b).
The company recognizes that it has to follow different standards and regulations cross the globe.
And irrespective of these regulatory compliances, the company deems it crucial for upholding
ethical standards and operate as per the applicable laws. Hence, for the company, compliance is a
crucial factor which translates into the success of the company. There are simple objectives with
regards to the ethical conduct. And these are summarized in the Code of Ethics drawn by the
company. The goal is for the employees, suppliers and customers, on which the basic framework
of this code is applicable, are expected to read these codes and act on them properly and included
in these are areas like conflicts of interests and anti-corruption. This is because the company
recognizes that attaining its goals is only possible when everyone plays the game by rules (Puma,
2014).

PUMA
Corporate Social Responsibility
Social responsible activities of a company can be best located in the corporate social
responsibility related activities undertaken by the companies. Corporate Social Responsibility, or
CSR, refers to the duty of the companies with regards to the impact of their actions and decisions
on the different stakeholders of the company (Dima, 2016). Crowther (2008) describes it as a
curial management strategy, where the social, economic and environmental benefits for all the
stakeholders are combined. Zhao (2014) highlighted that owing to the increase in the interest and
awareness surrounding CSR the companies are putting efforts and enhanced focus on CSR
related activities.
Crane (2008) believes that CSR is going beyond the obligations of the company and mitigating
the consequences of the actions of the business on the environment and the society, while at the
same time, earning profits for the company. As per Sprinkle and Maines (2010), it focuses on
making the environment and the society better by the company, and given emphasis to
sustainability. Mallin (2009) highlighted the benefits of adopting CSR activities, in terms of
getting enhanced goodwill, which attracts stakeholders towards the company. This includes
attracting and retaining talent, particularly when the company is focused on ensuring the safety
and health of the workers as a priority, amongst the other things (Gomez and Crowther, 2012).
The efforts employed by Puma have resulted in rewards for the company, where Puma Energy,
which is one of the companies of Puma group, won 2014 Award for Corporate Social
Responsibility. The company got this award from Communitas as it was nominated for reducing
fatalities in developing nations. This submission was based on the efforts of the company in its
Global Road Safety Campaign (Puma Energy, 2014). The company follows German Corporate

PUMA
Governance Code and adjusts its objectives based on the composition of the Administrative
Board which addresses the present developments in this code. This code covers the mandatory
statutory requirements, recommendations and regulations for supervising and managing the
listed companies for responsible corporate governance. The sustainability function of the
company was integrated in the Group Sourcing of Puma in 2016 for making certain that the
environmental and social issues, along with the standards of corporate governance were properly
integrated into the daily activities of the company (Puma, 2016a).
The company’s corporate policy effectively implements corporate governance principles. In this
regard, responsibility and transparency are deemed as prerequisites for attaining the targets of the
company and for increasing the value if the company in context of sustainability (Puma, 2017c).
As a measure of CSR, the company is focused on reducing its CO2 emissions and working
towards reducing its waste. The Administrative Board and the Managing Directors of Puma work
in a manner that the interests of the company are aligned with CSR, where the company is
monitored and managed in an effective manner for making certain that sustainability results in
value addition for the company. So from discharging duties of the board to use of powers,
everything is properly recorded and done as per the standards of corporate governance (Puma,
2016a).

PUMA
(Source: 2017d)
The company has taken numerous steps towards the environment, where it has worked towards
improving energy and water efficiency, waste management, climate change, zero discharge of
hazardous chemicals and chemicals management. A leading step in this regard by the company is
setting up solar modules in the front window of the Puma store located in Herzongenaurach as a
step towards using renewable energy (Puma, 2017e).

PUMA
(Source: Puma, 2017e)
The company relies on quantitative metrics to capture the performance of the company in terms
of its CSR performance (Anderson, 2011). And in this lies the shortfalls of Puma. The company
is so focused on numbers that it does not focus on the social aspects in its theme. The above
mentioned activities of the company do show the work which the company carries on towards
the issues of sustainability, CSR, corporate governance, where each of these have components of
benefits to society and environment, it does not take any specific steps in improving the life of
such individuals who do not form a part of the stakeholders of the company. The biggest group
in this regard are the people belonging to poor background. Instead of working towards
improving their lives, the company has face wrath owing to the incidents of poor work

