Reflective Report on Qualitative and Quantitative Research Approaches

Reflective Report 1
Reflective Report

Reflective Report 2
Introduction
The main aim of this paper is to highlight the approach of qualitative and quantitative data. It is
vital to focus on the published research to essential inspection, for the purpose of evaluating the
strength of the findings. The criteria for evaluation should be appropriate for the research
paradigm that is qualitative and quantitative. A qualitative approach is considered to the study of
the social world which focuses to elaborate and evaluate the behaviour and culture of humans
and their groups from the approach of those being analysed. Quantitative researchers have
leaned to sight qualitative research in the form of examining social investigations. The
conceptualizations of validity and reliability are inappropriate for the evaluation of qualitative
research as they were not planned for the same purpose. This paper will take consideration of
two different research paper on qualitative and quantitative in order to understand the concepts
and theories of both methods. There are different criteria to evaluate the qualitative and
quantitative data and it is required by the researcher to have better knowledge regarding the
same.
Understanding of the concepts and theories
The evolving nature of qualitative research that outcomes from the communication between data
analysis and data collection need that researchers do not specify the sample for data collection in
effective terms. In quantitative studies, the random sampling technique is the ideal sampling
standard. There is number of studies of qualitative that use for purposeful sampling, cognisant
selection of a small number of data sources that follow the specific criteria. The power of
focused sampling lies in determining information-rich cases for thorough evaluation to highlight
the questions of interest. This kind of sampling focuses to envelop a range of actual social event

Reflective Report 3
and views from a suitable collection of data sources. The concepts and theories of both research
approaches are entirely different that is mentioned below:
Concept of qualitative Approach
The concept of qualitative research is coming within reach of for analysing and understanding
the significance individuals or groups assigned to a social problem. The process of research
includes developing procedures and questions; an array of data is being done by the participant’s
setting and the data inductively developing from specifics to common themes. The final written
report has an effective structure. It has been found that the theory in qualitative research has a
problematic issue. In quantitative research, the research questions and hypothesis are based on
theories that the researcher want to test. In qualitative research, the theory is adapted throughout
the research process for the purpose of attempting the unconnected facts in a logical process. It
has been identified that there are five various extents of theorizing such as conceptualization,
metaphor, context-bound, differentiation and context-free grand theorizing.
Concept of quantitative Approach
The role of quantitative research is for evaluating the objective theories by evaluating the
bonding among variables. These variables can be evaluated in an effective manner, so that the
number of data can be evaluated by taking use of statistical procedures. The structure of the
quantitative report entails introduction, literature and theory, methods, outcomes and discussion.
Similarly, qualitative researchers, those who employ in this form have certain assumptions
regarding testing theories decreasingly, developing in preventions against bias, handling for
substitute elaborations, and being capable to imitate the searches.
Critical evaluation of a qualitative research paper

Reflective Report 4
For evaluating the qualitative research paper, the case study of Nursing Education in the Arab
World has been chosen that was proposed by Devadas (2016). In this paper, the critical review
was to elaborate on the qualitative studies completed on innovative nursing curriculums for the
aim of determining which qualitative method have been suitable for analysing the effectiveness
of the curriculum. In the context of the data sources, the main focus of the researcher is on 25
studies from main countries in the world were analyzed. In order to review the article, the
theoretical frameworks are useful to collect the data. With respect to the discussion, the use of
phenomenology in its common way has been used in this paper. Along with that to analyse the
qualitative research, the researcher has used grounded theory and this was effective as the
experience of an innovative nursing prospectus in the region of Arab that commences in its
infancy. This paper has used the most common data collection tool such as semi-structured
interviews and focus group interviews. It has been critically reviewed that this paper has used
qualitative research designs that are mentioned below.
For this research paper, descriptive phenomenology is suitable design of the investigation if there
is modest literature on the phenomenon of interest. Devadas (2016), shows that descriptive
phenomenological studies entail intuiting, bracketing, describing and analyzing. It has been
found in the paper that all of the 14 studies investigated, Devadas (2016), demonstrate bracketing
in planning the study, on the other hand, Child and Langford (2011) and Ritchie et al. (2010)
account on a sovereign interviewer for the purpose of conducting the interviews in their studies.
Intuitiveness is not openly stated in any of the articles but this can be entailed from the
researcher in order to attain the desired objectives.
The researchers used semi-structured interviews and among 27 articles under examination, 16
were taken into consideration by the researcher to collect the data and 10 studies were entailed