Strategic Procurement from Market

This assignment delves into the complexities of strategic procurement, focusing on how businesses utilize forward contracts and spot markets to acquire materials. It analyzes the interplay between these market mechanisms and overall supply chain strategy, highlighting the importance of informed decision-making in navigating fluctuating market conditions. The analysis draws upon relevant research and case studies to provide a comprehensive understanding of this crucial aspect of modern business operations.

RUNNING HEAD: Strategic Procurement
1
Strategic Procurement

Strategic Procurement 2
Executive Summary
Supply strategy may be described as long-term strategy for ensuring appropriate supply of
products and services which are basic to an organization’s capacity to cater its core company
goals. The meaning of strategic procurement refers to a whole course of action that considers the
communicated goals and necessities of the supply strategy department and of company as a
complete and then works focused to fulfill them over a period of time. This report describes and
critically evaluates a problem with the supply strategy in the Starbucks. The report also explains
the procurement life cycle model in relating to supply strategy issues identified in the strategic
procurement of Starbucks. The study also recommends a strategic plan that helps the
organization to improve its strategic procurement to become more competitive in the market.

Strategic Procurement 3
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................4
Describe and examination of issues with supply techniques in Starbucks......................................5
Higher wage payment..................................................................................................................5
Increase the prices of coffee beans..............................................................................................5
Customers Have More Choices and are increasingly more demanding......................................6
Information technology methods.................................................................................................6
Improving the complex................................................................................................................6
Single logistic method..................................................................................................................6
Gaining the company trust...........................................................................................................6
Application of Procurement life cycle model..................................................................................7
Identify needs...............................................................................................................................7
Particular requirements................................................................................................................7
Examine supplier choices.............................................................................................................8
Cost and conditions......................................................................................................................8
Purchase order..............................................................................................................................8
Delivery........................................................................................................................................8
Expediting....................................................................................................................................9
Receive and checking of Purchase...............................................................................................9
Invoice Order...............................................................................................................................9
Record maintenance.....................................................................................................................9
Strategic techniques recommended for Starbucks...........................................................................9
Build up a governing inventory network board...........................................................................9
Legitimately adjust and staff the inventory network association...............................................10
Create innovative work for customers.......................................................................................10
Build up co-operation with key providers..................................................................................10
Involvement in community vital sourcing.................................................................................11
Concentrate on add up to cost of proprietorship........................................................................11
Put contracts under the production network work.....................................................................11

Strategic Procurement 4
Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................12
References......................................................................................................................................12
Introduction
This report describes the supply strategy of Starbucks. Starbucks is a famous chain of espresso
stores built up in Seattle in 1971. Along with coffee, Starbucks provide hot and cold coffee
which can be prepared to a consumer order, for instance, the brand Frappuccino liquid
refreshment with different kinds of taste and syrups. This study describes and evaluates an issue
with the supply strategy in the Starbucks Company. The study applies a relevant model theory
such as Procurement life cycle model to reduce the problems identified in the Starbucks supply
strategy. The report also recommends strategic plans which enable Starbucks to improve its
procurement in order to become more competitive in the business. The main aim of this report is
to seek to consistently enhance procurement execution of Starbucks and ensure procurement
activities are integrated and to ensure that purchases are attempted through open and all around
competitors. The evaluation of issues in the supply strategy of Starbucks enable the business to
determine the opportunities for working with other organizations, both in public sector or private
sector, in order to generate more cost-effective, creative and sustainable procurement choices for
the business.
Describe and examination of issues with supply techniques in Starbucks.
According to Hong and Kwon (2012), Starbucks is a worldwide café situated in Seattle, the
United States of America. Starbucks is the greatest cafe organization on the world, with 20891
stores in 62 nations. The identity of Starbucks is in itself an incredibly brand which is famous as
a coffee store. It is incredibly check mindful, with a web based systems administration nearness
that traverses the world. The supply strategy of Starbucks operates and arranges multiple
international distribution centers basically with the whole control in United States, Europe and in
Asia. The supply strategy for Starbucks uses easy one simple scorecard method to examine its
supply chain viably. Starbucks assesses the security in operations, timely advancement and
demand fill rates, a sum of complete inventory and stock network price and undertaking save
stores. Starbucks see normally useful that is long term provider organization as the way to its

