Safeguarding Children: Reflection on a Case of Sexual Exploitation
Verified
Added on 2023/01/13
|16
|5150
|20
AI Summary
This study explores a case of child sexual exploitation, the role of agencies in safeguarding the child, and the importance of statutory policies. It discusses the impact of sexual abuse on the child, the support provided by agencies, and the legislation to protect children from abuse.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
SAFEGUARDING CHILDREN 1
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
This study is about child’s sexual molestation case history, its reflection on the child,helpingagencies,theprospectsofsafeguardingthatchildwithrespectto probable risk management, interpersonal roles and vulnerability. This discussion also includes the legislations to keep children in a safe position in case of sexual abuse.The focus of the study is to increase awareness about a person’s roles and responsibilities that they are required to fulfil in order to follow statutory policies. According to Warr (2014, p.17) the term“child abuse”refers to any form of violence, mistreatment or neglect applied to a child by an adult and there are four types of abuse: neglect, physical, emotional and sexual abuse.Sexual exploitationis a form of abuse that can take place in the areas of work, colleges, and schools and even at home which may tend the child to face post order trauma, anxiety, depression and many more mental health issues that can be faced by a person in his/her adulthood.Sexual exploitation is a serious issue for the child that should be taken seriously in order to reduced and eliminate the risk of being abused (Pearce,2019,p.154). This study is an example of thousands of cases like Katie from UK. In the case of chosen SCR, Katie started facing sexual exploitation from the age of 14. Katie lived with her mother at first, after the separation of her parents. She was neglected and was forced to live in a caravan outside the home. Katie started living with her father after some time. However, her father shared her home with other men and the environment was not suitable for Katie at all.Slowly she started using foul language and became a drug addict.Katie had nobody who could take care of her, although both of her father and mother were alive. She started living in foster care. 2
Katie got support from several agencies like Family Support Service and Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub.These are the two main agencies who worked on assignment to support family by identifying Katie as a “Child in need”.This shows that social welfare agencies got involved to rescue Katie who was trying to self-harm. The roles of agenciesfor supporting the sexual abuse victim children or likely to be sufferedaretoprotectthemfromgettingfurthermolestationorneglect.The organisations try to explore the bad experiences and feelings of the victims. They try to provideemotionalsupport including rebuildingtrustonsociety. They also provide counselling that will help the child to overcome the trauma, cope up with the post incidentalsymptomslikeanxiety,depression,posttraumaticorder,flashbacks, nightmares and most importantly to eliminate the tendency of self-harm. With mental health, the agencies also provide care for physical needs after trauma. They look for reducing further risk factors for that particularchild so that they can be both mentally and physically stable in adulthood(Henderson & Thompson, 2015, p.631). The initiative that is taken by agencies in general for reducing cases like Katie is to guide families who are in need or risk with respect to this aspect. In Katie’s caseschool took some steps to ensured that education of the victim is not affected even after she moved to another school. Not only this Katie’s GP also came forward about Child Sexual Exploitation and shared some information with“Children’s Social Care”(Davieset al., 2015). A number of child abuse caring practitioners from severalagenciesdevelopedstrongrelationships withthevictim, Katie,whichhas helped her to overcome the trauma she was going through.They invested sufficient 3
time with Katie and her family in order to provide mental support to them(Sheehan, 2018). The agencies ensuredthat all the services that were provided to the victim and her familyshould be in a continuation until she gets justice and gets stable. For this reason, Katie was provided with a taxi to go to school as a part of care and safety. CAFCASS ensured that Katie had suffered a lotand meets the criteria of Serious Case Review. The agencies also ensured that she should be getting good nursing by the school nurse in order to maintain her sexual health check-ups as well as mental health(GDC, 2019). From the above brief description it is clear there is a huge role of agencies in order to support the victims of child sexual abuseso that risk management can be maintained, and support can be provided to organizations that help victims like Katie.There are some vulnerable factors behind in every sexual abuse case and in the case of child molestation; the factors are even huge and high in number. The factors of increasing vulnerability to child sexual abuse and neglect are divided mainly into two parts like; family factors and child factors (Laneet al.,2016).Katie was in a situation due to the habit of taking drugs like“sex for drugs”.Many times, she went missing for the same willingly.These are sufficient cause that helps in explaining vulnerable situation of teenagers like Katie. The definitions and credentials of the serious case review of the child’s sexual abuse of Katie areexplainedhere. The above discussion sketches that the factors of vulnerability that increases the chance of sexual molestation, the role of risk management to control the after-effect of sexual molestation as well as the risk of being molested. The role of 4
