Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Comparison of Phenomenological and Grounded Theory Approaches

Qualitative Methods

INTRODUCTION
The Qualitative methods plays within psychology are highly effective, where collection
of detailed data and usage of non-statistical analysis is used for improving further research
aspects. The qualitative methods in psychology enable to get detailed about patient conditions,
where specific changes can be further developed by healthcare experts. The essay will shed light
on differences between qualitative approaches to psychology, where qualitative methodologies
will be focused on. Research in essay will develop fundamental findings on qualitative
methodologies such as phenomenological, grounded theory and narrative aspects. Analysis based
on comparison between theories will enable to get detailed results about qualitative
methodologies impact and their functional usage in psychology.
Main Body
Analysis of qualitative methodologies and theories within psychology plays strong role
for strengthening treatments advancement in psychology. It can be also analysed that aspects of
qualitative methodologies can be understood with critical comparison of their practical
implementation by healthcare experts. Comparison between various qualitative approaches in
psychology can be done on the basis of their practical implementation (Tafreshi, 2020).
There are various qualitative approaches to psychology which will enable to identify
specific aspects connected to practical implementation of theories. The major factors within
comparison of qualitative methodologies can be analysed, by further segmenting various
qualitative working approach. Phenomenological qualitative methodology focuses on fact that
commonality of lived experiences within particular group, enhances abilities to arrive at
description of particular phenomenon (Williams and Smith, 2020).
It is qualitative research approach which signifies specifics are within working expertise,
for attaining desired results within treatments by psychologists. Phenomenology is a form of
qualitative research, focusing on study of an individual's lived experiences based on specific
preferences. Although it is a powerful approach for inquiry, the nature of this methodology is
often sensitive for patients.
The phenomenology approach enables to get detailed information regarding particular
emotions, responses in varied situations which varies from time to time activities. This theory of
qualitative methodology synchronizes findings in uniform manner for gaining effective results. It

enables to get direct information, with appropriate format based on optimum working goals.
Phenomenological qualitative methodology addresses specific facts in therapies correlated
towards individual preferences where approach holds huge working accuracy. Qualitative
approach holds huge specific working practical importance, for technical working optimized
developed treatments delivery. This has been also found to be significantly crucial, for gaining
innovation specific findings evolved on, for more growth in conductive pace by psychologist s
(Tafreshi, 2020).
Another theory in psychology grounded theory refers to a set of systematic analysis of
unstructured qualitative data, that specifies observed phenomena under specific situation. It is
flexible for psychologist to implement this theory, where it is focused on abstract findings to be
recorded as per key parameters based on conceptual theories that empirically plays strong role.
Practical implementation of new grounded theory in psychology where involvement in data
collection and analysis, is done by researcher where typically it observes entity of interest. A
researcher typically observes the entity of interest in a natural setting within this theory, which
basically signifies wider development in systematic manner. Comparison of both theories
signifies that usage of grounded theory is more practical and flexible to be implemented. The
phenomenological qualitative methodology lacks method to be flexible, where crux within
research results cannot be implemented accurately due to functional complicated procedure.
Researcher in using grounded theory aims to avoid making assumptions, instead adopt
more neutral aspects of human actions in social context ways which further makes research
authentic on wider domains. Grounded theory specifies repetitive themes by reviewing data,
coding emergent themes and grouping codes into concepts hierarchically which when compared
with phenomenological qualitative methodology is less effective.
It is however time-consuming, difficult to analyse and also has chance for researcher
induced bias where presentation of research findings in grounded theory aspects within longer
time period. Comparison of this theory, with Phenomenological qualitative methodology
signifies those specific measures need to be further evolved and improved. As comparison is
significantly focused on gaining functional innovation, the grounded theory of psycholgy
methodology holds huge focus for gaining new strengthened targets. It holds huge scope for
gaining analysis done in more systematic format, and presented in detailed accurate format