1 Executive Summary Thisreportispreparedinordertoevaluatethelegalaspectsofinternational businesses and understand how these factors affect their operations. The case of Alibaba Group is selected in this report, and the industry, headquarters location and the number of employees is evaluated in this report. The legislative regulatory framework which includes a range of statutes and policies which are implemented on the operations of Alibaba is analysed in this report. Different treaties, conventions and agreements that provide policies that are imposed on the company and their impact on services of the company is also identified in this report.
2 Contents Introduction of Alibaba..................................................................................................3 Legislative Regulatory Framework...............................................................................4 Treaties, Conventions and Agreements.......................................................................7 References.................................................................................................................10
3 Introduction of Alibaba Alibaba Group Holding Limited is a Chinese multinational conglomerate that was founded in 1999. The company offers its services in different industries such as e- commerce, retail, internet and technology (Alibaba Group, 2019). The IPO (initial public offering) of the company was the world’s highest in the history in which the company was valued US$25 billion in 2014 (Picker and Chen, 2014). The location of itsglobalheadquartersisinYuhangDistrict,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,China.The services of the company are available worldwide and to manage them, the enterprise has hired more than 101,550 as of 2018 (Craft, 2019). The company is a major competitor of Amazon in the Asian market, and it is rapidly diversifying its offering by launching new products and services such as WeChat. The services of the company are available for Australian consumers as well. The details regarding the number of employees that are hired by the company is not disclosed by the organisation (Alibaba Group, 2019).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4 Legislative Regulatory Framework Alibaba Group offers its services in many countries due to which the company is obligated to comply with their legal provisions to make sure that it did not violate any laws that could impose a penalty on the organisation. The company has to make surethatitassessesthekeypolicieswhichapplyonitsoperationswhileit discharges its duties in Australia since these duties are imposed on them by the government (Bottomley, 2016). The provisions are enacted and enforced through a number of regulators with the objective to make sure that these organisations did not engage in any practices or activities which are considered as illegal or unethical since they can harm the interest of citizens, communities, and other parties in Australia. a.Spam Act 2003. Since Alibaba offers its services through online medium, the company is obligated to comply with provisions which are implemented by the Australian government to protect those users that use these services. Alibaba sends notifications regarding new products to its customers in order to increase its sales and increase awareness regarding these products; however, it is prohibited from sending spam messages to its users without their prior consent under the Spam Act (Adrian, 2013). Under this Act, three key steps are given which are necessary to be followed by Alibaba when it sends spam emails to its customers. The first step is the collection of the consent of the users which must be express or inferred consent. The second step is identifying whichrequiresthatthemessagesmustcontainclear,accurateandconcise information regarding its business or products (Adrian, 2013). The third step is that all its messages must contain unsubscribe button which must be easily accessible for users. The requests made for unsubscribing should be responded in a prompt manner. b.Privacy Act 1988. While offering its online services to users, Alibaba collects their private data in order to serve them relevant advertisements according to their preferences, and it also uses such data to improve its services. However, the Privacy Act imposes a number
5 of obligations on the company to make sure that it complies with standards, rights andobligationsregardingholding,collection,useandcorrectionofprivate information about its users (Randall et al., 2014). Under section 14 of this Act, a number of privacy rights are given for companies such as Alibaba which are called theInformationPrivacyPrinciples(Randalletal.,2014).Theseprinciplesare necessary to be followed by Alibaba in order to make sure that it did not violate the privacy of its users and it also restricts the company from using their information to gain an unfair advantage. c.Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth). The online e-commerce organisations are subject to the competition and consumer laws which are implemented by the government. Alibaba is subject these guidelines as well to makes sure that its customers receive appropriate products or else it could facelegalpenaltiesoreventerminationofitsoperations(Scollo,Baylyand Wakefield, 2015). Alibaba is also obligated to make sure that it did not issue any offers or form contracts that are considered as illegal or invalid based on the fact that they limit or restrict competition in the industry. Schedule 2 also provides provisions regarding the protection of consumers to make sure that Alibaba did not violate their rights (Scollo, Bayly and Wakefield, 2015). For example, various consumer guarantees are given to customers under this Act which is necessary to be maintained by Alibaba to make sure that it did not violate their rights. For example, it has to make sure that the quality of the products is acceptable and safe and they must match the sample and demonstration model. Thus, Alibaba cannot show something on its websites and include specific details regarding its products and not provide the same product to its customer. d.Taxation Laws. Although the revenue of Alibaba is transferred to the account of the company; however, the company is obligated to pay the taxes which are imposed on by the AustraliangovernmentsinceitgeneratesprofitsfromAustraliancitizens.The company has to make sure that assess different taxes and duties which are provided by the government and which apply to its operations to make sure that it is able to avoid legal penalties. The corporation is obligated to make sure that it pays the
6 corporate tax in the country and the rate of this tax is currently set at 30 per cent by the government (ATO, 2018). This payment creates a mandatory obligation on the company to make sure that it did not face legal penalties. The Goods and Services Tax (GST) is also implemented on the organisation since it offers its services to the organisation. This tax is paid by the company at the rate of 10 per cent on the services which it offers to its customers (ATO, 2018).