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
agenciesfor reducing abuse rate and supporting victims like Katie so that they can live a stable life both physically and mentally.The study shows that Katie the victim is getting sufficient support from multiagencyin order to cope up with her situation. According to the research of GOV.uk (2019),it is clear that Katie is being effectively supported by various organizations who support sexual victim.They are continuously working on Katie and her family’s case according toSCR.The agencies are providing mental and physical health support to the victim and the family to cope up with the problems they have faced. Agencies have organised a timely review of SCR from a legal perspective. Katie was provided by timely sexual heath checkups even by the schoolnurse without hindering her school education. She was also provided with early help till 2016(WHO, 2019). The risk factor of being abused again has been reduced with the positive efforts of agencies as well as the government. The study of NSPCC (2019) shows that there were some things that could be done by the agencies in this case like; multi-agencies should encourage all the practitioners of that organisationwork with the childin a conjugated manner. They must focus on to reduce theinfluenceof drugs and alcohol in order to decrease the rate of sexual molestation among children and teenagers. The agencies must look after the change in legal aspects, services and staff in order to provide for continuation of facilitiesthat a victim should getwith respect to SCR (Saied-Tessier, 2014). Thus, the critical analysis shows that there are somepros and cons of these agencies who provide medical and legal support Katie who is a victim of sexual exploitation. 5
The first children act in the United Kingdom came into force in 1989.The Children Act 1989wasbroughtintoforcetoprovideclear andwell-structuredlaws.Thechild protection legislation can be categorized into civil and criminal law. Civil laws are to keep children away from harm and include the actions that should be taken to reduce the risk factors. In addition, it gives guidelines for family matters such as divorce. On the other hand, Criminal laws include actions, which can be taken against people who have caused harm tochildren (Lindon, 2012, pp.5-6). The Children Act 1989:The welfare of children was the main concern of this act. This act stated that both mother and father, married or not, are responsible for a child. Section 20 of the act states local authorities should provide care for children in the absence of any parental figure. In addition, the views of the children have to be taken intoaccountwhiledecidingtheaccommodations.Section26makestheregular reviewing mandatory for the local authority (Legislation, 2019). However, the Children Act of 1989 was amended in 2004. TheChildrenAct2004:Theamendedacthadallthefeaturesoftheprevious legislation and added some new regulations regarding children's commission. This act stated that along with creating a Children’s Commission, which will ensure children Safety in England, local authorities will be promoting the wellbeing of children (Leigh andLaing,2018).Moreover,thisactlimitedtheusageofdefenceofphysical punishment of a child abuser. Sexual Offences Act 2003:This act includes all the acts that come under sexual offences. This act is similar to section 47 of the legislation of 1989, which states that action should be taken when a child faces the risk of harm in any situation by any 6
individual (CPS, 2019).This act mainly focuses on covering sexual assault, non- consensual offence of rape, assault by penetration and causing a person to engage in sexual activity without their consent. AnimportantactliketheChildrenActof1989statesabouttheprofessional responsibilities of safeguarding children should have commitment to the children’s wellbeing. According to theChildren Act of 2004, children commission was formed to define and implement the responsibilities(Brennan and Phippen, 2019). These acts were brought into force within a year when UK passed guidelines on ways to keep children safe in every situation. The individuals or professionals responsible for children-safety should follow some policies, which are mentioned below: Conforming to Legislation (2019), the act of 1989 ensures that a child always has a parental figure. Maximum care can be ensured for a child by making both mother and father responsible. The responsibilities of the local authority in the absence of the parentalfigures,addtosafetymeasures.Modietal.(2014)assertedthatany responsible individual or authority is bound to provide care for the children regardless of theirreligion, religion and other factors. This act has been able to ensure the maximum safety of any child in any circumstances. According to Legislation (2019), the Children Act of 2004 mentions the formation Children Commission. The commission must analyse and evaluate any matter relating to child safety and make reports based on them.The commission should focus on publishing a report which is suitable for children. According to a websiteGP notebook (2019), asserted that proper monitoring on the safety of the children all over the country would be possible by the implementation of this section of the act. 7
