Report on Operations in Australian Consumer Law
Added on 2020-06-06
10 Pages3312 Words60 Views
Law
|
|
|
BUSINESS LAW
Table of ContentsINTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1MAIN BODY..................................................................................................................................11. Does the transaction fall within the operations of the Australian Consumer Law..................12. Implied guarantees which argue by Roberta to breached by Plaza and Myers Stored Ltd.....13. Remedies through Roberta claim in relation to any breaches ACL........................................54. Statement of each Roberta's receipts for the purchases any legal effect and find effect.........6CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................7REFERENCES 58595.....................................................................................................................8
INTRODUCTIONBusiness law consider different rules, regulations and norms as well. All these aspectshelp to solve issues and problems of the business with includes solutions. Furthermore, it helpsto maintain business ethics and follow authentic activities in the country. Present report based onthe case of Roberta who face issues after bought goods from Plaza and Myers Stored Ltd. Inrespect to focus on the solution, report analyses transaction fall within the operations inAustralian Consumer Law. Furthermore, solution is provided with making effectiveness inrelation with contract. MAIN BODY1. Does the transaction fall within the operations of the Australian Consumer Law Yes, transaction of the present case study fall within the operations of AustralianConsumer Law. In this aspect, Roberta need to be protected through consumer rights when shebought goods and services. This is because there was no product safety. There were unfairbusiness practices so that it creates misleading and deceptive conduct which is represented asoffence. Information standards and country origin with proper labelling on the contract of law.When Roberta bought shoe, heel was broken so that it can be stated that there if no qualitativematerial has been used. Furthermore, for her mother she bought pasta maker but unfortunately,she got popcorn maker (John Gleeson, 2014). It is another mistake done by Plaza and Myersstore. Therefore, different trade practices consider towards the goods. Apart from this, shebought turntable sound for boyfriend in which needle get hurt George. Australian competitionand consumer commission determines in respect to the services. Consumer protection provision in Australian Securities and Investment commission Act2001. In relation to the financial products and services, goods and services consider differentlaws and regulations as well. Furthermore, there is different consumer protection provision inACL mirrored to follow rules and regulations as well. In relation with the final products andservices, Australian Securities and Investment commission responsible to enforcing the ASICact. 2. Implied guarantees which argue by Roberta to breached by Plaza and Myers Stored Ltd.Suppliers and manufacturer always provide some guarantees on the goods which theysold. Therefore, buyers have right to get warranty that provided by suppliers or manufacturer. In1
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Business Law and Ethics: ACL and Consumer Guaranteeslg...
|12
|2670
|71
Australian Consumer Law: Case Study Analysislg...
|12
|2670
|467
Introduction of Australian Consumer Lawlg...
|9
|2614
|180
Does Sageeta with Myers fall within the Australian Consumer Law?lg...
|10
|2398
|104
Business Law and Ethics PDFlg...
|10
|2607
|22
Breaching Provisions of Australian Consumer Law: Angelwings Airlines Caselg...
|12
|3234
|328