Strategic Procurement 5
future advancement and accomplishment. Manageability is at the focal point of Starbuck's
sourcing practices (Lee et al., 2014). Starbucks has strict supplier screening rules keeping in
mind the end goal to ensure that each provider is as per the organization's reasonable, green and
compelling approach to manage business operations. There are some issues also present in the
supply strategy of Starbucks which are described are as follows:
Higher wage payment: According to Lo and Power (2010), the increases in prices of the end
product have pushed the company due to the higher cost of raw material and work. It is battled
that an extension in the federal minimum wage will unfavorably influence the company and its
formally thin edges, especially at approved stores. Starbucks already pays compensation
significantly higher than the stipulated minimum and is prominent as worker’s decision.
Increase the prices of coffee beans: Coffee costs, after being in a slump for quite a while,
have started rising afresh. According to Qi et al. (2011), the basic contributor towards the
expansion in expenses of espresso beans is the dry season in Brazil and Vietnam, the greatest
creators of espresso beans. Further, the rise in demand for coffee has prompted a diminishment
in the stock levels of coffee for the past twelve consecutive quarters. As a result, the company
saw a spike in the cost of the commodity. Since, coffee is the major raw material used a climb in
the coffee beans costs, combined with the supply shortage, is probably going to influence
Starbucks margins adversely.
Customers Have More Choices and are increasingly more demanding:
Consumers are demanding more prominent assortments of high-quality, cost-effective items with
accessibility over numerous channels (Christopher, 2016). They are focused on comfort,
dependability, easily available, and anticipate their chosen supplier cater their demands over
different channels. There is a significant gap, however between what customer needs from the
company and the abilities Starbucks possess today, start with the less-than-streamlined supply
chain.
Information technology methods: The emerging significance of Starbucks is driving a
requirement for more adaptable, understanding technology and frameworks. Starbucks must
create new methods in order to serve their customers but are often encumbered with supply chain
not intended for these new items delivery channels (Hugos, 2011). Discrete and disconnected

Strategic Procurement 6
legitimate methods do not often lend company to seamlessly supporting the complete end-to-end
customer involvement which is an objective of Starbucks.
On the other side, there is the evaluation of the above issues in the supply strategy of Starbucks,
which enables the company to overcome this issues and challenges and perform at their best in
the market which are explained as follows (Parmigiani et al., 2011)s.
Improving the complex: The initial step of the changing arrangement is to distinguish
Starbuck's inventory network system organization and drew in taking a difficult course of action
and simplifying it with the goal that each activity could be categorized as one of the four major
production network capacities, such as design, source, make and convey. For the instance, the
significance of the past experience is the accompanying principles and directions in an essential
way. For instance, anybody drew in with intending to be it creation arranging, energizing, or new
item presented was set in the arranging gathering. Sourcing practices were assembled into two
zones that are espresso and non-espresso acquisition. According to Awaysheh and Klassen
(2010), all assembling regardless of whether done in-house or by get a creator was appointed to
the make down to sensible unit. With everything taken into account, all staff working in
transportation, scattering, and customer advantage was decided to the pass on social occasion.
After the stock system limits were redone, the diverse workplaces turned their respect for the
second focus of the generation organize change which is lessening price and enhance
effectiveness. As an important part of this attempt, the crediting pack wore down perceiving the
cost drivers that were pushing up costs. The collecting bunch built up a more suitable model for
passing on espresso seed to its preparing plants, with the objective of putting away in the zone
where the item is sold. The advantages of that approach were rapidly evidently self-evident,
regionalizing its coffee creation which enabled Starbucks to reduce its transportation expenses
and lead times (Du et al., 2012).
Single logistic method: According to Ross et al. (2015), the production of a single, general
coordination framework was fundamental for Starbucks as a result of its essential store arrange.
The company, everything considered, brings espresso beans from Latin America, Africa, and
Asia to the United States and Europe in sea compartments. Starbucks runs five close-by stream
centers in the United States, two are association had and the other three are worked by
untouchable coordination affiliations. It also has two dispersing centers in Europe and two in

