Unethical Practice Of Sweatshops

Running head: RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
NIKE
Responsible Business Enterprise
Essay
Student name
[Pick the date]

RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE 1
Overview
This essay is focused on literature review conducted by various authors related to unethical
practice of sweatshops conducted by various multinational organizations. This essay also
disclosure sweatshops operated by Nike organization, which is one of the biggest multinational
organizations in the world. It also explores failure of supply chain process operated by Nike
organization in various developing countries in which workers are being deprived of their basic
rights. It also includes worker exploitation done by MNC like Nike in order to attain maximum
benefit in less investment from developing countries where rules related to labour are not strong.
Literature review
According to Mezzadri, 2016, sweatshop issues are considered one of the biggest problems in
various corporates operating on the global level. Sweatshop has a direct impact on economic and
social stability of workers. Consumer activism is one of the important factors which can reduce
operation of sweatshops by eliminating myth in their mind. Myth like organizations that are
operating internationally inspect their business operations related to human rights violations.
Many consumers believe that fear of losing business positions due to negative image may restrict
organization to violate human right. But in order to generate more profit; these organizations
overlook human right aspect. Probably there are more chances that social audits can be easily
manipulated by these organizations for their own interest. In such situation, even consumer
action pays no advantage in controlling sweatshops under corporate social responsibility. Many
companies are using their advanced technology to green wash their unethical practices and
display a better image through their CSR profile in the form of performance.
According to Bair and Palpacuer, 2015, it has been found that companies role related to CSR
activities are reduced in resolving sweatshop issues. Public relations and contracts are able to
easily manipulate audit reports in order to maintain dominance of management over workers
right. Support from international organizations can play an important role but they do not show
any interest because things are revolving around radical activism. Therefore, it can be concluded
that consumer is not an important factor to open sweatshop by various companies. It is important
that company must introduce transparency in their business operations related to activities which
are associated with right of workers.
According to Drakulich, 2015, positive image of the organization in business market provokes
management to keep corporate governance in their operations in order to support equal rights
policy in the organization for every employee. In addition, at present there are campaigns like
naming and shaming. These campaigns have created a huge impact on the image of the
organization.
According Kates, 2019, it has been found that every country has their own definition to explain
sweatshop. In US, sweatshop is a factory which has broken almost two labour laws. This
involves big MNC like Wal-mart, K-mart, Nike and list goes on. Often sweatshop is found in

RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE 2
countries like China, Bangladesh, Vietnam and so on. In this sweatshop workers are exploited in
various forms it may be physically, verbally and are pressured to work for more than 20 hours a
day in order to meet quick orders. Workers are not offered any kind of health care facilities and
other benefits in these factories.
Critical analysis
In the past, sweatshop was reliant on homework in the form of contracting. In this system,
payments were offered to a family per piecework in their home or resident which had been
converted into a small factory. In addition, contracts were used to encourage workers to earn per
peace in this setting. Contract was done in both directions as well as indirect pattern. In indirect
or subcontract workers were paid less as compared to direct contract. These settings have leads
to labour exploitation mainly children and women which belong to poor sections of the
population especially in developing countries (Delaney and Macdonald, 2018). People living in
developing countries are under the pressure of unemployment and in this situation they are not
able to put their rights in front of management. Companies mostly take advantage of their
economic situation and force them to work for more hours with same pay. In some cases,
workers are not offered payment from three months and are being threatened to kick them off
from the job. Sweatshop pattern is usually common in manufacturing companies such as shoes,
cigars and other things. These shops are often operated in slum area in order to hide from various
human right organizations which are working for welfare of workers. Various governments had
acted on these sweatshops but still they are active in even some of the developed countries in
Asia. In these countries, sweatshop is operated from resident like factories which form risk
environment for workers.
From the study of workers’ rights consortium, it was found that one of the multinational
companies Nike is involved in sweatshops labour in various developing countries. Various
human right agencies have continuously blamed Nike organization for exploiting workers in
their various manufacturing plants by depriving them of their basic human rights. There were
reports related to the poor situation of workers who are working under the impact of sweatshop
approach of Nike Company. Many human right agencies have blamed that purpose behind this
sweatshop strategy is to extract more profit from worker which are living under the influence of
poverty. In addition, it was explored that workers are forced to do an extra hour shift without
paying them for overtime at high temperature in the plant (Schrempf-Stirling and Palazzo, 2016).
These workers are made to work even if they are suffering from health issues. Sweatshop is
responsible for their poor health and lifestyle which has pushed them in to depress and anxiety
environment. In this sweatshop, workers continuously face discrimination related to their race,
background and colour which is impacting mental balance of workers. Workers are also abused
by supervisors in order to show their dominance in workshops. Some human right agencies have
blamed that Nike has not allowed WRC group in their plants for inspection because they were
afraid of getting exposed to their unethical practices (Bain, 2017). A huge protest was clearly
seen in US that were launched by student groups as an anti-sweatshop by criticizing Nike