This reflection discusses the experience of working on a marketing project for GEM, a non-profit organization supporting disabled children. It explores team dynamics, role assignment, and group norms.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: REFLECTION ON GEM EXPRIENCE REFLECTION ON GEM EXPERIENCE Name of Student Name of the University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
2REFLECTION ON GEM EXPERIENCE Our team decided to carry out a marketing project of growing early minds (GEM) (growingearlyminds.org.au.2019).Thecompanyisengagedincarryingoutnon-profit operations and is basically carrying out operations of supporting the disable children and early intervention for the children between the age group of 0-16 years. The company is engaged in providing occupational therapy, pathology and various other services. While carrying out the marketing project of the company, we had to first form a team of 5people. We had to work in teams because it helps in learning the skills at a faster rate. While working in teams we all learnt faster and for complex projects it is better to work in teams than working individually. While working in teams each person gets through personal development. Therefore we decide to approach the marketing process by first forming a team. Our main purpose as a group was to carry out the marketing project of the not-for-profit organizations. Therefore in order to carry out all the activities effectively the job roles was defined properly. We all knew what was expected from us and our job roles. Trust and open communication were the two main aspects that needs to be present in a group in order to be successful. While carrying out the project, there were many circumstances where the we had share a lot of information with each other because we were stuck in a problem and without proper communication solving the problems was not possible. We had faced many problems related t carrying out the marketing project for the company GEM such as creating awareness about the company to the target market such that proper treatment can be given to organization. Our team went through the four phases of Tuckman’s team development theory such as the – forming stage, storming stage, the norming stage and the performing stage. When our team was formed we went through the first stage that is the stage of introducing each other and others. In rge second stage or the storming stage, we had many conflicts due to different beliefs that w shared and in this stage we actually understood
3REFLECTION ON GEM EXPERIENCE about the working style of others members in the group due to which the conflict arose. In the third stage or the norming stage, we learnt how to solve our conflicts and build trust in each other and others. In the final stage or the performing stage, having decided our roles, our norms we started performing our activities properly. Figure 1: Tuckman’s stages of team development Source: (Natvig and Stark 2016 ) Role assignment is the process of properly understanding the skills and knowledge of the individuals in the group and finally assigning of the roles on the basis of the same (Natvig and Stark 2016). A person can occupy different roles in a group. There are basically four main types of role in a group- task roles, functional roles, maintenance roles and dysfunctional roles. Once our group was formed, the next step was to divided the task into different roles such that each
4REFLECTION ON GEM EXPERIENCE individual can contribute to achieving the objectives of the organization. Some of the tasks on which our roles were divided was-obtaining data, analyzing it, designing a model of marketing that is most suitable for the given scenario, a prototype will be designed for the same purpose and others. My role in the tam was to design the model for marketing the project and it was based on the information collected by other team members. Initially some of us felt that we had to perform too many roles because of the inability of proper performance of a few other members in the organization. In order to carry out the task roles properly it is necessary to divide the roles of individuals on the basis of various functions that the individual can perform. Some of the major functional roles of our group was the initiator who initiated the topic or gave some suggestions and others. There was an information seeker who was responsible for gathering all information necessary for the marketing project such as the information on the marketing trends and others, there was a goal setter who decided the goals for the team and discussed the same to the company properly, there was a planner whose work was to properly carry out all activities of planning in the organization and there was an evaluator to see if the company was working in accordance with the goals and if there was any gap to find that out an take corrective actions to remove the same. Besides having the functional roles there are some other roles that help in motivating others in the group such as the motivator, the mediator, the volunteer, the listener and others. These roles were also divided within the company. Unfortunately there are also some dysfunctional roles occupied by the ,members of a team that negatively affects the team such as the some members may be aggressive in nature, or too competitive, may have a withdrawing nature and others. In order to understand the concept of group dynamics, we need to understand various concepts such the roles occupied by the members, the stage in which the group is, the type of the
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
5REFLECTION ON GEM EXPERIENCE group, the size of the group, the group norms, the acceptable group behavior and the group cohesiveness. Group dynamics is the study of the attitude and the behaviors if the individuals of the groups. In understanding group dynamics, we need to understand why groups are formed and there are various theories that are based on this. In case of the marketing project of the GEM we formed a team to carry out the marketing activities effectively because it would have become to complex for one person to carry out all the activities of marketing project y himself such as advertisement, awareness, promotion and other activities. There are some of the most famous theories for understanding the donation of groups called the theory of social identity and theory of social exchange. According to Tuckman there are four main stages of ream development that all teams have t go through in order to carry out the operations. These are the forming stage, the storming stage, the norming stage and the performing stage. Group norms are the most important lemen5 of the group dynamics because these determine the behavior and attitudes of the individuals. Norms lay down the standards of behavior and then divides the behavior as acceptable or unacceptable behavior. There can be different types of groups norms such as performance norms, dressing norms, rewarding norms and others. The performance norm determines which member is expected to perform hoe much in terms of their production. Rewarding norms determines how the rewards are to be given to the members of the group. All the members of the groups have to follow the group norms on order to be a part of the group, those members who do not follow the group norms are ignored or neglected by the group. Our group also has certain group norms such as we used to meet every Saturday for discussing about the progress of the project and we had to wear formals on Saturday for the meeting. There were various other norms of the group such as related to usage of language and others. Group cohesiveness is a very important elements of the group dynamics. Cohesiveness refers to the
6REFLECTION ON GEM EXPERIENCE bond shared by the members of the groups and the desire to remain a part of the group. There are various factors that contribute to the cohesiveness of group. Since our group composed of just 5 people while carrying out the project of marketing for the growing sound minds company we had become cohesive team. Since our group was cohesive various benefits were obtained by us such that higher productivity. Coordination , support from all the members and this made overcoming all challenges easier. Figure 2: Role ambiguity and Role conflict Source: (Lê and Jarzabkowski 2015 ) Through this group experience, I have understood many new approaches of team work such as the group dynamics- it discusses about the organization team formation, the size of the team, the value and morns of the team, the stages of the team development, team cohesiveness and others. With the help of these concepts I have understood how I need to behave as a part of the group (Lê and Jarzabkowski 2015). After studying and applying the Tuckamns team development model in this case, I have understood that conflicts are a part of all the teams and it
7REFLECTION ON GEM EXPERIENCE is quite to have conflicts between the team members because different people have different style of writing and more over the resolution of the conflicts help in developing trust on each other and help in open communication. Different people have different roles in the team and it is very important to understand the same and therefore respect to same as this helps in carrying out the activities of the organizations more effectively. With the help of these concept and through proper experience I can now apply the same in case I have to work in teams in near future.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
8REFLECTION ON GEM EXPERIENCE References growingearlyminds.org.au 2019.Growing Early Minds | Early Childhood Intervention Services | Sydney.[online]GrowingEarlyMinds.Availableat:https://growingearlyminds.org.au/ [Accessed 28 May 2019]. Lê,J.K.andJarzabkowski,P.A.,2015.Theroleoftaskandprocessconflictin strategizing.British Journal of Management,26(3), pp.439-462. Natvig, D. and Stark, N.L., 2016. A project team analysis using Tuckman's model of small-group development.Journal of Nursing Education,55(12), pp.675-681.