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7 Treaties, Conventions and Agreements Alibaba is a multinational corporation due to which the company is subject to the guidelines and provisions which are implemented by countries. These provisions are introducedundertreaties,conventionsandagreements,andtheyresultedin imposing mandatory obligations of multinational companies since they are obligated to comply with these guidelines (Castle, 2018). These are used as mediums by the governments to make sure that they build new trading relations with nations that resulted in increasing the flow of foreign capital in the market and unemployment opportunitieswhichiscrucialforthegrowthofthecountry.Theservices and products which are offered by Alibaba are also affected based on the provisions which are implemented through these policies. 1)China Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA). Alibaba is a Chinese corporation, and the treaties which are formed between the company’s home country and other nations affect its operations. ChAFTA is a good example that is a major free trade agreement formed between the two developed nations with an objective to promote trading practices. Through these policies, the government wanted to make sure that companies in both nations did not face difficultieswhentheyexpandtheiroperationsinanothermarket.Thisgoalis achieved by these countries by removing strict guidelines and frameworks which are otherwise imposed on organisations when they expand their operations in these marketsbygivingthemrelaxationsinlegalcompliances(Dickson-Smithand Mercurio, 2018). Along with the implementation of these policies, the governments have also lowered the rate of taxes and duties which are imposed on corporations that resulted in reducing their overall profits and making international expansion an unprofitable option for them. The benefit of this treaty is received by Alibaba, and it also affects the products and services of the company. For example, the company is able to bypass many of the legal compliances which adversely affect its operations by reducing its efficiency (Dickson-Smith and Mercurio, 2018). The company also find it easier to offer its e-commerce services to customers and contract local distributors byremovaloflegalcomplianceswhichimprovesavailabilityandqualityofits
8 services. Due to the reduction of taxes and duties, Alibaba is able to make sure that its products and services are received at affordable prices to its customers. 2)AustraliaNewZealandCloserEconomicRelationsTradeAgreement (ANZCERTA). The positive trading relations between countries in which Alibaba offers its services benefit the company by making it easier for the organisation to reach out to a large number of customers. ANZCERTA is a good example which is a treaty formed between Australia and New Zealand to support the economic growth of both nations by ensuring that companies are able to easily expand their operations in both nations (Castle, 2018). Since Alibaba operates in Australia, the company is able to rely on this treaty to make sure that it offers its services in New Zealand as well. The transportation channels which are used by Alibaba in Australia also assists the company when it expands its operations its New Zealand. There is relatively less legal compliance which is imposed on Alibaba when it conducts its operation in both nations due to positive trading relation making it easier for the organisation to offer high-quality services to customers. 3)ASEAN Australia New Zealand (AANZFTA). This is another treaty that is formed between these two nations that benefit Alibaba. The purpose of this treaty is to make sure that free trade areas are situated in both nations which can be used by companies when they offer their products and services to customers in both nations. The government has implemented policies for the removal of legal compliances and taxes on companies that operates in those areas (Okamoto, 2014). The logistics and distribution network of Alibaba relies on these free trade areas to make sure that they efficiently deliver its products without facing strict compliances and payment of duties or taxes. It improves the services of the company by making it easier for its customers to reach their products as early as possible. 4)Australia-China Double Taxation Agreement. This is a major tax treaty that is formed between both nations with the objective to eliminate the issue of double taxation which creates obstacles for multinational companies such as Alibaba. Without the availability of this treaty, the revenue
9 generated by Alibaba in Australia is taxed in the country of origin and its home country as well which resulted in reducing the profitability of the enterprise (Chinatax, 2019). However, this treaty has addressed this issue by making sure that companies are not subject to double tax which encourages them to expand their operations in these nations (Chinatax, 2019). Alibaba did not have to pay the double tax that affects its services since the company did not have to increase the delivery charges which it imposed on its customers when they purchase products through its website which resulted in increasing the customer base for the company and increase the popularity of its services.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10 References Adrian,A.(2013)Howmuchprivacydocloudsprovide?AnAustralian perspective.Computer Law & Security Review,29(1), pp.48-57. AlibabaGroup.(2019).CompanyOverview.[Online]Availablefrom: https://www.alibabagroup.com/en/about/overview [Accessed on 10/05/2019]. ATO.(2018).Companytaxrates.[Online]Availablefrom: https://www.ato.gov.au/Rates/Company-tax/ [Accessed on 10/05/2019]. Bottomley,S.(2016)Theconstitutionalcorporation:Rethinkingcorporate governance. Abingdon: Routledge. Castle,M.(2018)Embeddingregionalactorsinsocialandhistoricalcontext: Australia-NewZealandintegrationandAsian-Pacificregionalism.Reviewof International Studies,44(1), pp.151-173. Chinatax. (2019).Agreement between the Government of the People’s Republic of ChinaandtheGovernmentofAustralia.[PDF]Availablefrom: http://www.chinatax.gov.cn/n810341/n810770/c1152993/part/1152995.pdf [Accessed on 10/05/2019]. Craft. (2019).Alibaba.[Online] Available from:https://craft.co/alibaba [Accessed on 10/05/2019]. Dickson-Smith, K.D. and Mercurio, B. (2018) Australia's Position on Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Fruit of a Poisonous Tree or a Few Rotten Apples.Sydney L. Rev.,40, p.213. Okamoto, J. (2014) The Australia-ASEAN Dialogue. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Picker, L. and Chen, L.Y. (2014).Alibaba’s Banks Boost IPO Size to Record of $25 Billion. [Online] Available from: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-09- 22/alibaba-s-banks-said-to-increase-ipo-size-to-record-25-billion[Accessedon 10/05/2019].
11 Randall, S.M., Ferrante, A.M., Boyd, J.H., Bauer, J.K. and Semmens, J.B. (2014) Privacy-preserving record linkage on large real world datasets.Journal of biomedical informatics,50, pp.205-212. Scollo, M., Bayly, M. and Wakefield, M. (2015) Availability of illicit tobacco in small retail outlets before and after the implementation of Australian plain packaging legislation.Tobacco control,24(e1), pp.e45-e51.