Reflective Response: Examining Adani Groundwater Plan and its Approval

Verified

Added on  2023/01/23

|3
|330
|66
Report
AI Summary
This assignment presents a reflective response to a media article discussing the approval of Adani's groundwater plan. The response highlights the unreliability of the water management plan, which was based on flawed modeling and insufficient assessment of environmental impacts. The author expresses shock at the situation, emphasizing the potential harm to the environment and farmers. The response also discusses the role of political pressure and the need for further improvements, considering the implications of climate change. The author suggests that more approvals are needed from the Queensland Government to mitigate the growing climate change impacts and safeguard the environment. This analysis underscores the importance of ethical considerations and responsible environmental management in large-scale projects.
Document Page
Reflective response
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
The article is based on the decision of Melissa Price, on the approval of Adani’s ground water
plan. The article shows that the water management plan was extremely unreliable; it is the result
of the poor modelling which was full of errors and false assumptions. It is held that the used
modelling was not suitable and sufficient to reduce impacts to protected environment. This
further, underpinned the toll on bore water on which farmers depend. With more pressure from
cabinet colleagues, finally MS Price approved to the ground water management plan of Adani.
Politics also played a main role in the overall plan, it can be said that there was immense delay in
this situation, but with more criticism faced by Adani, plans were revisited (Long and Slezak,
2019). However, still large improvements are to be made in the plan, as the climate concern will
grow, its commercial viability will be in question.
My reaction to the full story is shocking; it is because the ground water related plan was
dramatically impacting the environment and the bore water on which farmers rely on. However,
the approach of Adani was so unreliable and according to him it was out of scope. According to
me, there was so much of delay, and after so much of pressure, improvements were made. In my
point of view, several granting of approvals are still required to be made from the Queensland
Government to make further improvements, otherwise the growing climatic change can have a
drastic impact.
Document Page
REFERENCES
Long, S., and Slezak, M., 2019. Inside Melissa Price's decision to approve Adani's groundwater
plan (Online). Available from <https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04-11/adani-damning-
assessment-turned-into-approval/10990288 >. [Accessed on 21 April 2019].
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 3
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]