This report discusses the importance of risk management and identification for business organizations and strategies to mitigate risks. It focuses on the major risks faced by Corwin Corporation and provides strategies to prioritize and manage them. The report also discusses communication strategies with stakeholders.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Risk management plan Name of the student Name of the university Author note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Introduction Risk management and identification is important for the business organizations in mitigating the probability and impact of emergence of risks. The organizations should have the proper and suitable mechanism for identification of the risks and assessing them on the basis of their probability and impacts. In this case, the risk impact and probability matrix is beneficial for rating and prioritizing the risks (Cardona, 2013). This report will discuss about the major risks being faced by Corwin international and will use the risk matrix in prioritizing it. On the basis of the risks identified, responses strategies in mitigating the risks and the communication strategies to be involved with the involved stakeholders will also be discussed in this report. Risk CategoryRisk DescriptionRisk CauseImpactLikelihoo dRating FinanceOverrunoffinancial resources Financial limitation4-Major5-Almost CertainExtreme CommercialLackofrightlyskilled employees lack ofproperlytrained employees 3- Moderate4-LikelyHigh SafetyLack of R&D expertiselack of prior experienece4-Major3-PossibleHigh Commerciallackofcoordinationwith the client no proper channel3- Moderate3-PossibleMedium Identification of the risks One of the major risks identified for Corwin Corporation is the overrun of the financial resources. This is due to the reason that in the case study it is stated that Corwin Corporation is investing their own capital for the standards tests as their cost gone beyond the contracted budget. Moreover, as the contract was signed based on fixed cost, the client Peter was not responsible for paying for the added capital. Thus, it caused financial burden for Corwin Corporation (Hopkin, 2018). The more impact of the financial burden will be the lack of funds for other business activities of Corwin Corporation. This is due to the reason that there are number of other activities especially the production activities are done by Corwin Corporation
2RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN and the added financial cost got added from the allocated annual budget of the from. Thus, outflow of the fund from the allocated budget will cause financial pressure on the development of other activities (Bolton, Chen & Wang, 2013). On the other hand, it is also identified that lack of rightly skilled and expert employees from the engineering department is another risk for Corwin Corporation. This is due to the reason that marketing department of Corwin Corporation is only having the skilled employees who can deal with the customers. This is a major gap for Corwin Corporation. Lack of skilled and expert employees is causing issues in the project. In the case study, it is identified that west is selected based on his expertise in the engineering department but not on the basis of dealing with the customers. Thus, he was not able to manage the undue requirements of the customer. Thus, the major impact from this identified risk will be the dissatisfaction of the employees along with the loss for the company (Bromiley et al., 2015). If the customers cannot be managed well, then they will get dissatisfied and will not be loyal to the company. In the case study, it is reported that Corwin Corporation also faced the termination of the contract from Peters due to the dissatisfaction. In the future, Corwin Corporation will face more loss if the customers cannot be managed well. Another risk identified is the lack of R&D expertise. In the case study, it is reported that Corwin Corporation is not having expertise in research and development needed prior to the production process. Thus, accepting the business deal of initiating research and development activities is also a major risk for Corwin Corporation (Aven & Zio, 2014). This risk will involve non-controllable financial loss and safety issues. As Corwin Corporation is not having prior expertise in this area, the safety aspects of the involved stakeholders might get compromised.
3RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Mitigating strategies One of the major strategies that can be beneficial in managing the identified risks is the contingency budget. This is due to the fact that creating contingency budget planning will help Corwin Corporation to have the reserved fund to be used during the emergency situation. Thus, in case of any projects getting beyond the allocated budget, this reserved budget will come handy. Another mitigation strategy recommended is the providence of training and development plan for the staffs from the engineering department. These staffs should also have the skills of managing the customers (Vovchenko et al., 2017). Thus, if they can be trained and developed, they will also be able to manage the staffs like the marketing department. On the other hand, it should be noted that even though taking research and development based jobs is risky for Corwin Corporation due to lack of expertise, but taking more of it will ensure that they are gaining the requiredexpertise.Thus,theyshoulddeveloptheinfrastructureoftheirresearchand development process and take up more contracts in gaining more expertise. Treatment StrategyTreatment DescriptionTreatment ResourcesRisk OwnerDeadline Avoidcontingency budget buildingBudgetary reformsAccountant2 weeks Avoidtraining programtraining elementsHR personnel4 week AcceptMore R&D based jobsmore human resource involvementsOperations24 weeks Acceptproper service standardsstandardized sets of regulations and provisions HR personnel4 weeks Stakeholder communication Information regarding the ongoing risk management activities should be communicated to the stakeholders by means of general meetings in the presmises. Corwin Corporation is
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN conductingtwohalfyearlymeetingseachyearandtheinformationregardingtherisk management activities along with the different elements should be communicated through these general meetings. This will help Corwin Corporation to gain the feedback from the stakeholders regardingtheactivities(Pasman,Knegtering&Rogers,2013).Inaddition,itisalso recommended that the stakeholders can also be communicated through making it compulsory for the stakeholders involved in the project. Thus, the stakeholders involved in the project should be signed in the risk management plan and it will ensure that they are getting the information about any updates. Conclusion Thus, it can be concluded that there are number of risks being faced by Corwin Corporation in terms of their project in research and development. In this report, each of these major risks are being identified and analyzed. These risks will have adverse impacts on the long term business operation of Corwin Corporation. In addition, this report has also discussed the strategies that can be used in mitigating the risks in the long term. These strategies include building contingency budget, providence of training to the engineering employees and accepting more research and development based jobs. All these strategies will ensure that the identified risks are mitigated. A few ways of communicating and informing the stakeholders about the risk management plan are also discussed. A separate risk management plan is attached with this report. Reference Aven, T., & Zio, E. (2014). Foundational issues in risk assessment and risk management.Risk Analysis,34(7), 1164-1172.
5RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Bolton, P., Chen, H., & Wang, N. (2013). Market timing, investment, and risk management. Journal of Financial Economics,109(1), 40-62. Bromiley, P., McShane, M., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. (2015). Enterprise risk management: Review, critique, and research directions.Long range planning,48(4), 265-276. Cardona, O. D. (2013). The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: a necessary review and criticism for effective risk management. In Mapping vulnerability(pp. 56-70). Routledge. Hopkin,P.(2018).Fundamentalsofriskmanagement:understanding,evaluatingand implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers. Pasman, H. J., Knegtering, B., & Rogers, W. J. (2013). A holistic approach to control process safety risks: Possible ways forward.Reliability Engineering & System Safety,117, 21-29. Vovchenko, N. G., Holina, G. M., Orobinskiy, A. S., & Sichev, R. A. (2017). Ensuring financial stability of companies on the basis of international experience in construction of risks maps, internal control and audit.European Research Studies Journal,20(1), 350-368.