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
As per the findings ofSafeguarding Children, Young People and Vulnerable Adults Policy,theChildrenActof1989statesthattheprofessionalsresponsiblefor safeguarding children should have a commitment to their wellbeing. Local authorities, police force, various care facilities- all have statutory duties to maintain child safety. Keeping Children Safe (2014) agreed that commitment towards wellbeing helps in the cause of safeguarding the children. It is important for all the individuals responsible for safeguarding children should be equipped and skilled to play their roles effectively. The Child Act of 1989 states that local authorities or individuals must consider the views of a child in need before sending him to any care facility (GovUK, 2019). The religion, race, culture and so on of the child in need should be taken into account as well. Transparency Project (2019) agrees that the most suitable accommodation can be decided by considering the view of a child. According to Hairston (2017), the act of 2004 mentions, Regular reviews will provide the details of the current condition of the child. This will establish whether the current facilities in which child is living are suitable for them or not. It is understood that there are possible avenues to maintain the safety of a child by regularly reviewing his/her conditions and the environment (Working Together, 2019). According toWilson(2018), the Sexual Offences Act of 2003 states, the identification of the risk factor is very important for the person responsible for safeguarding the children. The responsible person should inform the police or local authority immediately when a child is indanger. The child in protection may try to express his distress or problems. The person responsible for the child should listen and create a comfortable atmosphere 8
for the child.CPS (2019) agrees that identification of the issues that can causeharm to a childis important. This will help in reducing the risk factors. In case of this serious case,Positive effects of multi agencies are explained in a elaborated manner. After the sorrowful incident of sexual exploitation happened with Katie, several agencies came front to help the family and the girl with health care, mental care and justice.From the year of 2015, the family of Katie were receiving intensive Early help until she came into care i.e. family got Early Help till April 2018 until she was moved to a specialist residential. There are some responsibilities of multi- agencies in case of responding to child sexual abuse andneglect(NICE, 2017). The local authorities can follow the Ofsted current system for developing new framework of child safety. Moreover, the multinational agency meeting should be held for developing the policies for supporting the family support services. This will help to improve the safeguarding of children. Moreover,Children protection theoryshould be followed for improving the integrated Family support services that is important for taking steps against the issue of child abuse (Searing, 2019). Furthermore,crisis intervention theorythat has been developed by the government should be followed for providing children service. It would help in recognising the intervention for enhancing the child protection in different regions of UK. Local authorities and agencies play a crucial part in the safeguarding of the children. As per the findings of UNICEF (2019), communication and motivation play an important part in dealing with abused children. Children may lose their motivation and confidence. They may have a problem in communicating and interacting with others. Therefore, a 9
friendly atmosphere should be created where the effected child can get back to his normal self. Based on the thorough study of Katie’s case, communication and building motivation was highly recommendedby the agencies who took care of Katie. The individuals responsible for safeguarding Katie were recommended to focus on her and her environment. In addition, the findings of UNICEF (2019) suggest that engagement of the effected child becomes a serious matter. The affected children may have a tough time overcoming their bad experiences and trauma. The individuals responsible for taking care of the effected child should find ways for engagement. The focus of the child will move from the bad experience when he has other things to do.For example engaging child in extra-curricular activities such as painting, sports will help them to divert child from their bad experience. Engagement was established as a key factor in the case of Katie as well. As per the findings ofModiet al.(2014), the Child Act of 2004 stated that the children in need should be provided help and accommodation regardless of any factor. Moreover, the act stated that all the caretaking agencies, local authorities and another individual must take active part in the safeguarding of children. Katie was put into foster care for her wellbeing. However, she had grown some bad habits such as smoking and using bad language while she was staying with her father. Nonetheless, she was provided with help. Moreover, it was established that Katiehadgone missing for some time. Nonetheless, the care agencies played a crucial part in keeping her safe. The Family Support Service stood by Katie and her close ones since 2005. Katie had lived with her father and in foster care in the past few years. As per the findings ofSafer 10
