Recognition of Accented British English Speech by Non-Native

Recognition of Accented British English Speech by Non-Native Listeners
According to D’Arcy and Russell (2008), variability can be accorded as the primary source of
problem with systems designed for speech recognition. Although the individualistic way of speaking
has a strong influence on the use of a language; however, the geographical location and history of a
person also have an impact on the speaking. The Accents of the British Isles (ABI) speech corpus
consists of over 90 hours of speech wherein about 280 speakers have given their voice from 14
different locations in Britain and Ireland. The authors have used the ABI speech corpus to understand
the implication of variability on the speech recognition software and its performance. Vowels and
phonetics are accounted as the primary factor that influence the speech delivery in any language
today. The researchers have also concluded that the speaking of 11 syllables in the English language
tend to distinguish one speaker’s accent from the other. Conclusions drawn from the research claim
that the variation in spoken English is definitely recognized by a non-native listener given the history
and the geographical location’s influence. Furthermore, it was observed that the ABI has a broad
group of speakers who belong to different locations in Britain. Even then the traces of the accent can
be easily identified.
Hanani, Russell and Carey (2012), concluded that the regional accent recognition can also be
done with British English Speakers due to the presence of a certain type of words that are included in
the speech. The authors also agreed to the paralinguistic features and their impact on the accent of an
individual. The social background of a speaker was also determined to be a pressing force in the
speech of a British English Speaker. The researchers concluded that the non-native or native listeners
can also recognize the accuracy of the background of a British English speaker even without any
experience in identification of the speech. It is claimed that the new technological advancements are
still far away in pointing out the origin of a person based on their accent. The speech technology can
only be 90% accurate in giving the right outputs. Thus, natural British English should be accounted
for paralinguistic tasks rather than making an attempt to also identify the dialect spoken.

D’Arcy, Russell, Browning and Tomlinson (2004) further claim that there exist certain
inconsistencies with the ABI. The recorders of the accents of different people from a selected region
did not account the need for preserving the authenticity of the speaker. Many speakers were notably
given a pre-written text that supposed to be spoken and hence they were unable to include dialect-
based words or speech characteristics. Furthermore, for a speaker to showcase authenticity in speech
and reflect a particular dialect of British English, he/she should have lived all their lives in a
particular region. In the ABI, it was identified that these factors were not taken into account. Thus,
inconsistencies in the corpus were identified and listed to have a strong impact on the results
achieved. It was concluded that the non-native listeners can still recognize the British English
speaker from the accent due to the tone of the voice, speech delivery technique and with the use of
certain words specifically.
Through the research carried out by Najafan, DeMarco, Cox and Russell (2014), it was learnt
that the AIB has several inconsistencies in identifying the right accent of the speakers. On the other
hand, it has helped in determining that speaker adaptation unsupervised under AID cannot offer
reliable results. The focus of regional accent can be adopted to improve the performance of speech
control systems. The AID based model is also concluded to be effective with new technological
advancements in speech recording and sharing. Same methods are supposed to be applied to the
speech systems to achieve the same results. The authors have applied several techniques to determine
the usability and reliability of the AID. They recognize the errors in the AID system but it was learnt
that other models can be adopted to comfort the errors that were recorded by the same. Apart from
this, unsupervised speaker adaptability tends to showcase higher results than adaptation data. The
authors find the need to attempt new models to recognize the right phonetics to point out the
exactness of the differences in the British English dialects.
The latest systems and technologies can easily recognize the accent of British English. Non-
native speakers can comprehend the accented British English through the use of vowels and the