PUMA
conditions (China Labor Watch, 2008). To make the matters worse, the company has also been
accused of child labour which shows the utter disregard towards the human component of society
(Fischer, 2016).
Ethical Perspective
When it comes to the ethical perspective for Puma, the company adopts Code of Ethics, which
has to be followed across the organization irrespective of the nation in which it operates. The
Code of Ethics, which were introduced back in 2005 have to be properly followed, which shows
the commitment of the company to ethics and towards responsible corporate and ethical
behaviour, which has to be complied by all the employees, business partners and affiliated
brands of the company. In case any employee comes across a situation or has a doubt regarding
the breach of the ethical standards of the company, they are required to raise their voice on a toll
free hotline for whistleblowers, which works globally (Puma 2017f).
The Code of Ethics, as stated earlier, is the basic framework which regulates the behaviour of the
suppliers, employees and customers of the company. This code sets out basic principles of the
company in key areas and basically works towards raising awareness. A key part of the code of
ethics of Puma is on issue of antitrust where the company focuses on making contributions
towards fair competition and avoiding any such behaviour where the antitrust laws are breached.
Puma has a strict policy about accepting gifts and hospitality, and also about accepting the same.
The code of ethics also covers the topics like insider information, data protection and data
confidentiality, a proper code of conduct speaking about regarding contraventions and about
seeking assistance in cases of possible violation of ethical code of the company (Puma, 2014).

PUMA
Despite such high ethical standards, the company has been accused of being unethical and in
indulging in unethical conduct. Child labour is something which is deemed as a major unethical
issue and should not take place anywhere in the world. Yet, Puma has been associated with child
labour allegations. This is in addition to the workers being made to work in bad conditions. Some
workers have stated about being provided bad working environment at Puma. Apart from this,
the Clever Little Bag, which was launched by the company a few years back, was overshadowed
by violations of human rights (Marati, 2012). In January 2011, the El Salvador producer of Puma
came under fire when the working conditions included 60 plus hour shifts (The Local, 2011).
In April 2011, at Huey Chuen factory in Phnom Penh, 101 Cambodian garment workers were
reported to have been unconsciousness owing to prolonged working hours, in addition to poor
health and safety. Just a few months before that in Phnom Penh, a woman was shot during the
labour protests, for asking for higher pay and better working conditions (Reuters, 2012). During
March 2012, an independent study revealed the poor working conditions in Bangladeshi factors
where apparels for Puma were being produced (Kaur, 2016). Had there been isolated incidents,
these could have been ignored. But the repetition of such incidents puts a question mark over the
real ethics being followed by Puma.
The actions undertaken by Puma flout the different ethical theories. Utilitarianism denotes that
such actions are correct, which result in maximization of utility of an action. So, an act is ethical
when it makes the majority happy (Albee, 2014). However, the poor working conditions making
the workers unhappy is an unethical task, as it also results in a breach of human rights, which
makes the human right activists unhappy. The virtue ethics require the companies to work in a
manner which shows different virtues like that of justice, honesty and integrity. So, when the
actions are such where virtues are shown, they would be ethical (Hooft, 2014). The acts of Puma

PUMA
highlighted above have no aspect of virtue. In addition to this, they are just opposite to virtues
which are required for an act to be ethical. Coming to another ethical theory which is
deontological theory, organizations are required to fulfil their obligations and duties when
making decisions (Ferrell and Fraedrich, 2015). Puma here failed to fulfil its human rights
obligations, in addition to those associated with work, health and safety, making it an unethical
company. A Kantian view would require the companies to treat people as an end, instead of
being means to an end (Beiser, 2014). Puma did not follow the Kantian view as it treated the
labour force as simply means to an end.
Emphasis on Triple Bottom Line
Triple bottom line is a concept which is born from the theory of CSR and was given in 1994 by
John Elkington. It is based on the focus of the organizations on three aspects, i.e., people, planet
and profit, in terms of social, environmental and financial obligations of a company (Savitz,
2013). This concept denotes that the companies have to carry work with the objective of earning
profits, working towards the environment and betterment of the people. Through this concept,
the focus is laid on the financial bottom line of the company, where the environmental and social
responsibilities are included. Hence, the triple bottom line helps in measuring the degree of a
company towards its environmental impact, economic value and social responsibility (Henriques
and Richardson, 2013).
The previous parts have highlighted that Puma, as an organization, has been focused on working
towards its triple bottom line. In this regard, the company takes different environmental
initiatives, has worked towards people by being an ethical company, and at the same time
continues to work on it being a profit making entity. However, there have been instances where