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Children York (2019) the main purpose ofChildren Act of 1989, is to meet the individual needs of each child. In addition, the act stated that monitoring of the affected children is crucial. The recommendations for Katie included this key factor. It was recommended that all the information regarding the case must be gathered and analysed. It will help to understand her situation properly and ensure a proper care planning. The findings of NSPCC (2019) discovered the case of Patrick and Patricia, which seemed to be similar to Katie. The two half-siblings faced the risk of sexual abuse. Their father and grandfather were accused of abusing girls sexually. Their mother was not able to take their responsibility. The siblings ended in foster care in the absence of parental figure. However, children care serviceskept in touchwith the family since the time Patrick was born because of family history. A big issue in the case of Katie was her being neglected. The issue was the same in the case of Mathew and his three siblings. Their mother did not have the capability to care for her children. Mathew had to be hospitalized with a fractured skull. The injury was not due to an accident. His mother’s addiction to drugs prevented her from taking proper care for the children. The case of Katie was more serious than Patrick, Patricia, and Mathew. Katie was both neglected and sexually assaulted. Patrick and Patricia did not have to face any abuse as they were in constant monitoring of care agencies. The identification of risk factors, which could harm them, was done in time. Therefore, it was possible to prevent danger. On the other hand, Mathew and his three siblings went through more than Patrick and Patricia.Katie would not have to face the issues, if all kinds of risk factors in the environment in which they live were diagnosed earlier. 11
The possible theoretical perspectives relating to the chosen SCR focusing on the causes of the child has increased vulnerability.In Katie’s case, she was a victim of sexual exploitation, this reason was itself sufficient to prove her vulnerability. The serious case review shows that Katiewasfound missing at the beginning of the September month of 2016. She used to smoke cannabis and was really at a high risk of Child Sexual Exploitation. However, the risk assignment says that she was at medium risk. From April 2016, Katie had gone missing nearly three times and at the end of September that year, she disclosed her sexual activity with an older male and a teacher. In the middle of October, she facedsuspensionfor 3 days for smoking in the school premises and this was not her first time (Early Intervention Foundation, 2018). Her mother was not ready to keep her at home; the property owner of her dad was not ready to keep her on his premises. Due to this, she had to change her placemanytime, which had worsened the condition of the victim more. All these reasons are sufficient to increase the risk of being sexually abused for a teenager like Katie. A child must be taken care of by the legal carer or the parents at first. To deal with the problem of sexual abuse the parents must be more caring, attentive and patient (Brown, 2019). They must actively listen to their children,involvewith them to help them out or make them aware of such situations. Parents must inspire their children to empower and to find solutions for the occurred problem. Parents must monitor their children’s current involvement to measure the riskof CSE (child sexual exploitation). On the other hand, the responsibilities of agencies working with the victim's families must focus on building trustwhere they could be available for the victimised person and 12
family. In United Kingdom the cases of CSE(child sexual exploitation)are increasing at a high rate as per the study says. Thus, the case of Katie shows that the needed efforts to reduce and wipe out the chances of child sexual exploitation need more attention and efficient solutions in the United Kingdom (Childrens Commissioner, 2019). In this case, using psychological theory of child abuse, it can be figured that Katie has been harmed and exploited sexually. Hence, parents need to be more conscious for improving the mental health of Katie after experiencing sexual harassment. With this theory, the emotional state of the child should be considered, which is beneficial to further motivate Katie. Moreover, from the case of Katie, it can be said that there is an increasing issue of child abuse in the nation(Gervais and Romano, 2018). On the other hand, according to the theory of child abuse, it could be predicted that Katie has gone through emotional trauma and this apparently has affected her study and other daily activities. Hence, this issuecanbringdeteriorationinher mentalhealth andcan damage her career. Here the discussion reflects the child abuse case of Katie, a girl from the United Kingdom.This study has elaborated Katie’s case in a clear manner,the overall causes of risk factors, the vulnerability of the victim here, the recommendations aligned with this case study of Serious Case Review.The discussion has enlightened all kinds of laws of UK related to sexual harassment and facilities that are required by an abused child should in order to gain both physical and mental stability.Thus, the above study will help in generating awareness among peopleabout child sexual harassment and what should one do if this happens. The study shows the effectiveness of agencies in case of helping Katie with respect to legal support, mental health and physical health needs. 13
