Risk Management Plan for Construction Project - Desklib
Verified
Added on  2023/06/09
|15
|3448
|473
AI Summary
This Risk Management Plan is helpful for developing the identification of the operations and aligning with the formation of the effective and improved mitigation process. It includes risk matrix, consequence table, likelihood table, escalation table, assessing top 10 risk, risk register table, required time contingency, and required cost contingency.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Risk Management Plan Name of the Student: Student ID: Name of the University: Author’s note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................................2 Risk Matrix for Construction Project..............................................................................................2 Consequence Table for Construction Project..................................................................................4 Likelihood Table for Construction Project......................................................................................5 Escalation Table for Construction Project.......................................................................................6 Assessing top 10 risk for Construction Project................................................................................7 Risk Register Table for Construction Project..................................................................................9 Required Time Contingency..........................................................................................................10 Required Cost Contingency...........................................................................................................10 Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................11 Bibliography..................................................................................................................................12
2RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Introduction The risk management plan is helpful for developing the identification of the operations and aligning with the formation of the effective and improved mitigation process (McNeil, Frey and Embrechts 2015). The risk management comprises of identifying the probable factors of risk or any measure of uncertainty on project objectives. The prospect of construction of the underground hole would be done while considering the implication of the effective and smart alignment process. The utilization of proper and successive management would allow the ease of modifying the tools and techniques for digging the underground holes. The following assignment has been developed on the case of construction of digging an underground hole by XYZ organization and it would include the formation of risk priority matrix, consequence table, likelihood table, escalation table, assessing top 10 risk, risk register table, required time contingency, and required cost contingency. The alignment has been successful for implementing the usage of proper and effective management process. Risk Matrix for Construction Project The risk matrix is a specific tool for deciding the evaluation of the risk for listing final development process (Lam 2014). The influence of the improved functional and development management is helpful for listing the management process. The risk matrix would be developed for aligning with the utilization of risk factors and forming the management process. The matrix would be implied for listing the proper and identical management process. The utilization would be managed for forming the analysis of the proper risk identification. The probable risk factors are rate of excavation, underground services, larger amount of rock when compared to soil, equipment damage, weather, site access, contaminated soil, person getting injured by excavator
3RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN or falling into excavation hole, delay in completion, and economic loss.The following is the risk matrix that can be used for analysing the risk in the construction projects, RatingLowMediumHigh Severity Likelihood MinorModerateMajorSevere Almost Certain (Above 70%) underground services Likely (45%-70%) Delayin completion rate of excavation larger amount of rock when compared to soil weather Unlikely (20%-45%) economic loss equipment damage Rare (5%-20%) contaminated soil person getting injured by excavator or falling into excavation hole site access Table 1: Risk matrix for Construction Project (Source: Created by the author) The matrix development would be formed for listing the probable implication and development. The management would be effectively managed for providing the utilization and usefulness integration (Agcaet al.2016). The risk matrix would be deployed for aligning the utilizationof theproperintegrationprocess.Theidentifiedriskhasbeenclassifiedinto
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN likelihood and severity factors. The completion of the project would require the formation of the effective risk management and development of operations. Consequence Table for Construction Project The consequence table is the deployment of the project activities and aligning the formation of the effective risk impact analysis. The consequence table would be made by analysing the impact of the risk identified. The consequence table for construction project is shown below, ScoreRisk NameRatingCostTime 4Underground servicesDevastating$400.00-500.004 1Equipment damageDevastating$400.00-500.002 3Delay in completionMinor$100.00-200.003 1Site accessMinor$100.00-200.002 1 Person getting injured by excavator or falling into excavation holeModerate$200.00-300.002 2 Larger amount of rock when compared to soilDevastating$400.00-500.002 3Contaminated soilSignificant$200.00-300.003 2Economic lossSignificant$300.00-400.002 3Rate of excavationDevastating$400.00-500.003 3WeatherDevastating$400.00-500.003 The table has shown the impact of the risk factors of rate of excavation, underground services, larger amount of rock when compared to soil, equipment damage, weather, site access,
5RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN contaminated soil, person getting injured by excavator or falling into excavation hole, delay in completion, and economic loss on the factors of cost and time. Likelihood Table for Construction Project The likelihood of the risk can be evaluated with the help of the likelihood table developed for the construction project. The identified risk would be evaluated based on the probability of the occurrence of the risk factors. The project completion likelihood would be formed for listing the probable inclusion of the factors of development. The likelihood of the occurrence of the project risk factors are shown below, Risk NameScoreRatingDescription Underground services4Most Likely The underground services would result in causing the risk of damage to the construction operations. Equipment damage1Rare The damages to the equipments while executing the construction activities would also act as a major risk for the organization. Delay in completion3Likely The performance delay due to any problem would result in bringing out the project completion Site access1Rare Unable to access site would also result in forming problems for the completion of the project Person getting injured by excavator or falling into excavation hole 1RareHealth and safety issues is the primary reason for occurrence of project completion Larger amount of rock when compared to soil2Unlikely Excavation of rocks would provide a major problem for easing the utilization of the successive options Contaminated soil3LikelySoil contamination would result in forming major problems of the implication model Economic loss2Unlikely Economic loss to the project would result in forming major problems for the project operations Rate of excavation3LikelyExcavation of activities would be implied for easing the utilization of the operations
6RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Weather3Likely Weather climatic conditions would be implied for forming issues in execution of the project activities of construction Accordingtothetablemadeabove,theallthetenrisksofrateofexcavation, underground services, larger amount of rock when compared to soil, equipment damage, weather, site access, contaminated soil, person getting injured by excavator or falling into excavation hole, delay in completion, and economic loss can be evaluated on the 4 rating/score of Almost Certain (4), Likely (3), Unlikely (2), and Rare (1). The table also involves the description of the risk in an effective method for allowing the implication of management issues. The description of the risk has been included in this table. Escalation Table for Construction Project The risk evaluation results in getting the escalation for the analysis of the possible problems of the project. The identified risk would be evaluated based on the consequences on the project operations and functions. The escalation table of the occurred project risk factors are shown below, Risk NameRisk Severity Ratin g Action Item Requirement Underground servicesSevere4Cause Decrease of profit and harm to the operations and reputation of the company Equipment damageSevere4 Probable Increase in the contractor’s payment, violation of operations, and issues in development Delay in completionMinor1SLA violation, Time SLA disagreement, and bad reputation of organization Site accessMinor1Issues to the health policy and harm to the operations of development Person getting injured by excavator or falling into Moderate2SLA violation, harm to the social and cultural environment of the company
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN excavation hole Larger amount of rock when compared to soilSevere4 Probable Increase in the payment, harm to the social and cultural environment of the company Contaminated soilModerate2 Cause decrease of profit, issues to the health policy, harm to the operations, reputation of the company Economic lossMajor3Cause decrease of profit, issues to the health policy, and SLA violation Rate of excavationMajor3 Cause decrease of profit, harm to the operations, social, and cultural environment of the company WeatherSevere4 Cause decrease of profit and impact on operations Accordingtothetablemadeabove,theallthetenrisksofrateofexcavation, underground services, larger amount of rock when compared to soil, equipment damage, weather, site access, contaminated soil, person getting injured by excavator or falling into excavation hole, delay in completion, and economic loss can be evaluated on the 4 rating/score of severe (4), major (3), moderate (2), and minor (1). The table also involves the description of the requirement of action for allowing the implication of management issues. The action item requirement for the identified risk factor has been included in this table. Assessing top 10 risk for Construction Project The top ten risk of the construction projects are rate of excavation, underground services, largeramountof rockwhencomparedtosoil,equipmentdamage,weather,siteaccess, contaminated soil, person getting injured by excavator or falling into excavation hole, delay in completion, and economic loss. These risks would form the impact on the financial, health and safety,environmental,legal,reputational,social,andculturaloptionsoftheconstruction projects.
8RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Underground services:The underground services would result in causing the risk of damage to the construction operations. Equipment damage:The damages to the equipments while executing the construction activities would also act as a major risk for the organization. Delay in completion:The performance delay due to any problem would result in bringing out the project completion Site access:Unable to access site would also result in forming problems for the completion of the project Person getting injured by excavator or falling into excavation hole:Health and safety issues are the primary reason for occurrence of project completion. It is highly possible that the human labours would get hurt during working due to accidents. Larger amount of rock when compared to soil:Excavation of rocks would provide a major problem for easing the utilization of the successive options Contaminated soil:Soil contamination would result in forming major problems of the implication model Economic loss:Economic loss to the project would result in forming major problems for the project operations Rate of excavation:Excavation of activities would be implied for easing the utilization of the operations. However due to problems in excavation the project can be delayed.
9RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Weather:Weather climatic conditions would be implied for forming issues in execution of the project activities of construction
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
9RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Risk Register Table for Construction Project The risk register table would be developed for aligning the utilization of the operations and listing the successive formation management. The risk register table would be aligned for forming the management of the improved functional development. The risk register table has been shown below, Risk IdentificationControlsRisk AnalysisTreatmentResidual Risk AnalysisCost ConsequenceSchedule Consequence Risk TitleRisk/ Opportunity Control Measure Control Effectiven ess Control Owner Consequen ces (1-5) Likeliho od (1-5) Ris k Sco re (1- 25) Treatm ent Decision Treatment Measure Responsibi lity Co st Due DateStatusConsequen ces (1-5) Likeliho od (1-5) Ris k Sco re (1- 25) Best Case Most Likel y Wors t Case Assumpti ons for cost consequen ces Bes t Cas e Mos t Like ly Wor st Case Assumpti ons for schedule consequen ces Underground servicesRisk Quality Improveme nt Plan should be included StrongContract or 4416Mitigate Quality Improveme nt Plan should be included Contractor12/6/20 18 Complet ed 339$400. 00 $450. 00 $500. 00-345- Equipment damageRisk Negotiation Should be implied WeakContract or 414Avoid Negotiation Should be implied Contractor18/6/18Complet ed 300$400. 00 $450. 00 $500. 00-123- Delay in completionRisk Time Manageme nt StrongPlanner133Accept Time Manageme nt Planner21/6/18Complet ed 020$100. 00 $150. 00 $200. 00-234- Site accessRisk Proper Documentat ion MediumDocumen ter 111Share Proper Documentat ion Documente r 4/7/201 8 Complet ed 000$100. 00 $150. 00 $200. 00-123- Person getting injured by excavator or falling into excavation holeRisk Training shoud be given MediumWorkers212Avoid Training shoud be given Workers10/7/20 18 In Progress 100$200. 00 $250. 00 $300. 00-123- Larger amount of rock when compared to soilRisk Negotiation Should be implied WeakWorkers428Share Negotiation Should be implied Workers16/7/18In Progress 313$400. 00 $450. 00 $500. 00-123- Contaminated soilRisk Contractor should be included StrongSupplier236Transfer Contractor should be included Supplier26/7/18In Progress 122$200. 00 $250. 00 $300. 00-234- Economic lossRisk Contractor should be included MediumBudgeter326Transfer Contractor should be included Budgeter6/8/201 8 In Progress 212$300. 00 $350. 00 $400. 00-123- Rate of excavationRisk Quality Improveme nt Plan should be included StrongQuality Analyst 339Mitigate Quality Improveme nt Plan should be included Quality Analyst 12/8/20 18 Not Started 224$300. 00 $350. 00 $400. 00-234- WeatherRiskNo ActionWeakNA4312AcceptNo ActionNA20/8/18Not Started 4312$400. 00 $450. 00 $500. 00-234-
10RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Required Time Contingency S. NoRisk Name Time best case (a) most likely (b) worse case (c) Expected ((a+(4*b)+c)/ 6) 1Construction Issues3454 2Contractor Disagreement1232 3Delay in completion2343 4Documentation Issues1232 5Human Mistakes1232 6Labour Unrest1232 7Lack of Materials2343 8Over budget1232 9Quality Issues2343 10Weather Condition2343 Total16263626 Required Cost Contingency S. NoRisk Name Cost best case (a) most likely (b) worse case (c) Expected ((a+(4*b)+c)/6) 1Construction Issues$400.00$450.00$500.00$450.00 2Contractor Disagreement$400.00$450.00$500.00$450.00 3Delay in completion$100.00$150.00$200.00$150.00 4Documentation Issues$100.00$150.00$200.00$150.00 5Human Mistakes$200.00$250.00$300.00$250.00 6Labour Unrest$400.00$450.00$500.00$450.00 7Lack of Materials$200.00$250.00$300.00$250.00 8Over budget$300.00$350.00$400.00$350.00 9Quality Issues$300.00$350.00$400.00$350.00 10Weather Condition$400.00$450.00$500.00$450.00 Total$2,800.00$3,300.00$3,800.00$3,300.00
11RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Conclusion The risk management plan was helpful for developing the identification of the operations andaligningwiththeformationoftheeffectiveandimprovedmitigationprocess.The assignment has been developed on the case of construction of digging an underground hole by XYZ organization and it had include the formation of risk priority matrix, consequence table, likelihood table, escalation table, assessing top 10 risk, risk register table, required time contingency,andrequiredcostcontingency.Thealignmenthasbeensuccessfulfor implementing the usage of proper and effective management process. The utilization of proper and successive management had allowed the ease of modifying the tools and techniques for digging the underground holes.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
12RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Bibliography Agca, R., Heslinga, S.C., Rollefstad, S., Heslinga, M., McInnes, I.B., Peters, M.J.L., Kvien, T.K., Dougados, M., Radner, H., Atzeni, F. and Primdahl, J., 2016. EULAR recommendations for cardiovascular disease risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other forms ofinflammatoryjointdisorders:2015/2016update.Annalsoftherheumaticdiseases, pp.annrheumdis-2016. Bessis, J., 2015.Risk management in banking. John Wiley & Sons. Bromiley, P., McShane, M., Nair, A. and Rustambekov, E., 2015. Enterprise risk management: Review, critique, and research directions.Long range planning,48(4), pp.265-276. Glendon, A.I., Clarke, S. and McKenna, E., 2016.Human safety and risk management. Crc Press. Hammad, M.W., Abbasi, A. and Ryan, M.J., 2016. Allocationand managementof cost contingency in projects.Journal of Management in Engineering,32(6), p.04016014. Hopkin,P.,2018.Fundamentalsofriskmanagement:understanding,evaluatingand implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers. Lam, J., 2014.Enterprise risk management: from incentives to controls. John Wiley & Sons. McNeil, A.J., Frey, R. and Embrechts, P., 2015.Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools-revised edition. Princeton university press.
13RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Ramachandrappa, B.K., Thimmegowda, M.N., Sathish, A., Jagadeesh, B.N., Devaraja, K., Babu, P.S.andSavitha,M.S.,2016.RealTimeContingencyMeasurestoCopewithRainfall Variability in Southern Karnataka.Indian J. Dryland Agric. Res. & Dev,31(1), pp.37-43. Rispo, A., Imperatore, N., Testa, A., Bucci, L., Luglio, G., De Palma, G.D., Rea, M., Nardone, O.M., Caporaso, N. and Castiglione, F., 2018. Combined Endoscopic/Sonographic-Based Risk Matrix Model for Predicting One-Year Risk of Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study of a Tertiary Center Severe/Refractory Crohn’s Disease Cohort.Journal of Crohn's and Colitis,1, p.10. Solberg, I.C., Høivik, M.L., Cvancarova, M. and Moum, B., 2015. Risk matrix model for prediction of colectomy in a population-based study of ulcerative colitis patients (the IBSEN study).Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology,50(12), pp.1456-1462. Wolke, T., 2017.Risk Management. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.