Strategic Procurement 7
Asia, that is altogether overseen by Third Party Logistics. Coffee is just a lone of different things
held at these movement centers. They likewise handle differing things required by Starbucks'
retail outlet's start and end from furniture to cappuccino mix. Depend on their zones, the stores
are given by either the sweeping, neighborhood transport centers or by tinier stockrooms called
central scattering centers (Johnsen et al., 2014). Starbucks utilizes 33 such central spread
concentrations in the United States, seven in the Asia and Pacific range, in Canada five, and in
Europe three, at introduce, everything aside from one is worked by outsider coordination
organizations. The coordination group also met with its outsider coordination organizations and
investigated gainfulness and contract rates. To help the review technique, the gathering made
step by step scorecards for measuring those vendors.
Gaining company trust: According to Ivanov (2010), Starbucks begun its production chain
change effort, it has lessened costs worldwide without managing administration transport. There
is a considerable measure of certainty that company now are rotated around organization also,
quality to give what Starbucks stores require and what Starbucks unmistakable business
customer require. To manage that criticalness for development and to guarantee a future stream
of limit into the affiliation, Starbucks starting at now started an activity to enroll top graduated
class of store arrange direction programs. Alongside its enrolling program, the Company expects
to give continuous training to its present laborers to empower them to also develop their store
arrange data and aptitudes. Starbucks needs to guarantee to have thought pioneers. The mixture
of newcomers will empower Starbucks to remain concentrated on its stock framework mission of
passing on things with an unpredictable state of organization and not any more insignificant
conceivable price to its supplies in the United States and across the world (Yeh and Chuang,
2011).
Application of Procurement life cycle model
According to Dhillon (2013), procurement may be defined as the securing of products or services
from any outer sources. The procurement cycle is the whole procedure from securing to delivery
to installment. In other words, Administration in any company must esteem the specialty of
grabbing products and organizations. The procurement cycle searches for after specific activities

Strategic Procurement 8
for seeing a need or needs of the association through the last progress of the respect of the thing
or contract. Proper organization of open and corporate assets is crucial while managing this key
approach, paying little heed to whether in strong or powerless monetary markets. Following a
displayed well-ordered strategy will help organization viably finish its targets. Each organization
that works business needs to purchase materials, for instance, raw materials, organizations and so
on. The procurement cycle has pushed toward winding up some portion of the present profitable
business operation. The association can get those materials as in-house creation or outside
acquirement. The procurement cycle theory has been applied to Starbucks supply strategy which
is explained as follows (Akintoye et al., 2012):
Identify needs: According to Umeda et al. (2012), the business must aware about the new
product requirements and needs of customers. The product might be one that should be
reordered, or it might be another thing for the company. In other words, the first stage of
procurement cycle process starts when a business has a requirement for a good or service. These
products or service can be inside that is any materials required to maintain the business or
outside materials that the business will in the long run offer. This stage additionally incorporates
setting a financial plan. Starbucks must recognize the needs of customers so that they will able to
create an innovative product for the consumers and enhance their customer base.
Particular requirements: According to Nguyen (2016), the second stage of procurement
cycle is to choose the suitable product which is fundamental for the company. A couple of
ventures have measures with a specific end goal to have the recognized judgments. Part numbers
help recognize these for a couple of associations. Diverse organizations have no point of
reference. If not, at that point the business must pick the key thing by using identifiers, for
example, shading or weight. Starbucks must identify the correct requirements of the customers
and choose the particular product which fulfills the customer needs and wants (Hill et al., 2014).
Examine supplier choices: Supplier selection is the main important stage in the
procurement cycle procedure. This stage is all about sourcing potential sellers and deciding their
capacity to give the best value and quality for company products or services. While the stage
appears to be direct, it is essential to find sellers who not just convey an amazing product at an
aggressive cost, however, who have a strong reputation. Preferably, the company would