PUMA
the company had the face the wrath of different stakeholders owing to its unethical conduct in
context of its labour force. This is one of the reasons why Puma emphasizes upon working
towards triple bottom line.
By adhering to triple bottom line, the company would work towards improving its image before
the different stakeholders, by showing itself as a compliant company. Triple bottom line model
helps in sharing the agenda of CSR (McWilliams and Parhankangas, 2016). And by engaging in
activities under triple bottom line, Puma is working in line of damage control. However, the sole
purpose of the company is not towards improving its image. The company does genuinely work
towards CSR related activities and this can be proved from the award which its group company
got back in 2014 for its CSR activities. It also helps the company in reducing legal risks and risks
to its brand reputation, in addition to increasing efficiency and goodwill (Beute, 2017).
Conclusion and Recommendations
The discussion covered in the previous segments highlighted the governance and ethical aspects
of Puma. The organizational culture as its very basics, in addition to the one followed by Puma
was discussed at the very beginning of this discussion. This was followed by critical analysis of
the CSR and ethical activities of Puma. This analysis revealed that even though the company has
taken a lot of steps towards these issues, it has faced problems in the past due to its unethical
labour issues in China and Bangladesh. This has resulted in the company’s image being affected
and creating uncertainties for the stakeholders of the company. However, to overcome these
issues, the company has initiated its emphasis on triple bottom line, which not only allows the
company to work for society and towards the planet, but also towards the profits of the company.

PUMA
On the basis of this, certain recommendations can be drawn for Puma, for its future, in context of
its governance and ethical perspectives. The company needs to ensure that the incidents which
took place in Bangladesh and China, regarding the poor working conditions and the child labour
involvement are not repeated. Also, the company should, as a recuperating measure, should work
on education and rehabilitation of the workers affected in the incidents which took place. This
would serve dual purpose where not only damage control would be done, but also the company
would be working towards improving the society. In addition to this, the company needs to re-
evaluate its current processes across the globe to check if such instances are occurring in other
associated entities of the company. Even though this is a tough task to do, but it would ensure
that the company is truly ethical and also makes its associated companies in being ethical.

PUMA
References
Albee, E. (2014) A history of English utilitarianism. Oxon: Routledge.
Anderson, R. (2011) Puma first to publish environmental impact costs. [Online] BBC News.
Available from: http://www.bbc.com/news/business-13410397 [Accessed on: 15/11/17]
Beiser, F. C. (2014) The Genesis of Neo-Kantianism, 1796-1880. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Beute, E. (2017) The Origin and Benefits of Triple Bottom Line Business Thinking. [Online]
Goal Zero Recycling. Available from: https://goalzerorecycling.com/triple-bottom-line-business-
thinking-origin-benefits/ [Accessed on: 15/11/17]
China Labor Watch. (2008) Puma’s Failure in CSR: Supplier’s Critical Conditions. [Online]
China Labor Watch. Available from: http://www.chinalaborwatch.org/report/21 [Accessed on:
15/11/17]
Chonko, L. (2012) Ethical Theories. [Online] EcoSalon. Available from:
http://www.dsef.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/EthicalTheories.pdf [Accessed on: 15/11/17]
Crane, A. (2008) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Crowther, D. (2008) Corporate Social Responsibility. London: Bookboon.
Dima, J. (2016) Comparative Perspectives on Global Corporate Social Responsibility. Hershey,
PA: IGI Global.

PUMA
Ferrell, O. C., and Fraedrich, J. (2015) Business ethics: Ethical decision making & cases.
Scarborough: Nelson Education.
Fischer, M. (2016) 20 huge fashion brands got graded for slave labor. [Online] Revelist.
Available from: http://www.revelist.com/style-news/fashion-brands-slave-labor/6190 [Accessed
on: 15/11/17]
Fukuyama, F. (2013) What is governance?. Governance, 26(3), pp. 347-368.
Gomez, A.M.D., and Crowther, D. (2012) Human Dignity and Managerial Responsibility:
Diversity, Rights, and Sustainability. Surrey, England: Gower Publishing Ltd.
Grindle, M. S. (2004) Good enough governance: poverty reduction and reform in developing
countries. Governance, 17(4), pp. 525-548.
Henriques, A., and Richardson, J. (Eds.). (2013) The triple bottom line: Does it all add up. Oxon:
Routledge.
Hooft, S.V. (2014) Understanding virtue ethics. Oxon: Routledge.
Huhtala, M., Feldt, T., Hyvönen, K., and Mauno, S. (2013) Ethical organisational culture as a
context for managers’ personal work goals. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 265-282.
Kaur, H. (2016) Low wages, unsafe conditions and harassment: fashion must do more to protect
female workers. [Online] The Guardian. Available from:
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2016/mar/08/fashion-industry-protect-
women-unsafe-low-wages-harassment [Accessed on: 15/11/17]

