Crown Cut Visit Experience : Report
6 Pages1098 Words49 Views
Added on 2020-07-23
Crown Cut Visit Experience : Report
Added on 2020-07-23
ShareRelated Documents
REFLECTION
Table of ContentsINTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................1Court visit information................................................................................................................2Preparing of court visit................................................................................................................2During court visit........................................................................................................................2CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................3
INTRODUCTIONReflection refers to the individual experience and inner processes of thinking and feeling.While any individual suffers from any moment and circumstances then they will defiantly learnsomething new which reflect from their personality. Reflection is a picture that individual canfind in a mirror and in the water. While any individual interface with something and face anycircumstance then they may impact from that circumstance or individual. In the present report,individual defines the experience regarding the Crown court visit where he/she has attendhearing regarding the case of R. V smith.MAIN BODYIn south African criminal law is an important case. These fight is military base. This caseis ultimate death of victim's. The issue of the case is the defendant was a solider at fight at anarmy barracks. The soldier was injured the victim taken to the medicine and the receive medicalattention we was dropped twice being carried the hospital by those carrying him. At the hospitalthe treatment given is the negligent treatment received but the medicines failed to diagnose thathis lung had been punctured. The victim injuries and the soldier died and the defendant chargedthat the murder of the soldier and appealing contending the soldier has correct medical treatmentthe soldier not have died. Victim would have survived but the defendant of the negligence ofthose treating the soldier. I saw that the attending doctor did not realize that murder of thesoldier. He is extent of injuries but the victim causing death. The defendant argued that theconfusion of the had been obtained under duress and therefore inadmissible. The issue of thenegligence the part of a doctor and capable the breaking for chain and the ultimate death thevictims. The court of this case held the stab of the cause of victim death but the death is nomatter the was not the sole causes. These facts of the case is the chain of the causation was notbroken. The court said that stabbing was still but the cause of death so that the defendant is guiltythe victim murder. The defenses claimed that in order to convict for the murder its proven thatsmith the caused of the death. The court must have satisfaction that the death was natural its nota murder of victims and solo consequence of the stabbing. In the recent time, I got anopportunity to visit the Crown court at Isleworth on Tuesday 10th April for the hearing of thecase trial titled, “R v Smith”. This helped me to gain a better idea about the preceding of legal1
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
R v Smith [1959] 2 QB 35 - Case Brief on Causation and Murderlg...
|7
|2061
|460