Strategic Procurement 9
manufacture a commonly gainful relationship that can keep going long term, if necessary.
Starbucks actively looking for assorted possessed organizations to buy from, and company
establishes prosperous groups. Starbucks trust their Supplier Diversity Program which has been
an awesome achievement, and the company is happy to report that the measure of business
Starbucks lead with assorted providers develops each year (Lehmann, 2012).
Cost and conditions: According to Goldsmith (2010), the business will examine
exceptionally critical information to pick the best cost and terms for the thing. This will rely
upon if the organization needs things quickly available things or particular materials. As a rule,
the business will research three suppliers in advance it settles on an extreme conclusion. The
price tag will be put forward in the Order. Unless generally given in the relevant Order, the value
put forward in the Order incorporates all appropriate charges, obligations, levies, additional
charges, and different sums assessable by any services specialist concerning the Products or
Services. The price tag may not be adjusted or changed without the earlier composed
understanding of Starbucks.
Purchase order: According to Davila et al. (2012), the purchase order is utilized the formal
contract used to purchase the item. The purchase order designs the esteem, judgments and terms
and conditions of the item or advantage and some other additional commitments. In other words,
a purchase order might be characterized a phase of acquisition cycle which is a formal
requirement to a seller to supply certain materials or administrations under the particular
conditions. A purchase order can be made with a reference or without reference to a purchaser
request, an interest for reference, or another purchase order.
Delivery: The purchase order must be conveyed, as a rule by fax, email, by and by, email or
other electronic means. According to Smith et al. (2010), there is some specific movement
procedure which is exhibited in the securing records. The beneficiary by then gets receipt of the
buy arranges. The two social events keep a copy on file. This stage of procurement cycle relates
to Starbucks as Company must comply with the additional demands regarding the delivery and
shipment of products as set forth in Starbucks the Supplier Guidance.
Expediting: Campaigns of the buy arrange addresses the convenience of the associations or
materials passed on. It winds up being especially essential if there any shot that there are any

Strategic Procurement 10
deferrals. The issues much of the time noted join allocate, advancement times and work
culmination (Chua and Banerjee, 2013).
Receive and checking of Purchase: According to Flynn et al. (2010), once the sending
organization passes on the product, the beneficiary perceives or, on the other hand rejects the
things. Association of the things gives the relationship to pay for them.
Bill of purchase Order: Three records must match when a receipt demands divide that is just
the receipt, the tolerant document and the primary buy arrange. According to Monczka et al.
(2015), the understanding of these reports gives attestation from both the beneficiary and
supplier. Any assortments must be settled before the recipient pays the bill. When in doubt,
portion is profited, check bank trades, credit letters or different sorts of electronic trades.
Documentation maintenance: Because of audits, the association must keep up original
and correct records. These consolidation purchase records to check any cost information and
purchase asking for to avow ensure information. Purchase records reference future purchases too
(Prajogo and Olhager, 2012).
Strategic techniques recommended for Starbucks
According to Tate et al. (2010), the major strategic plans which can be adopted by Starbucks in
order to improve its procurement in the business with the aim to become more competitive in the
market are explained as follows (Leung et al., 2014):
Build up a governing inventory network board: An administering chamber's
motivation is to provide guidance and enable change to stock framework strategy with the
company's general system. The leading group of trustees' participation ought to merge the
pioneers of the stock framework organization and furthermore corporate specialists,
distinguishing strength unit executives, and other persuading company leaders. In a perfect
world, the chamber should hold routinely coordinated get-togethers. In any case, paying little
notice to the probability that it doesn't, its minor closeness will exhibit that stock structure
affiliation has the endorsing and duty of senior authority. This strategic plan helps the Starbucks
to remove the barriers to achievement that are present within the company. The council also
offers a viable forum for cross-functional communication. This strategic plan gives Starbucks a

