Accuracy of Non Contrast Spiral Computerized Tomography

Added on - 13 Sep 2019

  • Dissertation

    type

  • 6

    pages

  • 2500

    words

  • 54

    views

  • 0

    downloads

Showing pages 1 to 3 of 6 pages
Reference List:Adwan, A., & Binsaleh, S. (2015). The accuracy of noncontrast spiral computerizedtomography in detecting lucent renal stones: A case report and literature review.Urology Annals, 7(1), 109-111. doi:10.4103/0974-7796.148649Ahmed, F., Zafar, A. M., Khan, N., Haider, Z., & Hammad Ather, M. (2010). A paradigmshift in imaging for renal colic – is it time to say good bye to an old trusted friend?International Journal of Surgery, 8(3), 252-256. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.005Al-Marhoon MS, Shareef O, Al-Habsi IS, Al Balushi AS, Mathew J, Venkiteswaran KP.(2013)Extracorporeal Shock-wave Lithotripsy Success Rate and Complications: InitialExperience at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital.Oman Med J. 28(4):255-259.Available fromhttp://www.omjournal.org/fultext_PDF.aspxAl Shamakhi, A. K., Barclay, L. C., Halkett, G., K ukade, G., Mundhda, D., Uppoor, R.R., & Gawai, P. (2009). CT evaluation of flank pain and suspected urolithiasis.Radiologic Technology, 81(2), 122-131.Chana, V.O., Buckleyb, O., Persaudb, T. & Torreggianib, W.C. (2009). Is the KUBradiograph redundant for investigating acute ureteric colic in the noncontrastenhanced computed tomography era?The Royal College of Radiologists.doi:10.1016/j.crad.2008.12.007Chen, T. T., Wang, C., Ferrandino, M. N., Scales, C. D., Yoshizumi, T. T., Preminger,G. M., & Lipkin, M. E. (2015). Radiation exposure during the evaluation andmanagement of nephrolithiasis.The Journal of Urology, 194(4), 878-885.doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.118Chowdhury, F.U., Kotwal, S., Raghunathan, G., Wah, T.M., Joyce, A. &Irving, H.C.(2007). Unenhanced multi-detector CT (CT KUB) in the initial imaging of suspectedacute renal colic: evaluating a new service.Clin Radiol,62, 970-977.Curhan, G. (2014). Imaging in the emergency department for suspected nephrolithiasis.The New England Journal of Medicine, 371(12), 1154-1155.doi:10.1056/NEJMe14094491
Curtis, E., & Drennan, J. (2013).Quantitative health research: Issues and methods(1sted.). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.Drake, T., Jain, N., Bryant, T., Wilson, I., & Somani, B. K. (2014). Should low-dosecomputed tomography kidneys, ureter and bladder be the new investigation of choice insuspected renal colic?: A systematic review.Indian Journal of Urology : IJU : Journal ofthe Urological Society of India, 30(2), 137-143. doi:10.4103/0970-1591.126884Dyer, J., Syratt, T., & Singh, G. (2013). Is CTKUB the gold standard in assessing flankpain with diagnostic uncertainty? A one-year review of 228 cases.Journal of ClinicalUrology, 6(2), 114-118. doi:10.1177/2051415812471453El Kheshen, A. M. M. (2012). Role of MSCT (multi-slice computed tomography) in acuteabdomen using 64-slice technology.The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and NuclearMedicine, 43(1), 41-51. doi:10.1016/j.ejrnm.2011.12.001Erbaş, G., Oktar, S., Kilicç, K., Şen, I., Budakoǧlu, I. I., & Araç, M. (2012). Unenhancedurinary CT: Value of parenchymal attenuation measurements in differentiating acute vs.chronic renal obstruction.European Journal of Radiology, 81(5), 825-829.doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.029Fontarensky, M., Alfidja, A., Perignon, R., Schoenig, A., Perrier, C., Aurélien Mulliez, A.,Guy, L. & Louis Boyer, L. (2015). Reduced Radiation Dose with Model-based IterativeReconstruction versus Standard Dose with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructionin Abdominal CT for Diagnosis of Acute Renal Colic.Radiology,276 (1): 156-166.Gervaise, A., Gervaise-Henry, C., Pernin, M., Naulet, P., Junca-Laplace, C., & Lapierre-Combes, M. (2016). How to perform low-dose computed tomography for renal colic inclinical practice.Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, 97(4), 393-400.doi:10.1016/j.diii.2015.05.013Goldstone, A. (2010). Does diagnosis change as a result of repeat renal colic computedtomography scan in patients with a history of kidney stones?Am J Emerg Med, 28(3),291-295. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2008.11.0242
Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J. & Turner, L.A. (2007) Toward a definition of mixedmethods research.Journal of Mixed Methods Research,1, 112-33.Kennish, S.J., Bhatnager, P., Wah, T.M., Bush, S. &Irving, H.C. (2008). Is the KUBradiograph redundant for investigating acute ureteric colic in the non-contrast enhancedcomputed tomography era?Clinical Radiology,63, 1131-1135.Kotwal, S., Chowdhury, F. U., Raghunathan, G., Wah, T., Irving, H. C., & Joyce, A.(2007). Unenhanced multi-detector ct for suspected acute renal colic: Setting up aservice.European Urology Supplements, 6(2), 42-42. doi:10.1016/S1569-9056(07)60079-7Krauss, T., Frauenfelder, T., Strebel, R. T., Birzele, J., Scheffel, H., Seifert, B., . . .Goerres, G. W. (2012). Unenhanced versus multiphase MDCT in patients withhematuria, flank pain, and a negative ultrasound.European Journal of Radiology, 81(3),417-422. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.054Lauritsen, J., Andersen, J. R., Nordling, J., & Thomsen, H. S. (2008). Unenhancedcomputed tomography in acute renal colic reduces cost outside radiology department.Acta Radiologica, 49(10), 1182-1186. doi:10.1080/02841850802460011Lee, H., Yang, Y., Lee, Y., Shen, J., Jang, M., Shih, P. M.& Juan, Y. (2015).Noncontrast computed tomography factors that predict the renal stone outcome aftershock wave lithotripsy.Clinical Imaging, 39(5), 845-850.doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.04.010Leveridge, M., D’Arcy, F. T., O’Kane, D., Ischia, J. J., Webb, D. R., Bolton, D. M., &Lawrentschuk, N. (2015). Renal colic: Current protocols for emergency presentations.European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 23(1), 2-7.doi:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000324Lukasiewicz, A., Bhargavan-Chatfield, M., Coombs, L., Ghita, M., Weinreb, J.,Gunabushanam, G., & Moore, C. L. (2014). Radiation dose index of renal colic protocolCT studies in the united states: A report from the american college of radiology nationalradiology data registry.Radiology, 271(2), 445-451. doi:10.1148/radiol.14131601Martin, W. E., & Bridgmon, K. D. (2012).Quantitative and statistical research methods:From hypothesis to results. First;1; ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons3
desklib-logo
You’re reading a preview
card-image

To View Complete Document

Become a Desklib Library Member.
Subscribe to our plans

Unlock This Document