Rhetorical Analysis of John McDermott's How to Have a Conversation

1RHETORICAL ANALYSIS
Rhetorical Analysis
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

2RHETORICAL ANALYSIS
Topic- Rhetorical Analysis Essay
Introduction
The article of John McDermott titled as “ How to have a conversation” is nothing but the
writer’s journey who desired to investigate either the art of conversation can be taught in a
properly formal setting or not. He joined a professional conversation class in order to become a
great entertainer by the learnt skills. He realized after that the abstract ideas and the theories are
the main focus of the class. However, it could not obscure the useful lessons he had learnt from
the class regarding the purpose of conversation (Schneiderman, 2019). It is only through the use
of the rhetorical devices that the author expressed himself effectively, vividly and interestingly.
This paper will deal with the rhetorical analysis of John McDermott’s “ How to have a
conversation”.
The Rhetorical devices
The writer relied on the metaphors evident in the entire article in order to facilitate the
conceptualization of the ideas making his work effective and well understood. The Metaphors
are on the other hand brilliant in capturing the emotional state of an experience (Artemas, Vos &
Duffy, 2018). For the better understanding of their use, the literal language of McDermott can be
compared and contrasted with other articles. In the article of McDermott, there is a portion where
he says, “ none of my new friends said they wanted to be a raconteur in the Coleridge or the
Hitchens mould “. He selected to use the metaphor “ in the Hitchens mould “ for capturing the
quality being a fabulous conversationalist. He utilized Hitchens who is known in the world as an
example of a great conversationalist instead of describing all the conditions of his subject matter.

3RHETORICAL ANALYSIS
He also makes good use of the metaphor “we were Boswells, not Johnsons”. He also
tried his best to capture the well-meaning intentions and simplicity in one single word instead of
a plethora of the phrases The metaphors have further enabled the conceptualization of the
writer’s ideas through designing the work superiority. Taken for instance, the author also states
that “ they faced a white wall that had been attacked by black paint, which had left behind a
monochromatic mural”. It is where the writer sparks all his interest through the augmentation of
the metaphorical language. It can be said that it could have been less appealing for them to say
that their class room was having the black and white paint. Hence, it is pretty evident that the
metaphors are useful in creating a better understanding of what the writer had first experienced.
In this particular article, the writer has used diction for sustaining the interest in the piece
and at the same time enriching his own work. He used words such as “ raconteur “, “ raillery”
that had better synonyms such as “amusing speaker” and “ jest “ respectively . The issue is that
these words would not have incurred the same reaction as the choices of the author. The
selections of the words have successfully created a positive attitude towards the writer from the
readers as they give a proper impression of literary knowledge. Although these words are not
used in the regular language , there are some of the readers who would become attracted by th
words and apply in their language.
It is pretty sure that McDermott did not use the words meaninglessly or whimsically in
the article. He must have found the words to be the most effective for the expression of his
intentions. There are various synonyms of English which can be used to describe similar
situations but these words also can be used to allude to different aspects. Taken for another
instance, had the author desired to mock the American self help model, he would have addressed
the Americans to be “pretentious “, “fraudulent” or “overeager”. In that place, he described them