Strategic Procurement 11
dynamic overseeing committee makes an opportunity for specialty unit leaders to give the
inventory network administration authority with data in regards to future techniques and
ventures.
Legitimately adjust and staff the inventory network association: It can be hard to
manage the stock structure work in a way that will help its sufficiency and pass on proportionate
central focuses to the organization. A few affiliations are best served by embeddings equipped
stock structure association specialists in different perceiving qualities units. For others, a more
idea operation is extraordinary. An essential number of the dynamic associations we have
worked with, regardless, have understood a crossbreed approach that solidifies a joined system to
get simultaneousness with decentralized execution to overhaul benefit. This strategic plan
involves placing procurement, logistics, contract administration, and demand planning activities
to Starbucks in order to manage the supply strategy in a proper manner.
Create innovative work for customers: Ideally in-class associations, by separating,
managers understand that the system should empower them to better manage their supply chains.
They make sense of how to use development to convey favorable information without playing
out an alternate workaround to focus and see the data. They see the centrality of a persuading
purchase to-pay process and have gotten frameworks and parts to get the best great conditions
from development. Thus, this strategic plan helps Starbucks to choose the appropriate innovation
and advancement that best fulfills the procedural requirements of the supply chain of Company
and help the Company to increase its market share.
Build up co-operation with main providers: Best-in-class affiliations work by and by
with providers long after an arrangement has been settled upon. In the present situation, this is
called provider relationship alliance. Regardless, that initiates one-way correspondence that is
instigating the provider how to do it. Two-way correspondence, which requires both purchaser
and merchant to generally deal with the relationship which is also initiating by organization. A
similarly fitting term for this best practice may be affiliation together association, with pros from
the two social affairs coordinating to enhance the buyer relationship. Starbucks can adopt this
strategic plan to establish a viable alliance management plan with the major providers which
involve:

Strategic Procurement 12
Offer an element to ensure that the connections remain sound and dynamic
Make a stage for issue confirmation
Create steady change goals with the objective of achieving a motivation for the two groups
Confirm that performance objectives are achieved.
Involvement in collaborative strategy sourcing: Strategic sourcing is an establishment
of successful creation arranges organization. Regardless, a helpful imperative sourcing action
makes stunningly better results. Organization request for information and information regarding
their objectives and techniques from those clients, which may join viable regions, for instance,
account and bookkeeping, arranging, operations, support, security, prosperity and condition, and
quality verification any inside claim to fame unit or distinction point that will add to the
movement's thriving. This approach influences Starbucks to guarantee openness of game plans
and furthermore achieves chopping down aggregate cost, streamlined approaches and extended
responsiveness to customers advancing requirements.
Focus on the sum of total cost of proprietorship: Recognizing the aggregate cost of
proprietorship requires looking a whole system of getting and utilizing the thing or organizations,
something that can basically occur with speculation and commitment from both the purchaser
and the merchant. Starbucks will set up an aggregate cost of proprietorship air as an objective
that the supply alliance union needs to get a handle on and spread all through the whole venture.
This is not the basic strategy, be that as it may, to convince association's legitimate specialist to
truly sort out a motivator over cost.
Put contracts under the supply chain activities: Purchasing and obtaining groups
frequently arrange critical potential hold stores during the sourcing technique however never
totally comprehend those venture reserves. The explanations for this move, yet they regularly
consolidate a powerlessness to grant contract terms to the affected affiliations and a failure to
screen contract consistency. The main advantage of this strategic plan will help Starbucks to the
agreements are gathered and kept up in a central repository.

Strategic Procurement 13
Conclusion
From the above report, it has been concluded that supply strategy is the important tool of every
business and necessary to organization achievement and customer fulfillment. This report
describes the supply chain management of Starbucks Company. The report explains the
importance of supply strategy in Starbucks as it is a significant element in organizations
activities and a necessary component to operational viability which can be followed to consumer
fulfillment and organization’s achievements. The supply strategy of Starbucks is like the
backbone of a company which handles the difficult problems of the business organization, for
example, fast development of multinational companies, worldwide expanding and ecological
concerns which directly or indirectly influence the organization strategy. The study describes the
main issues with the supply strategy in the Starbucks which create problems in the success of the
Company. The report also evaluates the above issues and provides measures to overcome these
issues with the supply strategy of Company. The study applied the procurement cycle which is a
cyclical process of basic stages when purchasing goods or services in relating to the supply
strategy of Starbucks. These procurement cycle theories help the organization to determine the
opportunities and examine the suppliers which are dependent on sound ethical norms and
standards. The report recommends some strategic plan which Starbucks can be adopted in order
to improve its procurement process to become more competitive in the market.

