Rural Councils Transformation Program

Rural Councils Transformation Program
Business Case Report
Rural Councils Transformation Program
1

[Business Case / Proposal Name]
Lead council(s) and contact details [Name of lead council / public entity]
Member councils / entities [Name of member councils / public entities]
Total funding requirements: [Detail total funding in allocations over time]
Rural Councils Transformation Program
2

Contents
1. Overview....................................................................................................................................... 4
1.1 Executive Summary..................................................................................................................... 4
2. Problem identification................................................................................................................. 4
2.1 Background.................................................................................................................................. 4
2.2 Definition and evidence of the problem.....................................................................................4
2.3 Timing considerations................................................................................................................. 4
3. Project Plan................................................................................................................................................ 5
3.1 Strategic Planning................................................................................................................................... 5
3.2 Planning.................................................................................................................................................... 5
4. Recommended (preferred) solution........................................................................................... 6
4.1 Details of recommended solution.............................................................................................. 6
4.2 Partnering – legal / governance arrangements.........................................................................7
4.3 Committee Members................................................................................................................................ 7
4.4 Board Meetings........................................................................................................................................ 8
4.5 Scalability of the recommended solution..................................................................................8
4.6 Alternatives considered.............................................................................................................. 9
4.7 Evaluation strategy...................................................................................................................... 9
4.8 What are the implications of a ‘business as usual’ approach?.............................................10
4.9 Cost table............................................................................................................................................... 12
5. Regulation and monitoring..................................................................................................................... 12
5.1 Challenging Elections and Political Participation...............................................................................12
5.2 Campaigning by RDA Chairs, Members and Employees...................................................................12
5.3 Launches, Seminars or Other Public Events......................................................................................13
5.4 Information Campaigns and Promotional Activities...........................................................................13
5.5 Provision of Information....................................................................................................................... 13
5.6 Fund Raising Events............................................................................................................................. 13
Rural Councils Transformation Program
3

1. Overview
1.1 Executive Summary
This is a procedure utilized when a network or association as of now has an extensive arrangement or has set up a
lot of long go objectives and needs to push ahead to accomplish those objectives. Vital arranging includes the
investment of the network in recognizing issues that remain between the network and its objectives and pushes the
network toward understanding its long-extend vision. The result of vital arranging, frequently essentially called the
"key arrangement," expands on pre-set up long-extend objectives by structuring activities identified with at least
one of these objectives. A key arrangement for the most part takes at any rate a year to finish and are commonly
more present moment in nature, covering a one to multiyear time length.
2. Problem identification
2.1 Background
An outline business case for a project that use the money raised to make some improvements to the older areas of
Greyville. Dan Black is very busy in his normal job and has left it up to you to propose a viable project in
consultation with local people. He wants it to be based on research for similar successful schemes that could
address some of the issues faced by local people in the poorer communities. Greyville is a community 10km north
of Blue City, the capital of Eastern Australia. It has 20,000 occupants. Topographically there is currently an
unmistakable separation between the more established territories of the town which regularly contain poor families,
frail lodging and have higher than normal wrongdoing rate; and the new lodging bequests that have been based on
the edges of Greyville. These new lodging domains give fantastic suburbanite lodging, shops and recreational
offices for expert specialists from Blue City. On the other hand, a significant number of the families who live in the
less fortunate pieces of Greyville experience the ill effects of lower than normal earnings, higher than normal
joblessness, and higher than normal medical problems.
2.2 Definition and evidence of the problem
June Green accepts that the nature and subtleties of the proposed undertaking should originate from the network
themselves, instead of being ordered by her. She sees her job as having the option to activate authority backing
and consolation to any proposed venture, and to 'get things going' if the venture experiences any official obstruction
during its execution. As may be normal, June Green realizes that not every person concurs with her. A nearby
campaigner called Jan April questions everything that June Green says. Jan April says that poor people network
are powerless, and all activities ought to be coordinated and financed by the administration, and not by
philanthropy.
Additionally, the LHT needs to be convinced about spending their fund for the local government. The project is
developed in order to enhance the current lifestyle of the poor residents by providing education, food and a better
place to live, The objective of the LHT is also associated with the community growth and can be align with the
potential solution of the problem.
2.3 Timing considerations
Setting time limitations for finishing assignments causes project manager to be progressively engaged and
proficient. Endeavouring to choose how much time you have to dispense for each errand can likewise enable you
to perceive potential issues before they emerge. That way one can make arrangements for managing them.
Rural Councils Transformation Program
4