PUMA
Mallin, C.A. (2009) Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study Approach. Northampton,
MA: Edward Elgar.
Marati, J. (2012) Behind the Label: PUMA’s Vision and Clever Little Bag. [Online] EcoSalon.
Available from: http://ecosalon.com/behind-the-label-pumas-vision-and-clever-little-bag/
[Accessed on: 15/11/17]
McWilliams, A., Parhankangas, A., Coupet, J., Welch, E., and Barnum, D. T. (2016) Strategic
decision making for the triple bottom line. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(3), 193-
204.
Needle, D. (2004) Business in Context: An Introduction to Business and Its Environment. 4th ed.
London: Thomson Learning.
Puma Energy. (2014) Puma Wins Corporate Social Responsibility Award. [Online] Puma
Energy. Available from: https://www.pumaenergy.com/press-releases/2014/03/20/puma-wins-
award-for-corporate-social-responsibility/ [Accessed on: 15/11/17]
Puma Energy. (2017a) Culture and Values. [Online] Puma Energy. Available from:
http://www.pumaenergy.com.au/about-puma-energy/culture-and-values/ [Accessed on:
15/11/17]
Puma Energy. (2017b) Corporate governance. [Online] Puma Energy. Available from:
https://www.pumaenergy.com/en/about-us/corporate-governance/ [Accessed on: 15/11/17]
Puma. (2014) Code of Ethics. [Online] Puma. Available from:
http://about.puma.com/damfiles/default/sustainability/standards/code-of-ethics/PUMA-Group-
Code-of-Ethics-aca47c81df24c3e4d80003e92d3b27f0.pdf [Accessed on: 15/11/17]

PUMA
Puma. (2016a) Annual Report. [Online] Puma. Available from:
http://about.puma.com/damfiles/default/investor-relations/financial-reports/en/2016/
PUMAGB2016_ENG.pdf-673bac0f7eca51a56224ec04770ae869.pdf [Accessed on: 15/11/17]
Puma. (2017a) Puma as an Employer. [Online] Puma. Available from:
http://about.puma.com/en/careers/puma-as-an-employer [Accessed on: 15/11/17]
Puma. (2017c) Corporate Governance. [Online] Puma. Available from:
http://about.puma.com/en/investor-relations/corporate-governance [Accessed on: 15/11/17]
Puma. (2017d) Sustainability. [Online] Puma. Available from:
http://about.puma.com/en/sustainability/ [Accessed on: 15/11/17]
Puma. (2017e) Environment. [Online] Puma. Available from:
http://about.puma.com/en/sustainability/environment [Accessed on: 15/11/17]
Puma. (2017f) Code of Ethics. [Online] Puma. Available from:
http://about.puma.com/en/sustainability/standards/coe [Accessed on: 15/11/17]
Ravasi, D., and Schultz, M. (2006) Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the
role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), pp. 433–458.
doi:10.5465/amj.2006.21794663
Reuters. (2012) Puma officials go to Cambodia after factory shooting. [Online] Reuters.
Available from: http://www.reuters.com/article/puma-cambodia/puma-officials-go-to-cambodia-
after-factory-shooting-idUSL5E8DN8S820120223 [Accessed on: 15/11/17]

PUMA
Rosauer, B.L. (2015) Three Bell Curves: Business Culture Decoded. [Online] Three Bell Curves.
Available from: http://www.threebellcurves.com/THREEBELLCURVESCust1st41415.pdf
[Accessed on: 15/11/17]
Savitz, A. (2013) The triple bottom line: how today's best-run companies are achieving
economic, social and environmental success-and how you can too. West Sussex: John Wiley &
Sons.
Smith, J.D. (2008) Normative Theory and Business Ethics. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield
Publishers.
Sprinkle, G.B., and Maines, L.A. (2010) The benefits and costs of corporate social responsibility.
Business Horizons, 53, pp. 445-453.
The Local. (2011) Sweatshop claims hit Adidas and Puma. [Online] The Local. Available from:
https://www.thelocal.de/20110129/32743 [Accessed on: 15/11/17]
Zhao, J. (2014) Corporate Social Responsibility in Contemporary China. Northampton, MA:
Edward Elgar.