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Conclusion This study has helped in analysing the issues of child abuse that is strongly affecting the lives of the children in UK. Here discussion on different theories of child abuse has been done that has helped in understanding the concept of child abuse andways in which abuse can bring negativeeffect in the child’s mind. Moreover, using SCR of Katie, it has been found that this issue has made the child emotionally weak and mentally down. The providedrecommendationssuchasprovidingmentalsupport,takinghelpfrom multinational agencies can help Katie to overcome this trauma of child abuse that is caused due to child exploitation. 14
Reference List Brennan, M. and Phippen, A., 2019.Child Protection and Safeguarding Technologies: Appropriate or Excessive ‘Solutions’ to Social Problems?. Routledge. Brown,K.,2019.Vulnerabilityandchildsexualexploitation:Towardsanapproach grounded in life experiences. Critical Social Policy.(Accessed 10 Nov. 2019). Children’s Commissioner, 2019.Defining child vulnerability: Definitions, frameworks and groups.(Accessed 28 Oct. 2019). Coats, T.J., et.al., 2015. A profile of suspected child abuse as a subgroup of major trauma patients. Emerg Med J, 32(12), pp.921-925. Davies,F.C.(2018)Childsexualabuseandexploitation:Understandingriskand vulnerability. (Accessed 27 Oct. 2019). Gervais, C.L. and Romano, E., 2018. Safeguarding child rights and enhancing caregiver responsibilities among Canadian parents of youth who sexually offend.Child abuse & neglect.76. pp.502-514. Gov.uk. ( 2015)Child abuse concerns: guide for practitioners. What to do if you’re worried a child is being abused: advice for practitioners.(Accessed 22 Nov. 2019). Gov.uk. ( 2019).Rape and Sexual Offences - Chapter 2: Sexual Offences Act 2003 - Principal Offences, and Sexual Offences Act 1956 - Most commonly charged offences | The Crown Prosecution Service. (Accessed 26 Oct. 2019). Gov.uk. (2019)Children Act 1989 CM 2144.(Accessed 17 Nov. 2019). GP notebook (n.d.).Children Act 2004 - General Practice Notebook. Available at: https://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=x20140305071001216972 (Accessed 6 Dec. 2019). Hairston, C. ( 2017).Children with parents in prison: Child welfare policy, program, and practice issues. Routledge. Henderson,D.A.,Thompson,C.L.(2015)CounselingChildren(ninthedition). Cengage Learning, p.631. KeepingChildrenSafe(2014).Availableat: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/standards_child_protection_kcsc_en_1.pd f(Accessed 29 Oct. 2019). Lane, D.C., Munro, E. and Husemann, E., 2016. Blending systems thinking approaches fororganisationalanalysis:reviewingchildprotectioninEngland.European Journal of Operational Research,251(2), pp.613-623. Legislation.gov.uk.(2019).ChildrenAct1989.Availableat: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/41/contents(Accessed 26 Oct. 2019). Legislation.gov.uk.2019.Availableat: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/31/pdfs/ukpga_20040031_en.pdf (Accessed 2 Nov. 2019). Legislation.uk. (2019. )Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/15/contents(Accessed 20 Oct. 2019). Leigh, J. and Laing, J., 2018.Thinking about Child Protection Practice: Case Studies for Critical Reflection and Discussion. Policy Press. 15
Lindon, J. (2012)Safeguarding and Child Protection 0-8 Years (4thEdition).Hodder Education, pp.5-6. Modi, N., and et.al., 2014. Guidance on clinical research involving infants, children and youngpeople:anupdateforresearchersandresearchethicscommittees. Archives of disease in childhood,99(10), pp.887-891 NICE,(2017).Recommendations|Childabuseandneglect|Guidance|NICE. Availableat:https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng76/chapter/Recommendations (Accessed 20 Oct.2019). Parliament.uk. (2019).Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims (Amendment) Act 2012 — UK Parliament. (Accessed 27 Nov. 2019). Pearce,J.(2019)ChildSexualExploitation:whyTheoryMatters.Policy Press/University of Bristol, p.154. SaferChildrenYork(n.d.).PrinciplesoftheChildrenAct1989.Availableat: https://www.saferchildrenyork.org.uk/principles-of-the-children-act.htm (Accessed 20 Nov. 2019). Safety Training Awards (2018).Safeguarding Children, Young People and Vulnerable . Available at:https://www.sta.co.uk/policies/safeguarding-policy/(Accessed 28 Nov. 2019). Saied-Tessier, A., 2014. Estimating the costs of child sexual abuse in the UK (pp. 1-44). London: NSPCC. Salter, M. and Peleg, N., 2019. Submission to the Online Safety Charter consultation, April 2019.(Accessed 27 Oct. 2019). Searing, H. ( 2019).Child Protection Theory and Practice,Radical.org.uk. Available at: https://radical.org.uk/barefoot/cptheory.htm(Accessed: 4 December 2019). Sheehan, R. (2018).Magistrates' decision-making in child protection cases. Routledge. TransparencyProject(2019).Availableat: http://www.transparencyproject.org.uk/press/wp-content/uploads/Section20Guida nceNoteApr17.pdf(Accessed 15 Nov. 2019). UNICEF(2019).Availableat: https://www.unicef.org/pacificislands/IRC_CCSGuide_FullGuide_lowres.pdf (Accessed 21 Nov. 2019). Warr, N. J. (2014)Why Me? Making Sense of Sexual Abuse.Making Sense Books Nanaimo,B.C., P.17. WHO(2019).Availableat: https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/world_report/ factsheets/en/childabusefacts.pdf(Accessed 29 Oct. 2019). Wilson,J.(2018).Child-focusedpractice:Acollaborativesystemicapproach. Routledge. Working Together ( 2018).Chapter 2: Organisational responsibilities.A guide to inter- agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. Available at: https://www.workingtogetheronline.co.uk/chapters/chapter_two.html(Accessed 2 Nov. 2019). 16