Strategic Procurement 14
References
Akintoye, A., Goulding, J. and Zawdie, G. eds., 2012. Construction innovation and process
improvement. John Wiley & Sons.
Awaysheh, A. and Klassen, R.D., 2010. The impact of supply chain structure on the use of
supplier socially responsible practices. International Journal of Operations & Production
Management, 30(12), pp.1246-1268.
Christopher, M., 2016. Logistics & supply chain management. Pearson UK.
Chua, A.Y. and Banerjee, S., 2013. Customer knowledge management via social media: the
case of Starbucks. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), pp.237-249.
Davila, T., Epstein, M. and Shelton, R., 2012. Making innovation work: How to manage it,
measure it, and profit from it. FT press.
Dhillon, B., 2013. Life cycle costing: techniques, models and applications. Routledge.
Du, T.C., Lai, V.S., Cheung, W. and Cui, X., 2012. Willingness to share information in a
supply chain: A partnership-data-process perspective. Information & Management, 49(2),
pp.89-98.

Strategic Procurement 15
Flynn, B.B., Huo, B. and Zhao, X., 2010. The impact of supply chain integration on
performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of operations
management, 28(1), pp.58-71.
Goldsmith, S., 2010. The power of social innovation: How civic entrepreneurs ignite
community networks for good. John Wiley & Sons.
Hill, C.W., Jones, G.R. and Schilling, M.A., 2014. Strategic management: theory: an
integrated approach. Cengage Learning.
Hong, P. and Kwon, H.B., 2012. Emerging issues of procurement management: a review and
prospect. International Journal of Procurement Management 4, 5(4), pp.452-469.
Hugos, M.H., 2011. Essentials of supply chain management (Vol. 62). John Wiley & Sons.
Ivanov, D., 2010. An adaptive framework for aligning (re) planning decisions on supply
chain strategy, design, tactics, and operations. International journal of production
research, 48(13), pp.3999-4017.
Johnsen, T., Howard, M. and Miemczyk, J., 2014. Purchasing and supply chain
management: A sustainability perspective. Routledge.
Lee, C.K.M., Lin, D. and Pasari, R., 2014. Strategic procurement from forward contract and
spot market. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(5), pp.778-796.
Lehmann, C.F., 2012. Strategy and business process management: techniques for improving
execution, adaptability, and consistency. CRC Press.
Leung, J., Cheung, W. and Chu, S.C., 2014. Aligning RFID applications with supply chain
strategies. Information & Management, 51(2), pp.260-269.
Lo, S.M. and Power, D., 2010. An empirical investigation of the relationship between
product nature and supply chain strategy. Supply Chain Management: An International
Journal, 15(2), pp.139-153.
Monczka, R.M., Handfield, R.B., Giunipero, L.C. and Patterson, J.L., 2015. Purchasing and
supply chain management. Cengage Learning.

Strategic Procurement 16
Nguyen, H., 2016. Supplier Selection Process in Café Industry: Case: X Coffee vs.
Starbucks.
Parmigiani, A., Klassen, R.D. and Russo, M.V., 2011. Efficiency meets accountability:
Performance implications of supply chain configuration, control, and capabilities. Journal of
Operations Management, 29(3), pp.212-223.
Prajogo, D. and Olhager, J., 2012. Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of
long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics
integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), pp.514-522.
Qi, Y., Zhao, X. and Sheu, C., 2011. The impact of competitive strategy and supply chain
strategy on business performance: the role of environmental uncertainty. Decision
Sciences, 42(2), pp.371-389.
Ross, R.B., Pandey, V. and Ross, K.L., 2015. Sustainability and strategy in US agri-food
firms: An assessment of current practices. International Food and Agribusiness Management
Review, 18(1), pp.17-48.
Smith, N.C., Palazzo, G. and Bhattacharya, C.B., 2010. Marketing’s consequences:
Stakeholder marketing and supply chain corporate social responsibility issues. Business
Ethics Quarterly, 20(4), pp.617-641.
Tate, W.L., Ellram, L.M. and Kirchoff, J.F., 2010. Corporate social responsibility reports: a
thematic analysis related to supply chain management. Journal of supply chain
management, 46(1), pp.19-44.
Umeda, Y., Takata, S., Kimura, F., Tomiyama, T., Sutherland, J.W., Kara, S., Herrmann, C.
and Duflou, J.R., 2012. Toward integrated product and process life cycle planning—An
environmental perspective. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 61(2), pp.681-702.
Yeh, W.C. and Chuang, M.C., 2011. Using multi-objective genetic algorithm for partner
selection in green supply chain problems. Expert Systems with applications, 38(4), pp.4244-
4253.